Believe me when I say, ” I’m on your side of aisle on this!”

In light of current events, our original definition –– while accurate as far as it goes –– may have been too generous in that it did not focus sufficiently on the thuggish tactics and destructive aspects of Liberalism.

Here I have in mind current national security events such as deliberately ignoring Islamic jihad and terrorism, even in the officer corps of the Army; inattention to military requirements in Afghanistan and elsewhere; betrayal of America’s old allies; suspending missile defenses; dismantling our intelligence capability; cozying up to foreign dictators; open and undefended borders; and inattention to the threat of nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorist states. We also need to keep in mind economic events such as Obamacare in all of its ruthlessness, massive deficits, inattention to unemployment, cap and tax, destruction of small businesses, and bullying, confiscation and nationalization of large businesses. Our original definition also ignored Liberalism’s place in history.

Therefore, I offer the following revised definition of Liberalism, having tacked on three new paragraphs for your review and constructive comments:

Liberalism is a secular ideology which is completely out of touch with reality and which has been blessed by the media and academics with an aura of quasi-religious sanctity.

Its doctrine is Marxism. As such, Liberalism seeks: to promote class envy and a mythology of victimization; to enslave successful individuals and businesses, and to redistribute their wealth to moochers, freeloaders, and parasites; and to stifle and choke the human will to self-responsibility and the human drive to succeed and prosper.

Its aims are power (both for its own sake and as a means to control and remold human beings), theft (loot), and destruction of Western Civilization (Christendom).

Its method is to take control of a white, Christian country through abuse of the democratic process; then to give that country over to anti-white, anti-Christian migrants (legal or illegal, it hardly seems to matter) for colonization and occupation; to force the indigenous inhabitants to pay for their own dispossession through heavy taxation, affirmative action, indoctrination, endless crime, bloodshed, and humiliations, obliteration of their culture, and other means; to punish those who object to this treatment as “hate criminals,” and then to describe this whole monstrous process as “enrichment.”

Strong arm tactics, abuse of power, deployment of front groups and union thugs, broken promises, fraud, misrepresentation, and corruption are hallmarks of Liberalism, and permeate and color it through and through. Liberals misuse language shamelessly for propaganda and without regard to reality, humanity, or honor.

Liberals take delight in all manner of destruction. To this end they deliberately mishandle matters relating to national security, sovereignty, and military defense. Also to this end, Liberal robber gangs will impose unpopular socialist and redistributionist programs and make war on prosperity. In their pursuit of destruction, Liberals will unabashedly defy the will of the people, even targeting citizens (individually and in groups), political opponents, and news organizations for elimination as unsuitable elements, malcontents, and reactionaries: “unAmericans,” “extremists,” “terrorists,” “astroturfers,” “angry mobs,” “tea-baggers,” “teabag, anti-government people,” “enemy of America” (Fox News), “Republican hissy fits,” “foot-dragging, knuckle-dragging Neanderthals,” “naysayers,” “opponents of reform,” etc., characteristic of Liberal invective.

In historical terms, Liberalism remains the gravest threat to Western Civilization and individual liberty since the passing of the Black Death and the end of serfdom in the 14th century AD. If Liberalism were to disappear overnight, it would be a matter of widespread rejoicing and revival of spirituality, and would usher in an era of great happiness, freedom, security, prosperity, and progress.

In other words…lies.

P U L E E S E! As if most Americans won’t already be armed with information discrediting their lies, er, talking points. More proof how stupid or delusional our elected officials really are and why they all need replacing.

By the way, this Mr. Nadeam Elshami, mentioned in the 5th paragraph as point-man for the House bill and as “spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,” seems to be a bit of a man of mystery.

A hasty internet search reveals very little information about him. Only that he is a renegade from Reagan conservatism, of Egyptian heritage, has been praised by the Arab American Institute, and was the moving force behind Pelosi’s 2007 visit to the Syrian murderer-terrorist-dictator Assad.

That would be unconscionable

The system must be purged!!