<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1998 NYT Article On Sotomayor ‘Delay’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Botfly</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147997</link>
		<dc:creator>Botfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147997</guid>
		<description>For God&#039;s sakes, if we force-feed NY liberal sensibilities onto the rest of the country we are surely headed for certain disaster. As a NY&#039;er I feel it is my duty to warn the rest of you non-NY&#039;ers on the dangers of the NY liberal mindset so as to give you time to prepare for what is sure to be the end of moderated judicial thoughtfulness on the SCOTUS. As Obama blows hot air into his ocarina and his minions obediently dance in lock-step to this administrations every suggestion I am becoming increasingly concerned for the generations to follow. Surely there is a candidate out there who will inspire us because of the workings of their legal analytical mind and not because they are just another Cinderella story from the PJ&#039;s in the boogie down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For God&#8217;s sakes, if we force-feed NY liberal sensibilities onto the rest of the country we are surely headed for certain disaster. As a NY&#8217;er I feel it is my duty to warn the rest of you non-NY&#8217;ers on the dangers of the NY liberal mindset so as to give you time to prepare for what is sure to be the end of moderated judicial thoughtfulness on the SCOTUS. As Obama blows hot air into his ocarina and his minions obediently dance in lock-step to this administrations every suggestion I am becoming increasingly concerned for the generations to follow. Surely there is a candidate out there who will inspire us because of the workings of their legal analytical mind and not because they are just another Cinderella story from the PJ&#8217;s in the boogie down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147909</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147909</guid>
		<description>Some child, somewhere, can be thankful for not ending up with her for a parent.  What does her diabetes have to do with being a competent justice.  The mention of this was merely a ploy to gain sympathy for her and to distract from the real issue of her ideology and her qualification to serve.

Like I said elsewhere, I&#039;d be more comfortable with Judge Judy.  This twit has an axe to grind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some child, somewhere, can be thankful for not ending up with her for a parent.  What does her diabetes have to do with being a competent justice.  The mention of this was merely a ploy to gain sympathy for her and to distract from the real issue of her ideology and her qualification to serve.</p>
<p>Like I said elsewhere, I&#8217;d be more comfortable with Judge Judy.  This twit has an axe to grind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147908</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147908</guid>
		<description>Type 1 diabetics can have very difficult pregnancies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Type 1 diabetics can have very difficult pregnancies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147903</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147903</guid>
		<description>Well, she looks like a regular Dumbledork, if you ask me.  Someone being divorced from her I could understand.  Along with the no kids part.  But playing with the little kids?  Card games?  What&#039;re they playing, Yugio?  Sheesh!  Just the kind of intellectual we need on the Supreme Court--another case of arrested development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, she looks like a regular Dumbledork, if you ask me.  Someone being divorced from her I could understand.  Along with the no kids part.  But playing with the little kids?  Card games?  What&#8217;re they playing, Yugio?  Sheesh!  Just the kind of intellectual we need on the Supreme Court&#8211;another case of arrested development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helena</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147899</link>
		<dc:creator>Helena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147899</guid>
		<description>Apparently there&#039;s a piece by Jeffrey Rosen in the New Republic on her that the libs are up in arms about as misleading:
&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;b&gt;The Case Against Sotomayor&lt;b&gt;
Her former clerks report that because Sotomayor is divorced and has no children, her clerks become like her extended family--working late with her, visiting her apartment once a month for card games (where she remembers their favorite drinks), and taking a field trip together to the premier of a Harry Potter movie.
The Case Against Sotomayor
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They say it makes her seem like a pathetic loner and/or societal misfit.

To me, the most damning thing about it is that she (or anyone over age 11) would go see a Harry Potter movie without a gun to her head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently there&#8217;s a piece by Jeffrey Rosen in the New Republic on her that the libs are up in arms about as misleading:</p>
<blockquote><p> <b>The Case Against Sotomayor</b><b><br />
Her former clerks report that because Sotomayor is divorced and has no children, her clerks become like her extended family&#8211;working late with her, visiting her apartment once a month for card games (where she remembers their favorite drinks), and taking a field trip together to the premier of a Harry Potter movie.<br />
The Case Against Sotomayor<br />
<a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085" rel="nofollow">http://www.tnr.com/politics/st.....e10199a085</a></b></p></blockquote>
<p>They say it makes her seem like a pathetic loner and/or societal misfit.</p>
<p>To me, the most damning thing about it is that she (or anyone over age 11) would go see a Harry Potter movie without a gun to her head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147896</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147896</guid>
		<description>Editors of Law Journals have quite a track record, don&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editors of Law Journals have quite a track record, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147893</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/1998-nyt-piece-on-sotomayor-delay#comment-147893</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot to be said for consistency.  Her judicial ideology hasn&#039;t changed much, and she certainly hasn&#039;t gotten any better looking in the last 11 years either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot to be said for consistency.  Her judicial ideology hasn&#8217;t changed much, and she certainly hasn&#8217;t gotten any better looking in the last 11 years either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

