"The difference is that instead of dirt and poison, we have rather chosen to fill our hives with honey and wax, thus furnishing mankind with the two noblest of things, which are Sweetness and Light." - Jonathan Swift

« Elian Gonzalez Is Now A Young Communist | Home | International Blogger Arrests Hit New High »

AP To Limit Use Of Its Articles On Websites

From those champions of freedom and information at the AP’s New York Times:

The Associated Press to Set Guidelines for Using Its Articles in Blogs

By SAUL HANSELL

Published: June 16, 2008

The Associated Press, one of the nation’s largest news organizations, said that it will, for the first time, attempt to define clear standards as to how much of its articles and broadcasts bloggers and Web sites can excerpt without infringing on The A.P.’s copyright.

The A.P.’s effort to impose some guidelines on the free-wheeling blogosphere, where extensive quoting and even copying of entire news articles is common, may offer a prominent definition of the important but vague doctrine of “fair use,” which holds that copyright owners cannot ban others from using small bits of their works under some circumstances. For example, a book reviewer is allowed to quote passages from the work without permission from the publisher.

Fair use has become an essential concept to many bloggers, who often quote portions of articles before discussing them. The A.P., a cooperative owned by 1,500 daily newspapers, including The New York Times, provides written articles and broadcast material to thousands of news organizations and Web sites that pay to use them.

Last week, The A.P. took an unusually strict position against quotation of its work, sending a letter to the Drudge Retort asking it to remove seven items that contained quotations from A.P. articles ranging from 39 to 79 words.

On Saturday, The A.P. retreated. Jim Kennedy, vice president and strategy director of The A.P., said in an interview that the news organization had decided that its letter to the Drudge Retort was “heavy-handed” and that The A.P. was going to rethink its policies toward bloggers…

The Drudge Retort was initially started as a left-leaning parody of the much larger Drudge Report, run by the conservative muckraker Matt Drudge. In recent years, the Drudge Retort has become more of a social news site, similar to sites like Digg, in which members post links to news articles for others to comment on…

On Friday, The A.P. issued a statement defending its action, saying it was going to challenge blog postings containing excerpts of A.P. articles “when we feel the use is more reproduction than reference, or when others are encouraged to cut and paste.” An A.P. spokesman declined Friday to further explain the association’s position.

After that, however, the news association convened a meeting of its executives at which it decided to suspend its efforts to challenge blogs until it creates a more thoughtful standard…

Mr. Kennedy said the company was going to meet with representatives of the Media Bloggers Association, a trade group, and others. He said he hopes that these discussions can all occur this week so that guidelines can be released soon.

Still, Mr. Kennedy said that the organization has not withdrawn its request that Drudge Retort remove the seven items. And he said that he still believes that it is more appropriate for blogs to use short summaries of A.P. articles rather than direct quotations, even short ones…

Even if The A.P. sets standards, bloggers could choose to use more content than its standards permit, and then The A.P. would have to decide whether to take legal action against them. One important legal test of whether an excerpt exceeds fair use is if it causes financial harm to the copyright owner.

“The principal question is whether the excerpt is a substitute for the story, or some established adaptation of the story,” said Timothy Wu, a professor at the Columbia Law School. Mr. Wu said that the case is not clear-cut, but he believes that The A.P. is likely to lose a court case to assert a claim on that issue.

“It’s hard to see how the Drudge Retort ‘first few lines’ is a substitute for the story,” Mr. Wu said.

Mr. Kennedy argued, however, that The Associated Press believes that in some cases, the essence of an article can be encapsulated in very few words…

But he also said that the association hopes that it will not have to test this theory in court.

We are not trying to sue bloggers,” Mr. Kennedy said. “That would be the rough equivalent of suing grandma and the kids for stealing music. That is not what we are trying to do.”

There is no denying that the Associated Press has a point. Many sites simply repackage their articles wholesale, and often do so merely for profit.

But this site and others like it use excerpts from stories by the AP and other media outlet to discuss the events of the day. How could we talk about them otherwise?

But much more importantly, we here at S&L post such articles to show the non-stop leftward bias in the reporting of these events.

Indeed, it is for the latter reason that this site exists — to expose the heavy handed agenda of our watchdog media.

A bias which is so ubiquitous that it shows up in nearly every article no matter the subject:

The Drudge Retort was initially started as a left-leaning parody of the much larger Drudge Report, run by the conservative muckraker Matt Drudge.

(Note that the despicable "Drudge Retort" is not characterized in any kind of negative fashion.)

And that cannot always be done with only cursory excerpts or summaries.

We are the mainstream media’s fact-checkers. And we provide a real public service that is essential in a Democracy. Especially one with a one party media.

“We are not trying to sue bloggers,” Mr. Kennedy said. “That would be the rough equivalent of suing grandma and the kids for stealing music…"

What magnificent condescension.

In truth, sites like this are analogous to "music critics," who have always been afforded the right under our laws to play the passages about which they write.

Related Articles:

  Print Email

8 Responses to “AP To Limit Use Of Its Articles On Websites”

  1. RightWinger

    I am only surprised that it took them that long to get around to it. How many e-mails must they get daily from people ragging on them for their political bias that is exposed everyday on blogs such as S&L ?

    “The Associated Press, one of the nation’s largest news organizations,”

    I take offense to that statement. Now had it said…“The Associated Press, one of the DNC’s largest propoganda organzations”…then at least it would have been truthful.

  2. GuppyNblue

    I had to hesitate a few weeks ago when I saw a policy statement at the end of an AP article. “This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.”
    Now I know what’s up. Personally I think it’s bad business on their part.

    I think we have bigger evils coming after the liberals take the White House and get their veto overriding majority in Congress. With the fairness doctrine and PC legislation they will finish shutting down any and all dissenting voices. I don’t know about you guys but I don’t like being shushed and will no doubt have to find another way to express myself.

  3. wardmama4

    Indeed this is all another way to silence the two medias which are exposing their bias, lies and distortions on a daily basis - talk radio and the Internet. . .

    I just can’t believe that so many people are blind to the damage that will be done when these heavy handed silencers wreck their damage.

    But I guess that they will remain clueless until those of us who are sane, patriotic and freedom loving step up to the plate and get them booted out of office. We need to start now - Nov is going to be too late to get the movement going.

  4. platypus

    This is whining by AP. Until it gets loud enough, it should be ignored.

    Having said that, they have zero chance of winning a lawsuit primarily because the subscription fees charged by AP have to do with the fungible nature of news. In most instances, yesterday’s news is only read by parrots on a perch which is its general value a day later.

    The subscribers get first dibs on the stories and they pay for that access. When they publish those stories, and make a profit on the publication the articles are in, they come under the purview of the First Amendment.

    Unless another entity is re-publishing them in order to sell a product, it is hard to envision why the First Amendment would not prevent using the copyright laws to restrict a discussion about the articles.

    The other part of this argument is that AP and its subscribers have already set the value of the articles by contract. So how can they say that the contract binds third parties that the contract itself INTENDS to take possession of the articles for the price of the subscribers’ publications?

    I might have some sympathy for AP if someone hacked their network and masqueraded as a subscriber. But we are discussing a flow of product for profit that is operating exactly as intended and contracted.

    Where’s the harm? It’s in the content, not the action, and that is EXACTLY what is hurting AP.

    They see the future, and the future is websites like this one possibly providing content to subscribers for a fee but written by unpaid (or lowly paid) commenters.

    When the truth becomes more valuable than the size of the prevaricating monolith, the monolith crumbles and truth stands tall atop the rubble.

  5. sheehanjihad

    I foresee a time in the next four years where this site will ultimately “disappear”….and it’s name will change to “ERROR 404…unable to access website”. This is one of the very few places where the actual truth is put out for perusal by anyone, and the scoops that have been used, or hijacked and used have caused the left a lot of grief. Once that left gains the rest of the power after the elections….this site and many others will be toast. I certainly hope that doesnt happen…..but as I read the everyday goings on in this country and the world, I am not encouraged by what I see…….

    the only consolation is that everyone who posts here will have their ISP and number logged in a file under “subversive” and thus be tagged for “future adjudication” when that time comes. I wonder how far off my vision of the future is actually……..and who will take this country down….democrat liberal leftists, or islamic fundamentalist muslims…..or both fighting for the scraps. Well, either way, they better remember to bring their “big boy” equipment coming down here….it wont be easy.

  6. texaspsue

    Chilling thought, SJ. And to think, the Liberals claim to be such proponents of free speech? Sheesh!

  7. SG

    Here are the preposterous rates that the Associated Press want from anyone who is analyzing their propaganda pieces:

    iCopyright: Associated Press Content Services
    http://license.icopyright.net/.....urt=nullit

    Note that the charges start at anything over four words. FOUR WORDS!

    They are making up their own laws out of whole cloth.

    Remember how our watchdog media used to rail against the Bush administration’s “chilling effect” on free speech?

    It is to laugh. The AP could give Stalin censorship lessons.

    This will backfire on them — big time.

  8. 1sttofight

    Here are two words they can have for free,

    SHOVE IT !!!


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« Elian Gonzalez Is Now A Young Communist | International Blogger Arrests Hit New High »