"The difference is that instead of dirt and poison, we have rather chosen to fill our hives with honey and wax, thus furnishing mankind with the two noblest of things, which are Sweetness and Light." - Jonathan Swift

« Hugo Chavez, China Sign Deals Worth Billions | Home | Chavez Cracks Down Harder On His Opposition »

Ahmadinejad Inaugurates New Nuclear Reactor

From the Voice Of America:

Iran Opens New Phase in Nuclear Program

26 August 2006

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has inaugurated a new heavy-water nuclear reactor at the Arak facility.

The latest phase of the nuclear production plant was opened Saturday during ceremonies at the project, about 200 kilometers southwest of Tehran.

The heavy-water plant will be used to produce plutonium once it is completed in 2009. Western nations fear Iran will use a by-product from the plutonium to build atomic weapons.

Mr. Ahmadinejad opened the new plant just days ahead of the August 31 deadline by the U.N. Security Council mandating Tehran stop its uranium enrichment activities, or risk sanctions.

Iranian officials said Friday Tehran is ready for international talks on its nuclear program, but rejected the West’s "language of force" regarding the issue.

U.S State Department spokesman Gonzago Gallegos said Washington will push for sanctions if Iran does not halt the sensitive nuclear work by the August 31 deadline.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov says it is premature to talk about sanctions, calling for more time to resolve the dispute through negotiations.

And even before these glad tidings, the Los Angeles Times was reporting this:

U.S. May Curb Iran

If the U.N. Security Council won't penalize Tehran for its nuclear program, the White House may forge an alliance to do so.

By Maggie Farley, Times Staff Writer
August 26, 2006

UNITED NATIONS — With increasing signs that several fellow Security Council members may stall a United States push to penalize Iran for its nuclear enrichment program, Bush administration officials have indicated that they are prepared to form an independent coalition to freeze Iranian assets and restrict trade.

The strategy, analysts say, reflects not only long-standing U.S. frustration with the Security Council's inaction on Iran, but also the current weakness of Washington's position because of its controversial role in a series of conflicts in the Middle East, most recently in Lebanon.

Despite assurances from Russia and China in July that they would support initial sanctions against Iran if it failed to suspend aspects of its nuclear program, Russia seemed to backtrack this week after Tehran agreed to continue talks, but refused to halt enrichment. A Security Council resolution gives the Islamic Republic until Aug. 31 to stop uranium enrichment, which could provide fuel to produce electricity or possibly atomic weapons, or face penalties.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei B. Ivanov said Friday that as long as Iran was willing to negotiate, it was "premature" to punish the country and perhaps permanently isolate it.

"I do not know cases in international practice or the whole of the previous experience when sanctions reached their goals or were efficient," Ivanov said.

"Apart from this, I do not think that the issue is so urgent that the U.N. Security Council or the group of six countries" — the U.S., China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany — "should consider the introduction of sanctions. In any case Russia continues to advocate a political and diplomatic solution to the problem." …

Under U.S. terrorism laws, Washington could ramp up its own sanctions, including financial constraints on Tehran and interception of missile and nuclear materials en route to Iran, Bolton said, and the U.S. is encouraging other countries to follow suit. "You don't need Security Council authority to impose sanctions, just as we have," he said…

Somehow I don’t think sanctions are going to cut it.

Mr. Ahmadinejad might be meeting up with his hidden Imam even sooner than he thinks.

Related Articles:

  Print Email

10 Responses to “Ahmadinejad Inaugurates New Nuclear Reactor”

  1. Cox

    Yeah! Sanctions! Just like when Saddam was in power!

  2. sheehanjihad

    Russia and China both know that they are pretty much immune to a nuclear attack from Iran, so they sit back and stick it to the US safe in the knowlege that we are in this almost alone. The rest of the world is gambling that less support for the US will keep them out of the terrorist’s sights, so they tacitly do everything possible to keep Israel, Britain and the US at the forefront of Islamic hatred.

    This will work in the short run because it gives the terrorists a greater focus on a smaller target. Without the entire world against them, they can concentrate their efforts and thus do a better job. What the ignorant Europeans, Russians, and Chinese dont realize is is that they are next. Regardless of how they posture themselves. Divide and conquer is an age old solution to taking on adversaries greater than yourselves, and it works.

    So, for short term gain, we are being dangled as the prize of prizes for terrorists by the rest of the world. So, in that case, we should disregard what the rest of the world thinks, says, or does, and act in a unilateral offensive against Islamic jihadists everywhere. The one major kink in this entire scenario, the one that everyone “else” doesnt take into consideration is, if our economy is paralyzed by a terrorist act…the rest of the world’s economy will fall within a month.

    Nobody likes to admit it, but our economy drives the world’s economy, and without it, countries who depend on us for survival and give us the finger anyway would fold. This includes the oil rich nations who hold us hostage right now. It may be a decidedly irresponsible attitude, but by not supporting our efforts to eliminate terrorists, these other countries are sealing their own fate. We may take a hit, but once more will be the charm, and there will be no holding back when we go after every suppporter of terror worldwide.

    The major supporters of terror, The united nations, france, mexico, china, russia, most of europe will find themselves at the mercy of 300 dollar a barrel oil, and a madman in total control of all of it, and this will happen because they lack the resolve and the foresight to fix the problem before it becomes a nuclear one. I for one, will die laughing, pointing at them all, saying “told ya so!!’” That makes me a neo con too. I dont mind. Our liberalization is a cancer that is eating the fabric of our society from within.

    Rant d jour finished for now…..I just wish responsible people would pay attention to what they are doing, instead of paying attention to themselves.

  3. Phredd

    China, being an overtly atheist communist country, is already dealing with Muslim fundamentalists on their western frontier. Russsia has been fighting a war with terrorism for years, and by all accounts, has enough oil resources of their own to make Tehran moot.
    So why hold back? Both their economies (especially China) are dependant on trade with the US. China’s ascendancy to world domination cannot occur w/o American consumer dollars, and no nation will be immune to islamofascism once the US falls.

  4. AmericanIPA

    Totally agree sj. How long would it take, if either perceived Iran as an urgent threat to themselves, for Russia or China to level every bit of nuclear technology in that country? Two, three minutes maybe?

    The best thing that could happen for the rest of the free world would be for a terrorist strike to take place in Russia or China. Then, when these people were skinned and hanged in the streets by the ChiComs or Ruskies, we would be off the hook for any response we have to terrorists as well. Add to that the instant ire of all arab peoples after that retaliation and the inevitable upswing in terrorism as a result, and the war on terror would have a new face. (And something tells me that neither country would consult the wily Security Council for permission to defend themselves either). But the fact that muslim extremists haven’t hit either place tells me one thing: Islamists fear those they know will fight back. I wish that would sink in to our leaders and clueless voters.

    But Russia and especially China don’t want the US to dissapear, they just want us extremely weakened militarily. We are a huge consumer of chinese goods and they couldn’t do without the customers. If things keep on the same course (which unfortunately things seem to do) China will be the world’s lone superpower in the near future. Exactly what they want, I would say.

    I’ve said it before and I’ll repeat it now, our best bet for survival is to leave the UN to the eurotrash and form our own coalition of players who are not out to destroy us. Granted, there aren’t many left currently, but after a few successes by such a coalition and the inevitable continued failures of the UN (I’m sure they would be in Paris after we kicked them out of NY) surely others would come around to our side. Australia, Israel, India, Japan, Ukraine, etc. would be a good start. And those countries currently allocated to mere bit parts in the UN game could see a strategic upswing if they threw in with a new group. But could the liberals in this country ever be outnumbered enough to accomplish this dream? Would president Hillary, or secretary of state Billary die laughing at the idea?

  5. OLDPUPPYMAX

    I would offer the nations undying thanks for 26 years of Iranian terror to Jimmy Carter, but I’m afraid the undying part remains to be seen.

  6. artboyusa

    Back yesterday from a week of mountains and fjords in Norway with Mrs Artboy (excellent country. Expensive, but worth it. Highly recommend). A whole week without newspapers and TV. What a pleasure, what a relief to forget for a little while about this screwed up world and the screwed up people who are screwing it up. Then I come back and on one channel there’s the goof from Iran, in his leisure suit and his “Boy’s Regular” haircut, jibbering away, and on the other channel there’s our goof, stumbling through his “statesmanlike” speech like some 2nd grader trying to get through My Weekly Reader (he couldn’t pronounce “totalitarian” three times in a row) and I just think We’re All Doomed. Look at these gimps; you couldn’t trust either of them to make a cheese sandwich and soon we’ll have to fight one while being led, if that’s what he does, by the other. Oh man….its September 1 and I’ve got them ole 1939 Blues again.

  7. SG

    “on the other channel there’s our goof, stumbling through his “statesmanlike” speech like some 2nd grader trying to get through My Weekly Reader (he couldn’t pronounce “totalitarian” three times in a row)”

    I think rhetoric is overrated as an indicator of intellect.

    We tend to think back on Lincoln as the epitome of a great speaker. But in his day he was mocked unmercifully for sounding like a subliterate hick. And he had a very high pitched voice, besides.

    In fact, since you mentioned 1939, Hitler was also mocked as sounding like a rube — at least in his early days. Of course he was barely self-educated, and from a very rustic part of Austria.

  8. DW

    Here’s a good article by Kathleen Parker, on President Bush and why he sounds the way he does:
    http://www.townhall.com/column.....ous_george

  9. artboyusa

    Totally agree, SG and I’m aware that GWB’s not anywhere near so dumb as the libs want him to be or as he presents himself as being. My problem is that, even so, I don’t think he’s up to the job that needs to be done (I’d hoped he was, but he hasn’t delivered) and that the shambling, inarticulate image he presents to the world becomes the world’s image of America -and that ain’t a good thing. Image matters in a war - just ask Winston ChurchillI - but GWB’s inability to present our case with any kind of effectiveness has done us a lot of harm. That stuff’s part of his job and he’s way underperforming at it. I’m about as far-Right and flag waving as they get and I’m still embarrassed by the junk that comes out of this guy’s mouth. He’s awful. What’s his problem? I mean, we stand for Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and the other side stands for repression and head chopping but this goof still can’t get the message across.

  10. groovygrl

    I agree with both. W is no moron. He just speaks Texan and that’s ok. But I often feel that he just doesn’t get the point across nearly enough. His speechwriters are not at all effective. And when someone presents a clearly inaccurate argument to him, he doesn’t tear it to shreds like I’d like him to. Granted, he’s an MBA (HARVARD) not an attorney.


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« Hugo Chavez, China Sign Deals Worth Billions | Chavez Cracks Down Harder On His Opposition »