« | »

Deputy Secretary Of NATO: Russia Now An Adversary

From the Associated Press:

NATO official: Russia now an adversary

By ROBERT BURNS | May 1, 2014

WASHINGTON (AP) — After two decades of trying to build a partnership with Russia, NATO now feels compelled to start treating Moscow as an adversary, the alliance’s second-ranking official said Thursday.

"Clearly the Russians have declared NATO as an adversary, so we have to begin to view Russia no longer as a partner but as more of an adversary than a partner," said Alexander Vershbow, the deputy secretary-general of NATO.

Where does Mitt Romney go to get his reputation back? Remember how Obama mocked Romney for saying in the final Presidential debate that Russia was America’s top geo-political adversary? Remember how the news media and the rest of the Democrat Party continued to mock Romney?

In a question-and-answer session with a small group of reporters, Vershbow said Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its apparent manipulation of unrest in eastern Ukraine have fundamentally changed the NATO-Russia relationship.

Vershbow, a former U.S. diplomat and onetime Pentagon official, said[:] "We still would defend the sovereignty and freedom of choice of Russia’s neighbors, and Russia clearly is trying to re-impose hegemony and limit their sovereignty under the guise of a defense of the Russian world."

In April, NATO suspended all "practical civilian and military cooperation" with Russia, although Russia has maintained its diplomatic mission to NATO, which was established in 1998…

Vershbow said NATO, created 65 years ago as a bulwark against the former Soviet Union, is considering new defensive measures aimed at deterring Russia from any aggression against NATO members along its border, such as the Baltic states that were once part of the Soviet Union, Vershbow said.

Vershbow, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO, said that among possible moves by NATO is deployment of more substantial numbers of allied combat forces to Eastern Europe, either permanently or on a rotational basis.

For the time being, he said, such defensive measures would be taken without violating the political pledge NATO made in 1997 when it established a new relationship with Moscow on terms aimed at offsetting Russian anger at the expansion of NATO to include Poland and other nations on Russia’s periphery. At the time, NATO said it would not station nuclear weapons or substantial numbers of combat troops on the territory of those new members. For its part, Moscow pledged to respect the territorial integrity of other states…

So we are now going to put nuclear weapons in Eastern Europe? Putin knows Obama would never allow such a thing.

Vershbow argued that Russia has violated its part of that agreement by its actions in Ukraine, and thus, "we would be within our rights now" to set aside the 1997 commitment by permanently stationing substantial numbers of combat troops in Poland or other NATO member nations in Eastern Europe…

NATO won’t do that, either. And Putin also knows that.

This article was posted by Steve Gilbert on Friday, May 2nd, 2014. Comments are currently closed.

2 Responses to “Deputy Secretary Of NATO: Russia Now An Adversary”

  1. Astravogel

    If you examine the history of the media vs Republican office holders
    back to about 1960 you will find that this ‘yapping dog syndrome’ is
    very common, and increasing geometrically. If you yell loudly enough
    the point of view you are opposing gets drowned out. Once this has
    happened all you have is one viewpoint presented. Competent people
    begin to realize it is not worth the hassle to serve the people and the
    country is worse off for this. Of course, the media will not listen to that,
    as it is contrary to their prejudiced beliefs, and the band plays on.




« Front Page | To Top
« | »