Comments on: CBS: Shooting Proves Rise Of Hate Groups

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:15:37 +0000

Is there a “S&L” Csar in our near future?

By: BannedbytheTaliban

BannedbytheTaliban — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:01:15 +0000

While listening to Boortz, a sound bite for Alan Colmes said he would discuss the political ramifications of another gun crime and the need for more control. Of course maybe Alan should read this:

He was convicted for breaking in to Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington in 1981, armed with a revolver, sawed-off shotgun and hunting knife.

This nut job, no not Alan, Von Brunn, most certainly didn’t buy his gun legally. What would have more gun control have done? And why don’t we talk about Islam control every time there is violent Jihad perpetrated against Americans? That’s right, people aren’t responsible for their actions, guns and big business are.

By: Barbie

Barbie — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:22:42 +0000

The American leftists are the biggest haters ever. They hate everybody and everything that do not follow their beliefs. The left love it when innocent people die. THis is the truth. This murderer yesterday was a 9/11 truther – he was a nut from the get go and he certainly subscribed to hating and disdaining those appearing on the left’s hate list. The leftists hate Jewish people and it goes on and on.

By: David

David — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:50:15 +0000

Nothing proves the rise in hate groups more clearly than the outcome of the last presidential election.

By: pdsand

pdsand — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:06:15 +0000

If this proves a rise in hate groups, CBS must be talking about a rise in hate groups in the 1950s.

By: proreason

proreason — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:01:26 +0000

The goal is to fracture the country so the commissars waltz into total power. Defining and propaganizing “hate groups” is one of the techniques.

Everything is designed to create tiny groups that hate each other, because the more the population is Balkanized, the easier it is:

- to keep them in constant conflict against each other, rather than against the government
- to select groups that can be “rewarded” for compliance with the central regime
- to hide what the central regime is doing because “the news” is about group conflict instead of the failures of the central regime

No group can be allowed to have power that rivals the commissar’s power. Understand that and you understand the attacks on religion, the attacks on the military and veterans, the attacks on business, the attacks on families, the attacks on patriotism, the attacks on free speech

By: Yarddog1

Yarddog1 — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:44:37 +0000

“Shooting Proves Rise of Hate Groups”……..

“Eating Proves Rise of Hunger”…….. These news “analysts” always see the worst in everything. Hate has been around a long time – and it all does not originate from one particular class or group of individuals.

By: Right of the People

Right of the People — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:42:32 +0000

I still don’t get the concept of a “hate crime” and I’m in law enforcement. To me, murder is the ultimate “hate crime” no matter who does whom. From what I can see, if it is a crime against a minority, a liberal or by a white male, then it is a “hate crime”, if the same crime is perpetrated by a minority/liberal against a white male, it is just a crime.

Kind of reminds me of an old Richard Pryor routine where he’s talking about a prize fight where Joe Louis was the ref and some black boxer is beating the snot out of a white boxer. He says, “Hey Joe, stop the fight, he’s killing him.” and Joe Louis replies, “Shit, he looks okay to me.”

By: curvyred

curvyred — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:50:48 +0000

Yes outrage at what he perceives to be “right-wing” radicalism – but just “saddness” at the Islamic extremist who killed for practically the same reason: hate and bigotry.

By: Rusty Shackleford

Rusty Shackleford — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:24:24 +0000

Obama expressed outrage at this.

Obama expressed outrage at the murder of an abortionist.

The murder of active-duty recruiters by a muslim radical? No outrage.

It is clear.