<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems Plan Second &#8216;Stimulus&#8217; Boondoggle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdsand</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167319</link>
		<dc:creator>pdsand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167319</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lawmakers are considering myriad ways to accelerate job growth. In interviews, they mentioned road projects that can be counted on to employ people right away; loans to small businesses; incentives to companies that agree to manufacture products in the U.S; and special partnerships in which government tries to avert private-sector layoffs by picking up a share of employee wages.&quot;

Isn&#039;t this all exactly what the first stimulus bill did/didn&#039;t do?

Except for this new little wrinkle:

&quot;and special partnerships in which government tries to avert private-sector layoffs by picking up a share of employee wages&quot;

Number 1, scary.  
Number 2, there&#039;s no potential for fraud/favoritism there.  
Number 3, I thought the problem was that private sector employees were earning too much wages, shouldn&#039;t they all be taking pay cuts?  Problem solved.  
Number 4, just as soon as night follows day, if the government is paying part of our wages, they will want to set them, just the same as they did with the TARP funds.  
Number 5, they really will not stop until the government has taken over every aspect of our lives.

&quot;Other approaches include a 25-cent tax on each stock transaction&quot;

They really do think this is the age of the robber barons don&#039;t they?  That there&#039;s some fat, evil, white men smoking cigars in a little room making billions of dollars in the stock market and wiping their butts with poor people.  Stock transactions are now done principally by all of us.  By our retirement funds and mutual funds, by our pension funds and other institutional investors.  If you punish stock transactions you are punishing widows and orphans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lawmakers are considering myriad ways to accelerate job growth. In interviews, they mentioned road projects that can be counted on to employ people right away; loans to small businesses; incentives to companies that agree to manufacture products in the U.S; and special partnerships in which government tries to avert private-sector layoffs by picking up a share of employee wages.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this all exactly what the first stimulus bill did/didn&#8217;t do?</p>
<p>Except for this new little wrinkle:</p>
<p>&#8220;and special partnerships in which government tries to avert private-sector layoffs by picking up a share of employee wages&#8221;</p>
<p>Number 1, scary.<br />
Number 2, there&#8217;s no potential for fraud/favoritism there.<br />
Number 3, I thought the problem was that private sector employees were earning too much wages, shouldn&#8217;t they all be taking pay cuts?  Problem solved.<br />
Number 4, just as soon as night follows day, if the government is paying part of our wages, they will want to set them, just the same as they did with the TARP funds.<br />
Number 5, they really will not stop until the government has taken over every aspect of our lives.</p>
<p>&#8220;Other approaches include a 25-cent tax on each stock transaction&#8221;</p>
<p>They really do think this is the age of the robber barons don&#8217;t they?  That there&#8217;s some fat, evil, white men smoking cigars in a little room making billions of dollars in the stock market and wiping their butts with poor people.  Stock transactions are now done principally by all of us.  By our retirement funds and mutual funds, by our pension funds and other institutional investors.  If you punish stock transactions you are punishing widows and orphans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckk</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167316</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167316</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s unclear how much of the effort would be funded with deficit spending.&quot;

I had to read that line three times so see what I must be missing. It turns out I missed nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s unclear how much of the effort would be funded with deficit spending.&#8221;</p>
<p>I had to read that line three times so see what I must be missing. It turns out I missed nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167312</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167312</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Troubled by the rising jobless rate,&lt;/b&gt;

But not &quot;troubled&quot; for the same reasons that you or I would be troubled.  No.   He is troubled because of the potential for further plummeting approval ratings and the resultant expulsion of his lame ass out of office.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;I hope we don’t play around the edges with this and we do what will work. Invest the money now,” said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., who chairs the Congressional Black Caucus. “We have to create jobs, and we have to create them right away.”&lt;/b&gt;

This is perhaps the most laughable statement in the whole thing.  Wave a magic wand and *poof*, new jobs where none were before.  

In order for there to be jobs, there has to be a market that has a demand.  If the demand is not met, then more jobs are needed to fill the void.  At least, in a free-market economy, that&#039;s how it works.  Unless of course, you live in Califawwwnya where 40% of the population already works for the government and they are going to 4 day workweeks and laying people off.  

So this &quot;throw money at it&quot; to create jobs is perhaps the most telling statement from the black perspective I could ever read.  Blacks seem to know how to spend money but not so much on where it comes from, how it is made, why wealth even exists and how it can be destroyed.  I shake my head in the sadness of it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Troubled by the rising jobless rate,</b></p>
<p>But not &#8220;troubled&#8221; for the same reasons that you or I would be troubled.  No.   He is troubled because of the potential for further plummeting approval ratings and the resultant expulsion of his lame ass out of office.</p>
<p><b>&#8220;I hope we don’t play around the edges with this and we do what will work. Invest the money now,” said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., who chairs the Congressional Black Caucus. “We have to create jobs, and we have to create them right away.”</b></p>
<p>This is perhaps the most laughable statement in the whole thing.  Wave a magic wand and *poof*, new jobs where none were before.  </p>
<p>In order for there to be jobs, there has to be a market that has a demand.  If the demand is not met, then more jobs are needed to fill the void.  At least, in a free-market economy, that&#8217;s how it works.  Unless of course, you live in Califawwwnya where 40% of the population already works for the government and they are going to 4 day workweeks and laying people off.  </p>
<p>So this &#8220;throw money at it&#8221; to create jobs is perhaps the most telling statement from the black perspective I could ever read.  Blacks seem to know how to spend money but not so much on where it comes from, how it is made, why wealth even exists and how it can be destroyed.  I shake my head in the sadness of it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167304</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167304</guid>
		<description>Air Strike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Air Strike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167303</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167303</guid>
		<description>When one bullet isn&#039;t enough..............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When one bullet isn&#8217;t enough&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeblough</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167301</link>
		<dc:creator>joeblough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167301</guid>
		<description>One would expect that the Democrats were adequately stimulated by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One would expect that the Democrats were adequately stimulated by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gila Monster</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167293</link>
		<dc:creator>Gila Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167293</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The renewed push to create jobs is driven by a recognition that the $787 billion stimulus program enacted in February is not a sufficient remedy for an unemployment rate that stands at 10.2 percent.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What..!!  The LA Slimes reporting that Barack Hussein&#039;s oft vaunted &quot;stimulus program&quot; really isn&#039;t working..??   Say it ain&#039;t so..!!
Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus and I believe a pig just flew by my window.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;The renewed push to create jobs is driven by a recognition that the $787 billion stimulus program enacted in February is not a sufficient remedy for an unemployment rate that stands at 10.2 percent.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What..!!  The LA Slimes reporting that Barack Hussein&#8217;s oft vaunted &#8220;stimulus program&#8221; really isn&#8217;t working..??   Say it ain&#8217;t so..!!<br />
Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus and I believe a pig just flew by my window&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167289</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167289</guid>
		<description>It would be funny if it wasn&#039;t so pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be funny if it wasn&#8217;t so pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167288</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167288</guid>
		<description>Tens of Billions of dollars for what? Twenty eight jobs if we goes by past performances by Ali Bama and his Den of Thieves!
Clueless beaches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tens of Billions of dollars for what? Twenty eight jobs if we goes by past performances by Ali Bama and his Den of Thieves!<br />
Clueless beaches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillK</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167287</link>
		<dc:creator>BillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/dems-plan-second-stimulus-boondoggle#comment-167287</guid>
		<description>From the fans of Pelosi and Boxer at the Los Angeles Times:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Democratic lawmakers plan quick push to boost employment&lt;/b&gt;

By Peter Nicholas

Troubled by the rising jobless rate, President Barack Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress are assembling a jobs package that would devote billions of dollars to projects meant to put people back on payrolls in 2010 and keep them working…

http://www.denverpost.com/frontpage/ci_13875661&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, &lt;b&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/b&gt; why the deficit is bad - because Americans aren&#039;t &quot;getting anything for it.&quot;  Sorry, never knew that.

It&#039;s all OK if Americans get their goodies, right?

Unfortunately, far, far too many Americans agree.  Gimme free health care, gimme a make work &lt;b&gt;union&lt;/b&gt;  job.

Who cares if even China will soon reach their limit of financing our debt.

Not to mention that, as was the case with FDR&#039;s CCC, when the Government spending ends, so do these jobs.

I guess Democrats will just need to keep passing multi-billion dollar jobs programs forever.

That&#039;s how they get reelected, and Americans will do so, lest their freebies end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the fans of Pelosi and Boxer at the Los Angeles Times:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Democratic lawmakers plan quick push to boost employment</b></p>
<p>By Peter Nicholas</p>
<p>Troubled by the rising jobless rate, President Barack Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress are assembling a jobs package that would devote billions of dollars to projects meant to put people back on payrolls in 2010 and keep them working…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/frontpage/ci_13875661" rel="nofollow">http://www.denverpost.com/frontpage/ci_13875661</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, <b>that&#8217;s</b> why the deficit is bad &#8211; because Americans aren&#8217;t &#8220;getting anything for it.&#8221;  Sorry, never knew that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all OK if Americans get their goodies, right?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, far, far too many Americans agree.  Gimme free health care, gimme a make work <b>union</b>  job.</p>
<p>Who cares if even China will soon reach their limit of financing our debt.</p>
<p>Not to mention that, as was the case with FDR&#8217;s CCC, when the Government spending ends, so do these jobs.</p>
<p>I guess Democrats will just need to keep passing multi-billion dollar jobs programs forever.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how they get reelected, and Americans will do so, lest their freebies end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

