Comments on: AP: Religious Opponents v Gay Victories http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-religious-opponents-v-gay-victories Thu, 24 May 2012 14:54:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: canary http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-religious-opponents-v-gay-victories#comment-163828 canary Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:54:30 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-religious-opponents-v-gay-victories#comment-163828 Homeland Security should put them on the terrorist risk list, since they are making a habit of these protests. Can you picture the day Obama changes the don't ask, don't tell rule. I wonder how these soldiers will celebrate the day. Better keep their mouths shut if there are any muslim's around. Homeland Security should put them on the terrorist risk list, since they are making a habit of these protests.

Can you picture the day Obama changes the don’t ask, don’t tell rule.
I wonder how these soldiers will celebrate the day. Better keep their mouths shut if there are any muslim’s around.

]]> By: Reality Bytes http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-religious-opponents-v-gay-victories#comment-163813 Reality Bytes Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:26:38 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-religious-opponents-v-gay-victories#comment-163813 Let's be fair. There were a lot more people there than the photo shows. Most of them were hidden in the bushes. Let’s be fair. There were a lot more people there than the photo shows. Most of them were hidden in the bushes.

]]> By: VMAN http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-religious-opponents-v-gay-victories#comment-163760 VMAN Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:44:32 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-religious-opponents-v-gay-victories#comment-163760 As I have this said before. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that homosexuals are born that way. A simple study of anatomy will tell anyone that homosexuality is a perversion of the natural use of male and female sex organs. Given that then we can say that homosexuality is a birth defect and should be treated as such. We would not think twice about operating on a baby that has a hole in it's heart so why should we treat the birth defect of homosexuality any different? As I have this said before. Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that homosexuals are born that way. A simple study of anatomy will tell anyone that homosexuality is a perversion of the natural use of male and female sex organs. Given that then we can say that homosexuality is a birth defect and should be treated as such. We would not think twice about operating on a baby that has a hole in it’s heart so why should we treat the birth defect of homosexuality any different?

]]>