<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPAC &#8216;09 &#8211; Coulter, Limbaugh&#8230; And Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:42:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135864</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135864</guid>
		<description>Indeedeth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeedeth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135862</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135862</guid>
		<description>methinks thou doeth protesteth too much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>methinks thou doeth protesteth too much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa22</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135860</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135860</guid>
		<description>&quot;As for me personally, I am 41, raised by two WW11 generation parents, nothing more than blue collar working class. Low income people, never felt the need to use drugs, mess around before marriage, 2 great kids after the fact. You see, it can be done. Where are those conservatives??&quot;

BL, well, la-di-da! I am in your age range, single, also raised by a WWII veteran, mother was ill most of the time so my dad practically raised my brother and myself, and my brother was divorced twice.  Do I pass judgment on my brother?  No.   

We all can&#039;t live perfect lives, you were super-lucky not to make mistakes - several of my friends made mistakes in their lives and relationships and are paying for them now (poor things) and no, I don&#039;t judge them either.  Yes, &quot;it can be done&quot; but it&#039;s not easy, especially in this day and age where style rules over substance most of the time, and that&#039;s how kids are brought up now.  I think there&#039;s a phrase, &quot;you should walk a mile in my shoes before judging me&quot; and you would be well inclined to heed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for me personally, I am 41, raised by two WW11 generation parents, nothing more than blue collar working class. Low income people, never felt the need to use drugs, mess around before marriage, 2 great kids after the fact. You see, it can be done. Where are those conservatives??&#8221;</p>
<p>BL, well, la-di-da! I am in your age range, single, also raised by a WWII veteran, mother was ill most of the time so my dad practically raised my brother and myself, and my brother was divorced twice.  Do I pass judgment on my brother?  No.   </p>
<p>We all can&#8217;t live perfect lives, you were super-lucky not to make mistakes &#8211; several of my friends made mistakes in their lives and relationships and are paying for them now (poor things) and no, I don&#8217;t judge them either.  Yes, &#8220;it can be done&#8221; but it&#8217;s not easy, especially in this day and age where style rules over substance most of the time, and that&#8217;s how kids are brought up now.  I think there&#8217;s a phrase, &#8220;you should walk a mile in my shoes before judging me&#8221; and you would be well inclined to heed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bl</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135858</link>
		<dc:creator>bl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135858</guid>
		<description>Oh my God, Please stop having a heart attack!! Stop with the God is gonna get me bit. I was a consistent part of Ann&#039;s other site. The Get Drunk site. I also made these points there also. From time to time there were insults, like above. But for the most part, everybody got it. Look, I loved it when it started to become Palin/McCain instead of McCain/Palin. I got shook when Fox reported this about a week or so after she became his running mate. But not to much, only because the MSM abused it so badly. 
Look, I can&#039;t apologize for missing the original generation of real politicians with backbones. She in many ways resembles R. Reagan. She pushed back corruption, didn&#039;t care if you had R&#039;s or D&#039;s next to your name. She did it alone up there in her state. So did he. Magnificient! That&#039;s all I need and you have got my vote. She is a true protector and server of the people. So stay with that, run like wild with it. This is what everybody is missing here. Let&#039;s see two part interviews with Greta about the criminals working with Obama. Let&#039;s see two part interviews about how and why corruption within allows the outside world to get wise and realize, America is watering down.
Look, she shined like a diamond on these issues. Keep it going! All the MSM could do is get confused and tell me she spends to much money on shoes. Now that it&#039;s all over with, I&#039;m getting lessons on abstinense from her 17 year old. You see, here&#039;s my problem. She diverted herself into what they (MSM) wanted all along. 
Some one way above me here made an excellent point about Patti Davis. Well, did Reagan ever sit and make a big deal about it? Did he sit and do extended interviews about it? Never. Why should he? He understood this woman was his daughter, loved her, and felt sorry for her. In the end he won again though. That look of regret on her face was unbearable at his funeral. It&#039;s seared in my head. This is what I want from Palin and the rest.
But it is so hard when the bulk of representation doesn&#039;t have that basic family value tradition. I should have mentioned this the first time around. To drive my point home. I was truly disgusted with the whole lineup of Republicans. Thompson, Guliani, McCain. Those 3 interrupted Romney big time. I also got a partial read on Gingrich&#039;s interview with James Dobson when the campaign was in it&#039;s infancy. Suddenly, he is no longer considering running. I have listened to him many times on Hannity&#039;s programs. Up until that Dobson interview, I had no idea this guy was married 3 times.
I lost respect for him immediatley. That group of guys had like 8 or 9 marriages between them. 
Sorry, but I gotta have a whole package deal. If you are screwing up your own family, your kids from your first marriage can&#039;t stand you. What makes you think the idea of conservatism and values come through? 
Now Palin doesn&#039;t have any of this. But by diverting into this issue of the teenager, she gives the O.K to the enemy to say &quot;You see, they call themselves values people. &quot; Do what Reagan did! Know it&#039;s there, it will always be there. But let them keep falling into themselves by making an issue of it. Don&#039;t help them with two part interviews and lessons on sexual behavior. Keep the kids away from those cameras. Please!
Also, no need to defend Ann Coulter, I, believe it or not, am a fan of hers. I&#039;m a bigger fan of her late father though. On her Get Drunk site, I made mention of his union busting days with the FBI. That&#039;s just what I mean folks. He destroyed within. Those commies would have destroyed businesses a long time ago if not for her dad and guys like him. I just wish she could talk about Christian wives being submissive to their husbands and the nucleas of family with some experience. It would hold more water with people who share her concerns. Case Closed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God, Please stop having a heart attack!! Stop with the God is gonna get me bit. I was a consistent part of Ann&#8217;s other site. The Get Drunk site. I also made these points there also. From time to time there were insults, like above. But for the most part, everybody got it. Look, I loved it when it started to become Palin/McCain instead of McCain/Palin. I got shook when Fox reported this about a week or so after she became his running mate. But not to much, only because the MSM abused it so badly.<br />
Look, I can&#8217;t apologize for missing the original generation of real politicians with backbones. She in many ways resembles R. Reagan. She pushed back corruption, didn&#8217;t care if you had R&#8217;s or D&#8217;s next to your name. She did it alone up there in her state. So did he. Magnificient! That&#8217;s all I need and you have got my vote. She is a true protector and server of the people. So stay with that, run like wild with it. This is what everybody is missing here. Let&#8217;s see two part interviews with Greta about the criminals working with Obama. Let&#8217;s see two part interviews about how and why corruption within allows the outside world to get wise and realize, America is watering down.<br />
Look, she shined like a diamond on these issues. Keep it going! All the MSM could do is get confused and tell me she spends to much money on shoes. Now that it&#8217;s all over with, I&#8217;m getting lessons on abstinense from her 17 year old. You see, here&#8217;s my problem. She diverted herself into what they (MSM) wanted all along.<br />
Some one way above me here made an excellent point about Patti Davis. Well, did Reagan ever sit and make a big deal about it? Did he sit and do extended interviews about it? Never. Why should he? He understood this woman was his daughter, loved her, and felt sorry for her. In the end he won again though. That look of regret on her face was unbearable at his funeral. It&#8217;s seared in my head. This is what I want from Palin and the rest.<br />
But it is so hard when the bulk of representation doesn&#8217;t have that basic family value tradition. I should have mentioned this the first time around. To drive my point home. I was truly disgusted with the whole lineup of Republicans. Thompson, Guliani, McCain. Those 3 interrupted Romney big time. I also got a partial read on Gingrich&#8217;s interview with James Dobson when the campaign was in it&#8217;s infancy. Suddenly, he is no longer considering running. I have listened to him many times on Hannity&#8217;s programs. Up until that Dobson interview, I had no idea this guy was married 3 times.<br />
I lost respect for him immediatley. That group of guys had like 8 or 9 marriages between them.<br />
Sorry, but I gotta have a whole package deal. If you are screwing up your own family, your kids from your first marriage can&#8217;t stand you. What makes you think the idea of conservatism and values come through?<br />
Now Palin doesn&#8217;t have any of this. But by diverting into this issue of the teenager, she gives the O.K to the enemy to say &#8220;You see, they call themselves values people. &#8221; Do what Reagan did! Know it&#8217;s there, it will always be there. But let them keep falling into themselves by making an issue of it. Don&#8217;t help them with two part interviews and lessons on sexual behavior. Keep the kids away from those cameras. Please!<br />
Also, no need to defend Ann Coulter, I, believe it or not, am a fan of hers. I&#8217;m a bigger fan of her late father though. On her Get Drunk site, I made mention of his union busting days with the FBI. That&#8217;s just what I mean folks. He destroyed within. Those commies would have destroyed businesses a long time ago if not for her dad and guys like him. I just wish she could talk about Christian wives being submissive to their husbands and the nucleas of family with some experience. It would hold more water with people who share her concerns. Case Closed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135759</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135759</guid>
		<description>Steve, if some radical unfriendly liberals give you any trouble, make sure you have an abaya or burque with you hidden under your clothes. Slip in a restroom and presto. Just say &quot;wee-ooh wim-o-weh wim-o-weh, my civil rights ! my civil rights&quot; a few times, and they will leave you alone.   

Wish I could come and stand guard for ya all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, if some radical unfriendly liberals give you any trouble, make sure you have an abaya or burque with you hidden under your clothes. Slip in a restroom and presto. Just say &#8220;wee-ooh wim-o-weh wim-o-weh, my civil rights ! my civil rights&#8221; a few times, and they will leave you alone.   </p>
<p>Wish I could come and stand guard for ya all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135754</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135754</guid>
		<description>Kudos, Ward.

I wonder why bl makes such a dimwitted pitch: &lt;em&gt;They imitate the great conserv. past, but cannot equal! &lt;/em&gt; Who is their equal in the past?  All of those great people she mentioned, like &quot;Buckley, Reagan, Thatcher, Jean Kirkpatrick, Sen. Helms, Rev. Falwell, Ruth Graham (late wife of Billy Graham). &quot; don&#039;t do what Ann, Rush, and Sean have to do:  reveal themselves every time they speak.  

It&#039;s easy for us to cast stones at brave people like Beck, Levin, Rush, Laura, Tammy, Michael Reagan, Sean, Neal, etc., because we have them at a disadvantage:  we know a lot about them because they revealed their lives to us.  You and I haven&#039;t told them all about our failings, shortfalls, crimes, etc.

It&#039;s easy to criticize these Socrates of our times, but you wouldn&#039;t be able to replace them with your sparkling clean moral record, bl.  Your cleanliness wouldn&#039;t have anything to say that could connect with us mere mortals. 

For Rush, Laura, and the rest of the talk radio hosts it&#039;s relentless.  Three hours a day of searching your mind and soul for ways to relate to an audience of millions.  And Ann has to do it through books with intense content (truths, for those who can take it), plus doing news channel segments throughout the year and then more intensely in order to publicize her books.

Buckley wrote great books, but he broke up the intensity a bit and wrote a lot of fiction.  His appearances on tv were mainly confined to PBS, and didn&#039;t have to make a living in front of hostile cameras and audiences as Ann does.

And speaking of having to earn a living with their talent, bl, have you ever tried doing it like they have?  No, I didn&#039;t think so.  If you had to make your way in this world with a skill or talent, you would know the answer to your question, &lt;em&gt;Where are those conservatives??&lt;/em&gt;

They aren&#039;t people like you who&#039;ve never tried anything but birthing babies, which isn&#039;t a talent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos, Ward.</p>
<p>I wonder why bl makes such a dimwitted pitch: <em>They imitate the great conserv. past, but cannot equal! </em> Who is their equal in the past?  All of those great people she mentioned, like &#8220;Buckley, Reagan, Thatcher, Jean Kirkpatrick, Sen. Helms, Rev. Falwell, Ruth Graham (late wife of Billy Graham). &#8221; don&#8217;t do what Ann, Rush, and Sean have to do:  reveal themselves every time they speak.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy for us to cast stones at brave people like Beck, Levin, Rush, Laura, Tammy, Michael Reagan, Sean, Neal, etc., because we have them at a disadvantage:  we know a lot about them because they revealed their lives to us.  You and I haven&#8217;t told them all about our failings, shortfalls, crimes, etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to criticize these Socrates of our times, but you wouldn&#8217;t be able to replace them with your sparkling clean moral record, bl.  Your cleanliness wouldn&#8217;t have anything to say that could connect with us mere mortals. </p>
<p>For Rush, Laura, and the rest of the talk radio hosts it&#8217;s relentless.  Three hours a day of searching your mind and soul for ways to relate to an audience of millions.  And Ann has to do it through books with intense content (truths, for those who can take it), plus doing news channel segments throughout the year and then more intensely in order to publicize her books.</p>
<p>Buckley wrote great books, but he broke up the intensity a bit and wrote a lot of fiction.  His appearances on tv were mainly confined to PBS, and didn&#8217;t have to make a living in front of hostile cameras and audiences as Ann does.</p>
<p>And speaking of having to earn a living with their talent, bl, have you ever tried doing it like they have?  No, I didn&#8217;t think so.  If you had to make your way in this world with a skill or talent, you would know the answer to your question, <em>Where are those conservatives??</em></p>
<p>They aren&#8217;t people like you who&#8217;ve never tried anything but birthing babies, which isn&#8217;t a talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135753</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135753</guid>
		<description>Do you get the feeling that BL might be a steath lib, just trying to stir things up?

She walks like a duck (lib) acts like a duck (lib) so my guess is she just might be a duck (lib)

But maybe not.  But she does have a strange way of living what she says she believes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you get the feeling that BL might be a steath lib, just trying to stir things up?</p>
<p>She walks like a duck (lib) acts like a duck (lib) so my guess is she just might be a duck (lib)</p>
<p>But maybe not.  But she does have a strange way of living what she says she believes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135752</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135752</guid>
		<description>Being a conservative is not about being perfect.  

Its about being doing the RESPONSIBLE  thing.  Whether its standing by your child who does foolish things or by owning up to your own mistakes and correcting the consequences as best as you can.

It&#039;s all about the EFFORT to do the right thing.  

And anyway, who&#039;s to say what the right thing is for any one person.  It&#039;s when one person&#039;s &quot;right thing&quot; spills over into a demand in another&#039;s life that we have problems.

But hey, people have their imperfections and always will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a conservative is not about being perfect.  </p>
<p>Its about being doing the RESPONSIBLE  thing.  Whether its standing by your child who does foolish things or by owning up to your own mistakes and correcting the consequences as best as you can.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about the EFFORT to do the right thing.  </p>
<p>And anyway, who&#8217;s to say what the right thing is for any one person.  It&#8217;s when one person&#8217;s &#8220;right thing&#8221; spills over into a demand in another&#8217;s life that we have problems.</p>
<p>But hey, people have their imperfections and always will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135749</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135749</guid>
		<description>If the only thing a conservative can say on a liberal talk show is, &quot;But... I think that.....but......you are twisting what I am sayin--but......I ....hold on a minute........Um...&quot; ----That doesn&#039;t show bravery, it demonstrates that conservatives are not able to articulate their point. SURE it is set up that way, so my point is that they shouldn&#039;t willingly go there and be set up, it&#039;s stupidity. 

2nd: The audience is stupid as well. No one is going to observe that the host asked loaded questions, or that they were rude, or any of that nonsense. All they hear is a bleeding-heart liberal question, a stumbling conservative answer, and a 15 minute follow-up briefing of the liberal talking points. 

Besides that, Ann Coulter&#039;s body language, aggressive/combative demeanor, sarcastic answers, non-smiling composure is NOT going to change even 1 person&#039;s mind. YES SHE IS 100% RIGHT, but the liberals have set her up to simply look like a bitch, and it is working. 

Again, why bother? Why hurt your own cause? ---That seems counter-productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the only thing a conservative can say on a liberal talk show is, &#8220;But&#8230; I think that&#8230;..but&#8230;&#8230;you are twisting what I am sayin&#8211;but&#8230;&#8230;I &#8230;.hold on a minute&#8230;&#8230;..Um&#8230;&#8221; &#8212;-That doesn&#8217;t show bravery, it demonstrates that conservatives are not able to articulate their point. SURE it is set up that way, so my point is that they shouldn&#8217;t willingly go there and be set up, it&#8217;s stupidity. </p>
<p>2nd: The audience is stupid as well. No one is going to observe that the host asked loaded questions, or that they were rude, or any of that nonsense. All they hear is a bleeding-heart liberal question, a stumbling conservative answer, and a 15 minute follow-up briefing of the liberal talking points. </p>
<p>Besides that, Ann Coulter&#8217;s body language, aggressive/combative demeanor, sarcastic answers, non-smiling composure is NOT going to change even 1 person&#8217;s mind. YES SHE IS 100% RIGHT, but the liberals have set her up to simply look like a bitch, and it is working. </p>
<p>Again, why bother? Why hurt your own cause? &#8212;That seems counter-productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135745</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135745</guid>
		<description>BL - one I&#039;ve met Ann (last year at CPAC) and she is the sweetest person I&#039;ve met in a long time. And maybe you should get a clue - she was born in &#039;61 - to parents who were married from 1953 until her fathers death early last year (55 years). Your description doesn&#039;t fit - if you don&#039;t like how she dresses - so what, it&#039;s her choice, her life. If you don&#039;t like her sitting with men to discuss politics - wow I really do feel sorry for you.

You throw concepts out without thinking - that is a liberal tactic. And it was the point I was trying to make earlier - everyone can (and usually does) make a mistake - it is our ability to forgive (i.e. if you will see the humanity of it) and as that person to get up, take responsibility, dust yourself off and then try never ever to do it again.

Reagan wasn&#039;t perfect - he was a democrat, he was divorced, he was from California. He saw the failings in his life, set about to change them and became a much better person. And then he set about trying to help America.

And for your own example - look at Sarah Palin - a great example of someone living what they believe and the Dems set out to annihilate her and you bought into it. She was a hypocrit to you, not a person trying to do the right thing in a world gone wrong.

And you have to wonder why there isn&#039;t anyone out there - Bush spent 8 years being damned if he did, damned if he didn&#039;t and Gov Palin took shots that a lesser person would have never survived. 

And it&#039;s because of people like you who claim to be on our side but hit out just as bad as those on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BL &#8211; one I&#8217;ve met Ann (last year at CPAC) and she is the sweetest person I&#8217;ve met in a long time. And maybe you should get a clue &#8211; she was born in &#8216;61 &#8211; to parents who were married from 1953 until her fathers death early last year (55 years). Your description doesn&#8217;t fit &#8211; if you don&#8217;t like how she dresses &#8211; so what, it&#8217;s her choice, her life. If you don&#8217;t like her sitting with men to discuss politics &#8211; wow I really do feel sorry for you.</p>
<p>You throw concepts out without thinking &#8211; that is a liberal tactic. And it was the point I was trying to make earlier &#8211; everyone can (and usually does) make a mistake &#8211; it is our ability to forgive (i.e. if you will see the humanity of it) and as that person to get up, take responsibility, dust yourself off and then try never ever to do it again.</p>
<p>Reagan wasn&#8217;t perfect &#8211; he was a democrat, he was divorced, he was from California. He saw the failings in his life, set about to change them and became a much better person. And then he set about trying to help America.</p>
<p>And for your own example &#8211; look at Sarah Palin &#8211; a great example of someone living what they believe and the Dems set out to annihilate her and you bought into it. She was a hypocrit to you, not a person trying to do the right thing in a world gone wrong.</p>
<p>And you have to wonder why there isn&#8217;t anyone out there &#8211; Bush spent 8 years being damned if he did, damned if he didn&#8217;t and Gov Palin took shots that a lesser person would have never survived. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s because of people like you who claim to be on our side but hit out just as bad as those on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135741</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135741</guid>
		<description>Because Brad there are two reasons One is to show that Conservatives aren&#039;t cowards and will walk knowingly into the lions den and be able to come out alive and Two so that maybe one, simply just one person in the audience will see the condescention and acknowledge it or hear what Ann is saying and want to hear/read more.

Conversions don&#039;t come by preaching to the choir - they come by taking the risk of walking into the enemy camp or at least up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because Brad there are two reasons One is to show that Conservatives aren&#8217;t cowards and will walk knowingly into the lions den and be able to come out alive and Two so that maybe one, simply just one person in the audience will see the condescention and acknowledge it or hear what Ann is saying and want to hear/read more.</p>
<p>Conversions don&#8217;t come by preaching to the choir &#8211; they come by taking the risk of walking into the enemy camp or at least up to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice L.</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135675</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135675</guid>
		<description>What on earth is J.P. Avlon doing at CPAC?  He is not a conservative - I consider him center to left and he calls himself a &quot;centrist&quot;.  Watch out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What on earth is J.P. Avlon doing at CPAC?  He is not a conservative &#8211; I consider him center to left and he calls himself a &#8220;centrist&#8221;.  Watch out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135669</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135669</guid>
		<description>BL, are you suffering from PMS or are you always like this?

&lt;em&gt;It’s nerve racking. You could always….always, rely on somebody coming along to be bold enough and say “STOP”, “I am here to just protect and serve”. &lt;/em&gt;  

For all of your certainty about how crucial to our side is behavior that looks like you (&quot;Low income people, never felt the need to use drugs, mess around before marriage, 2 great kids after the fact&quot;), let me remind you:  there are thousands of men dying or ready to die for you every day who don&#039;t live up to your ideals.  Yet they are as crucial to our cause as the Ann&#039;s, Rush&#039;s, and whomever else you disapprove of.  

Have you ever suited up with the BEST American men in this nation?  I have.  I jumped out of airplanes with them and went to war with them, and let me tell ya:  they don&#039;t always look like Reagan, Buckley, and Falwell.  For you to cry out that &quot;No one on our side looks like me!!!&quot; sounds like a petulant woman who&#039;s had too much time on her hands over the years, and has never been asked to sacrafice and DIE the way some of us with broken marriages, out-of-wedlock pregnancies, and yes, even &lt;em&gt;drug use&lt;/em&gt; in our past have.

&lt;em&gt;So it hurts me to see them go along and do what the other side does. &lt;/em&gt;  

Of course it hurts you!  You&#039;re so righteous that EVERYTHING hurts you!  HERE&#039;S A CLUE:  When you&#039;ve actually accomplished something &lt;em&gt;besides&lt;/em&gt; raising two kids without having more hardship come your way, let us all know.  Until you&#039;ve done something a little more skilled, talented, and brilliant like address millions of people every day without fail for 20 years, let us know.  When you&#039;ve left your little comfort zone to put on a US uniform and done something that risked your life &lt;em&gt;every day&lt;/em&gt; for years on end, come back and tell us again how let down you are in &quot;our side&quot;.

Something tells me that a little more experience outside of domestic civilian life would color your perspective a bit.

&lt;em&gt;But it stinks that she is the poster child for all that crap that came out of the 60’s. You don’t have to be married, have kids, stay home with the family. That was the libs big thing. What does she do? Sit with these Fox guys, married men, with her minis and say let’s talk politics. Gives them all a look that says “You shoulda married me you fool”. How does that come off as conservative? &lt;/em&gt;

This is about the biggest nonsequitor I&#039;ve come across in some time.  Frankly, BL, there&#039;s nothing wrong with Ann and how she appears on the news shows.  You&#039;re just jealous.  Whereas Ann can appear in an 8-minute segment under glaring cameras and an audience of millions while remaining beautiful, articulate, and hilarious (in other words, everything you aren&#039;t), you only see her as making the men around her horny!  You&#039;re pathetic!

Get over yourself, BL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BL, are you suffering from PMS or are you always like this?</p>
<p><em>It’s nerve racking. You could always….always, rely on somebody coming along to be bold enough and say “STOP”, “I am here to just protect and serve”. </em>  </p>
<p>For all of your certainty about how crucial to our side is behavior that looks like you (&#8221;Low income people, never felt the need to use drugs, mess around before marriage, 2 great kids after the fact&#8221;), let me remind you:  there are thousands of men dying or ready to die for you every day who don&#8217;t live up to your ideals.  Yet they are as crucial to our cause as the Ann&#8217;s, Rush&#8217;s, and whomever else you disapprove of.  </p>
<p>Have you ever suited up with the BEST American men in this nation?  I have.  I jumped out of airplanes with them and went to war with them, and let me tell ya:  they don&#8217;t always look like Reagan, Buckley, and Falwell.  For you to cry out that &#8220;No one on our side looks like me!!!&#8221; sounds like a petulant woman who&#8217;s had too much time on her hands over the years, and has never been asked to sacrafice and DIE the way some of us with broken marriages, out-of-wedlock pregnancies, and yes, even <em>drug use</em> in our past have.</p>
<p><em>So it hurts me to see them go along and do what the other side does. </em>  </p>
<p>Of course it hurts you!  You&#8217;re so righteous that EVERYTHING hurts you!  HERE&#8217;S A CLUE:  When you&#8217;ve actually accomplished something <em>besides</em> raising two kids without having more hardship come your way, let us all know.  Until you&#8217;ve done something a little more skilled, talented, and brilliant like address millions of people every day without fail for 20 years, let us know.  When you&#8217;ve left your little comfort zone to put on a US uniform and done something that risked your life <em>every day</em> for years on end, come back and tell us again how let down you are in &#8220;our side&#8221;.</p>
<p>Something tells me that a little more experience outside of domestic civilian life would color your perspective a bit.</p>
<p><em>But it stinks that she is the poster child for all that crap that came out of the 60’s. You don’t have to be married, have kids, stay home with the family. That was the libs big thing. What does she do? Sit with these Fox guys, married men, with her minis and say let’s talk politics. Gives them all a look that says “You shoulda married me you fool”. How does that come off as conservative? </em></p>
<p>This is about the biggest nonsequitor I&#8217;ve come across in some time.  Frankly, BL, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with Ann and how she appears on the news shows.  You&#8217;re just jealous.  Whereas Ann can appear in an 8-minute segment under glaring cameras and an audience of millions while remaining beautiful, articulate, and hilarious (in other words, everything you aren&#8217;t), you only see her as making the men around her horny!  You&#8217;re pathetic!</p>
<p>Get over yourself, BL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135588</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135588</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t know why Conservatives go on &quot;The (liberal) View&quot; Matt Lauer, Chris Matthews etc. It is a simple lawyer tactic to set up a long winded,  carefully crafted, question, then cut-off and frustrate the person answering who had no time to prepare an answer. 

Why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t know why Conservatives go on &#8220;The (liberal) View&#8221; Matt Lauer, Chris Matthews etc. It is a simple lawyer tactic to set up a long winded,  carefully crafted, question, then cut-off and frustrate the person answering who had no time to prepare an answer. </p>
<p>Why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135585</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpac-2009-schedule-for-next-saturday#comment-135585</guid>
		<description>I think a few here miss an important point about Sarah Palin:  she stepped up and did the hard thing when so many others don&#039;t, today.  The mother lived by her conservative principles by ignoring the option of abortion when, at 43, she must have been told was an understandable route to take during the pregnancy.

And what about her daughter?  That young girl &lt;em&gt;easily&lt;/em&gt; could have followed the &quot;girls gone wild&quot; mentality of her generation by having an abortion, &lt;em&gt; but she came from a Conservative family&lt;/em&gt; and a fetus was allowed to live.

If all you can see when you look at people who don&#039;t make their personal life decisions OUR problems to deal with [Rush, Sarah Palin, etc], is people with a fourth wife or out-of-wedlock pregnancy, I ask you all to back off a bit and remember:  He who points at the moon is not the moon.  

Don&#039;t expect perfection from those who explain Conservative thought.  Ask yourself:  Are their life decisions impacting on me?  If the answer is &#039;no&#039; [which it is in both Rush and Sarah&#039;s daughter&#039;s cases], then you need to employ a little understanding in this thing called life, don&#039;t ya&#039; think?

And another thing, Brad:  Your complaint that Ann&#039;s &quot;schtick&quot; isn&#039;t &quot;bringing people to our party&quot; betrays your depth of conviction to Conservative principles, or lack, thereof.  Conservatism isn&#039;t a &quot;party&quot;.  Country-club Republicans are the type who express your sentiment concerning true believers of first principles of our nation&#039;s Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and over 200 years of respecting the rule of law.  They are called Conservatives, and the country-club types are the shallow lunkheads who don&#039;t understand those of us who live on next to nothing yet preach a Conservative message.  The merchant class knows how to count members in their party, but they don&#039;t know how they got there.

Without the Ann Coulter&#039;s, the Thomas Paine&#039;s, and the Rush Limbaugh&#039;s, the &quot;Party&quot; wouldn&#039;t have a Reagan.  Or a soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a few here miss an important point about Sarah Palin:  she stepped up and did the hard thing when so many others don&#8217;t, today.  The mother lived by her conservative principles by ignoring the option of abortion when, at 43, she must have been told was an understandable route to take during the pregnancy.</p>
<p>And what about her daughter?  That young girl <em>easily</em> could have followed the &#8220;girls gone wild&#8221; mentality of her generation by having an abortion, <em> but she came from a Conservative family</em> and a fetus was allowed to live.</p>
<p>If all you can see when you look at people who don&#8217;t make their personal life decisions OUR problems to deal with [Rush, Sarah Palin, etc], is people with a fourth wife or out-of-wedlock pregnancy, I ask you all to back off a bit and remember:  He who points at the moon is not the moon.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t expect perfection from those who explain Conservative thought.  Ask yourself:  Are their life decisions impacting on me?  If the answer is &#8216;no&#8217; [which it is in both Rush and Sarah's daughter's cases], then you need to employ a little understanding in this thing called life, don&#8217;t ya&#8217; think?</p>
<p>And another thing, Brad:  Your complaint that Ann&#8217;s &#8220;schtick&#8221; isn&#8217;t &#8220;bringing people to our party&#8221; betrays your depth of conviction to Conservative principles, or lack, thereof.  Conservatism isn&#8217;t a &#8220;party&#8221;.  Country-club Republicans are the type who express your sentiment concerning true believers of first principles of our nation&#8217;s Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and over 200 years of respecting the rule of law.  They are called Conservatives, and the country-club types are the shallow lunkheads who don&#8217;t understand those of us who live on next to nothing yet preach a Conservative message.  The merchant class knows how to count members in their party, but they don&#8217;t know how they got there.</p>
<p>Without the Ann Coulter&#8217;s, the Thomas Paine&#8217;s, and the Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s, the &#8220;Party&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t have a Reagan.  Or a soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
