<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 77% Of Investors: Obama Anti-Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rip Cord</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rip Cord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171520</guid>
		<description>The other 23% are recieving TARP money and were unable to participate in this survey.But thanks for asking. ROFLMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other 23% are recieving TARP money and were unable to participate in this survey.But thanks for asking. ROFLMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgfelis</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171512</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgfelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171512</guid>
		<description>Hm, funny numbers.  If 77% think he is anti-business and 27% view him favorably, that means 4% at worst think he is both anti-business and view him favorably.  Does that mean they have 4% of the respondents being Trial Lawyers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, funny numbers.  If 77% think he is anti-business and 27% view him favorably, that means 4% at worst think he is both anti-business and view him favorably.  Does that mean they have 4% of the respondents being Trial Lawyers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171474</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171474</guid>
		<description>You may not understand the purpose of most surveys, NNC.

The purpose of most surveys nowadays is to be &quot;evidence&quot; to support the propagandist&#039;s point of view.

The most hilarious recent example is Howard Dean using his &quot;polling&quot; to declare, emphatically, that the Massachusetts voter just sent a clear message to Washington that Howard Dean is absolutely right.....Americans want single payer health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may not understand the purpose of most surveys, NNC.</p>
<p>The purpose of most surveys nowadays is to be &#8220;evidence&#8221; to support the propagandist&#8217;s point of view.</p>
<p>The most hilarious recent example is Howard Dean using his &#8220;polling&#8221; to declare, emphatically, that the Massachusetts voter just sent a clear message to Washington that Howard Dean is absolutely right&#8230;..Americans want single payer health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoNeoCommies</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171471</link>
		<dc:creator>NoNeoCommies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/77-of-investors-obama-anti-business#comment-171471</guid>
		<description>All surveys should be presented with a warning.
They should clearly state that the results are based on answers to questions that may not allow respondents to honestly and completely express their point of view.
They should also make it clear that the results come only from those that answer the phone and don&#039;t hang up because they hate survey takers (what % of the population do surveys show don&#039;t participate?)

I only talked to a pollster once, right after an election.
There were few allowed responses that even closely fitted what I wanted to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All surveys should be presented with a warning.<br />
They should clearly state that the results are based on answers to questions that may not allow respondents to honestly and completely express their point of view.<br />
They should also make it clear that the results come only from those that answer the phone and don&#8217;t hang up because they hate survey takers (what % of the population do surveys show don&#8217;t participate?)</p>
<p>I only talked to a pollster once, right after an election.<br />
There were few allowed responses that even closely fitted what I wanted to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

