And they did get the part about Kennedy getting only 1% right.

Even if it was only a test, it was a “dream test”…

I guess when the mainstream media are nothing but the PAID propagandists of this administration, the truth does not exist.

Their arrogance and condescension towards the ‘unwashed masses’ makes them totally incapable of accepting the fact that WE, THE PEOPLE are smarter, and better informed than the filthy sewage of the media have been taught to believe.

The elitists got Obama elected by NOT telling the voters the truth, just as they tried to throw the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, by calling Florida for algore before all the polls had closed, and by fabricating the National Guard ‘scandal’ concerning ‘W’s’ military service, and the arrogant, out of touch, elite, believe that since it either worked (2008), or almost worked (2000/2004), it is a tried and true tactic that is worth trying.

The shills of the media MUST be held accountable for their actions.

Now let the legal challenges and delays in certifying the election start.

I’m sure the DNC will have no problem “finding” 5% of votes “mismarked” or otherwise “misread” for Brown.

For Immediate Release: January 19, 2010

Contact: Alex Zaroulis (617) 549-0358

Campaign Manager Kevin Conroy:

We’ve received several independent and disturbing reports of voters across the state being handed ballots that are already marked in favor of Scott Brown. This is obviously a serious violation, and our legal team is taking immediate steps to protect the integrity of this election.

We do not yet know why this is happening, but you and everyone you know needs to be aware of the situation so that you can carefully inspect your ballot. If a vote has already been marked, you must return the ballot to the elections official, demand a clean ballot, and call our Voter Protection Hotline at 617-351-6866.

###

http://www.marthacoakley.com/n.....ts-pre-mar

Coakley has exactly 50% to 6 decimal places.

Brown has exactly 49% to 6 decimal places.

Easily Hacked Voting Systems to be Used in MA Special Election for the U.S. Senate
World/National News
Written by Nathan Barker and Brad Friedman
Friday, 15 January 2010 08:20

BOSTON, MA – Next Tuesday’s Special Election for the U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts looks to be coming down to the wire. Surprising pundits in what had previously been thought to be a cakewalk for State Attorney General Martha Coakley, the Democratic candidate hoping to fill the seat of the late Senator Ted Kennedy, Republican state Senator Scott Brown has come on strong in the final days of the campaign.

But as the election looms, tempers flare, money is poured into the contest from all sides, and Democrats sweat out what should have been a safe seat for them – a Democrat named Kennedy has held that particular seat for more than the last 50 years – questions about whether the election results can be trusted have already emerged in a race where the stakes couldn’t be higher.

As the 60th “filibuster-proof” Democratic U.S. Senate seat hangs in the balance – and the party’s healthcare reform bill and other key legislative hopes along with it – fears are mounting that the final vote tallies could be as questionable as they were in the recent NY-23 Special Election for the U.S. House. Perhaps even more so.

The electronic voting systems used in Massachusetts are notoriously plagued with problems and vulnerabilities, and are in violation of federal voting system standards. Moreover, they are sold, programmed, and maintained by a company with a disturbing criminal background.

SEE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....r_embedded

http://www.gouverneurtimes.com.....enate.html

If anyone thinks the Commiecrats will give that seat up, they’re fooling themselves. Further, the ‘rats are playing with fissile material if they steal this election. The polls had been heavily in Brown’s favor and Mahsha Croakley has been running a campaign which to call it “anemic” would be giving it a compliment. Their attempts to steal this election are so transparent as to be ridiculous…and will only result in stoking the fires of popular revolt against their “benevolent” rule.

If you look at the bottom image, it says: “100% reporting.”

It’s most likely as you suggest–the “fix” is in, and has been for days now. All this other crap (White House aids projecting a Brown win, etc) is for naught but to provide a smokescreen for what was really going on.