” … taking the profits out of basic needs like health care and energy … “

Or in other words, taking the incentives out of “basic needs like health care and energy” — which has proven time and time again to mean terrible shortages of “basic needs like health care and energy”

“ … and explore public ownership … “

“Public ownership” (also known as government control) has been extensively “explored” all over the world, and has proven every time to result in shortages, degradation and suffering. No further “exploration” is really required at this point. The results have been unambiguous.

I’m not a big fan of conspiracy theories or age-old prophesies, but I have come to believe that Obamy isn’t just lucky.

Another way to look at it is that until this year, all campaigns have been candidate-based. The candidates may have represented a philosophy (i.e., Lincoln, Roosevelt, Reagan, others), but the candidates emerged, they were not created (interestingly, Reagan may have been an exception to that).

But this year, as one looks at everything that happened, it seems clear that Obamy has been manufactured by a very long-term, concerted strategy by the left. In that sense, he is more of a Manchurian candidate, than we have ever seen.

And to combat that in the future, if we are so lucky as to have a future after a couple of years of this menace, the Republicans (or another group) are going to have to abandon the strategy of selecting a candidate via sealed-cage-wrestling matches, and get behind someone early, strongly, and with a ton of money. Romney or Jindal would both be good…..but wating until 2010 won’t make it.

As an example, it was widely thought that Romney’s religion would eliminate him, and that is one of the main reasons he didn’t get the nod. But look at the lunatic relationships Obamy had….and the left was able to overcome them with a smart strategy (I think they had multi-step tactical plans for every contingency laid out years in advance.). Romney’s religion could have been easily overcome in any number of ways, and might actually have been turned into a strength if handled correctly. But Romney, even with all his talent and money, was just one guy and a handful of advisors. Obamy had 300 advisors on foreign policy alone. A handful of guys aren’t going to beat an army.

Communist don’t identify themselves but focus on you identifying with them. If you understand their history and organization, everything going on right now makes perfect sense. Take for example our economic crisis. Rahm Emanual says that a crisis is an advantageous time to enact “their” agenda. In fact, it’s the communist agenda to create that crisis and expect people to act hastily. Everything our congress does leaves us weaker for the sake of some fabricated injustice or crisis. Our energy policies are the perfect example.
Another is racism. We’re constantly told that minorities suffer discrimination in America. Communist identify victims and perpetrators to insight an eventual crisis. They take advantage of differences like race, class, gender, etc. by convincing the selfish and weak that they’re oppressed. People start to believe their problems are because of discrimination even when they’re actually universal and indiscriminate.

If we buy the promises of utopia then everyday life does seem oppressive. Fact is we left Eden long ago and life has been a challenge since. History shows us that communism only leads to oppression and a lot of death. I urge you all to challenge it.

I do not think when Bill Gates started Microsoft or any other entrepreneur thought, “Boy I’m so glad I could start this business so everyone working here will be able to make the same amount of money as the next guy/gal and I definitely want to make sure we break even by spreading the incomes out evenly among everyone that works for me. Then when this company becomes worthless I know I can count on everyone to keep right on working even though they will not receive an income because I was able to pay them a wage that was FAIR.”

Do these people even know of or about Joe Stalin? He killed more people than Hitler for cryin-out-loud!! Are they aware of what it would be like to live under a Communist Regime?? How do these people keep from hurting themselves when they have a thought?? I am just flabbergasted!!!!!!!

It’s more than Soros. Obama popped from nowhere in 2004, with huge parts of his life missing (still are), 2 autobiographies written by 2 different people, a sanitized life, a multi-racial background with a built-in race card, a perfect family, clean and articulate, Harvard grad even though nobody knows how he got in, the Law Review editor even though he never wrote an article, and a skill at dissembling unmatched in modern times. Whenever something was about to go wrong, another miracle happened. The press was rock solid every step of the way. The wagon’s circled on-time, every time. Obamy never had to search long for plausible deniability, even when the issues would have tanked anybody else……as if all of the responses had been tested for years.

The left has been preparing this guy for decades. He is a manufactured candidate, and now the manufactured leader of the free world, with carte blanche to do the left’s bidding. That took a LOT more than a billion dollars, and a LOT more than the Koz Kids. In the meanwhile, the right was waging it’s typical internecine warfare, and stumbled into a candidate with guts but politics that nobody cared for, and a keystone kops campaign team.

I think all this goes back to the meeting George Soros and his buddies had after Bush’s re-election about why they didn’t win that time. Obama’s whole campaign had that manufactured ready-made feel of a scripted stage performance. Maybe it’s time for the right to do the same, have their own meeting of the top dawgs and plan the defeat of the Dems. Soros may have a lot of money, but his reach can’t extend forever.

Also, try as he might — and he ran for the Presidency four times — Mr. Debs never won an election.”

We shouldn’t give Obamy too much credit for winning elections. They have all been handed to him on a silver platter….this time by the Republicans in general and McCain in particular.

And even at that, the people deserving the “credit” are his handlers of the last 20 years, not Obamy himself. Like those of the Long March, they understood the value of long-range planning. Whereas McCain, for example, seems to be incapable of planning beyond his next potty break.

Taking the profits out of the auto industry has sure worked out well hasn’t it?

Here in Michigan this is one of the things employers feared most about an Obama victory. This would remove any rights of the employer. The unions are free to contact employees and get them to sign cards indicating an interest in a union and that would then count as a vote for a union. The secret ballot at least indicated the voice of the workers. Unions can also promise employees anything and employers have to be very careful in what they say to employees about unions.

“The EFCA, labor’s top priority, will make it easier for workers to join unions.” Boy, is that true. It will require no effort at all. Not even a vote. The secret ballot vote – the cornerstone of our democracy – will be tossed aside in favor of making it easier for unions to take over a workplace.

I’ve said this before, but if you want to look into the future of the USA just come to Detroit. And Obama has the governor of Michigan as one of his economic advisors on the transition team. That’s like having Bill Clinton head up an ethics committee.