Hah!! That only proves the error of the definition. One look at the people elected to our congress should convince anyone since, although every person born out of wedlock is, indeed, a bastard, not every bastard was born out of wedlock.

I decided to check out the Wellcome Foundation to see if I could find some uber-Left cabal of evil scientists who were trying to shape national policy with their research. Is it possible they were trying to find reasons to undermine the notion of waiting until one is married before having children? Perhaps. Carry the thinking a little further, and you can imagine a society that simply gives up on the notion of marriage as a prerequisite for procreation. This is exactly part of the formula expressed by communists, both domestic and foreign, such as the American Fabians, the ACLU, and many individuals like John Dewey in the 1920′s and 1930′s, where it is easy to see that there is an effort to change the Judeo-Christian standards and morals of this country in order to usher in a “new age”. (source, p 129)

Of course, this dechristianization of the West is nothing new. It was attempted in France’s Reign Of Terror, and has been gathering considerable momentum since the time of Antonio Gramsci, a Marxist theorist from 100 years ago:

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 1600 years, it was therefore completely fused with Western civilization. The West, advised Gramsci, would have to be dechristianized and simultaneously atheitized by means of a “long march through the culture” so as to slowly infiltrate and then radically transform every cultural institution from the family, to the church, seminaries, schools, universities, judiciary, media, entertainment, politics, and political parties.
Extreme (obscene) sex education was the strategy added by Lukacs. He reasoned that if Christian sexual ethics such as chastity (abstinence), fidelity, and monogamy could be undermined among children, then both the hated traditional family and Christianity would be dealt crippling blows. Towards this end, Lukacs launched radical sex education programs in the schools. Children, under the control of Bolshevik commissars, were force-fed atheism and instructed in all aspects of promiscuity while simultaneously encouraged to deride and reject their parents, pastors, and Christian moral ethics. All of this was accompanied by a reign of terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and other dissenters. Lukacs’ strategic method would later be brought to American schools by among others, the NEA, ACLU, GLSEN, and GSA. (source)

However, after checking out the Wellcome website, I found a heritage organization in England that is rather fond of its legacy and founder, Sir Henry Wellcome. Much of the history of the organization details how effective of a salesman he was, and what a bourgeois lifestyle he led. Hard-core PETA Leftists would be appaled at Wellcome’s company today–they dutifully explain that they test on animals!

So where is the evidence of their attempt to undermine England’s mores? It isn’t on there, of course. If they were dedicated to such things, they of course would not advertise their subversive aims.

It was when I read of his troubled marriage that I began to think, “Maybe the Wellcome organization seeks to sell a lifestyle that results in the sale of more of their services. After all, they come from a long line of upper-class debauchery, oblivious to the ingredients that make a sound society (family, freedom, etc).”

What do you think? Are they simply lab technicians looking to grow their profit margins or are they after bigger game?