Dang, that would be a quick, fair, inexpensive, one trial to tell if the good ones from the bad ones.

And the problem here is what…a president who is a weenie when is comes to our protection?

Terrorists not only are laughing at us .. they gotta truly be lovin’ our new o-blah-blah outcomes. They get to spread their terror – kill, maim, and terrorize other folks – and if they get caught .. they get a vacation – rest and relax in sunny Cuba – be fed and get a lawyer .. so’s to be ready to fight again! They gotta be thinkin’ allah is good.

ps Maybe Best Name Ever

Case closed.

How much easier for FDR who simply gave enemy combatants secret trials in military tribunals & then had them executed.

Our enemies are laughing at us.

on a more serious but perverse note……terror may be the only thing that ousts Obama. I’m afraid racial politics and welfare handouts will give him a huge electoral advantage….but another devastating terror event on US soil just might swing the next election back.

U.S. to Transfer Al Qaeda Combatant Into Civilian Court System

The transfer is the first signal of how the Obama administration is likely to handle accused terrorists, a significant shift from the strategy of the Bush administration

WASHINGTON — An accused Al Qaeda sleeper agent held for 5 1/2 years at a Navy brig in South Carolina will soon be sent to Illinois for trial in civilian court, a move the government has fought for years saying terror suspects caught in the U.S. could be held indefinitely without charges.

Two people familiar with the case of Qatar native Ali al-Marri said Thursday the government plans to transfer him to the civilian court system. One of them said he would be charged with providing support to terrorists. The two people spoke on condition of anonymity because it’s a pending criminal case.

The transfer could avert a Supreme Court hearing in April and a subsequent ruling that would govern other cases against accused terrorists. Al-Marri’s transfer is the first signal of how the Obama administration is likely to handle accused terrorists, a significant shift from the strategy of the Bush administration.

Since shortly after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, government lawyers argued that the president has the wartime authority to send the military into any U.S. neighborhood, capture a citizen — or legal resident like al-Marri — and hold him in prison without charge, indefinitely.

Putting al-Marri into the federal court system follows a similar move made by the Bush administration with another enemy combatant, Jose Padilla. Padilla, once held at the same brig as al-Marri, was eventually convicted of terror-related charges in federal court in Florida.

The decision on al-Marri was reported separately Thursday by the Web sites of The Washington Post and The New Yorker magazine.

Al-Marri was the subject of one of President Barack Obama’s first official acts, signing an executive order for “a prompt and thorough” review of al-Marri’s continued detention.

Now, according to those familiar with the case, <b.that review has resulted in a decision to put him back into the civilian court system.

Justice Dept. spokesman Dean Boyd declined to comment on the plans for al-Marri.

“If this is true, it’s an important step,” said Jonathan Hafetz, one of al-Marri’s lawyers. “This is what should have happened seven years ago. Indefinite military detention, without charge, of people with legal residence in America is illegal.”

Yet such a move may derail the legal challenge Hafetz and the American Civil Liberties Union have brought to the Supreme Court.

The new administration is facing a March deadline to file papers in the al-Marri case before the court, and transferring him to a criminal courtroom may enable the administration to avoid taking a clear position on enemy combatants.

“It’s vital for the Supreme Court to review the case and make that clear once and for all,” said Hafetz. “Otherwise the government will be free to do the same thing again.”

Al-Marri’s case before the high court hinges on whether the president has the authority to detain as enemy combatants people who are in the United States legally, a question that could apply to a U.S. citizen as well as a foreigner.

The new administration might not want to force the court to decide that issue, thereby preserving the possibility that Obama or future presidents could exercise that power.

The government says al-Marri is an Al Qaeda sleeper agent who has met Osama bin Laden and spent time at a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. …

http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....ian-court/

Since he’ll be tried in the civilian courts, how long before he’s free on bail?