<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AP: House Dems Face Trouble In 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161443</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161443</guid>
		<description>With a potential loss of funding, they may stand to lose a lot of ground.   Let&#039;s hope Pelosi and Fwank use what little brains they have to remove all fed money from the pockets of the HATECORN operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a potential loss of funding, they may stand to lose a lot of ground.   Let&#8217;s hope Pelosi and Fwank use what little brains they have to remove all fed money from the pockets of the HATECORN operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tater Salad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161439</link>
		<dc:creator>Tater Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161439</guid>
		<description>http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-hr615/show

Lets see who in Congress are the real hypocrits with this legislation...H.R. 615</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-hr615/show" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-hr615/show</a></p>
<p>Lets see who in Congress are the real hypocrits with this legislation&#8230;H.R. 615</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161346</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161346</guid>
		<description>The more I hear from Jim Demint, the moe I like what he says.

He was elected to the House in 98 and the Senate in 04.  He is ranked as the most conservative member (which might be a negative in a national election....but heh, the Moron was ranked as the most liberal member).

He seems kind of boring, but maybe the country is ready for an adult instead of an mtv denizon.

He&#039;s still married to the one he brought to the dance, but you never know, Sanford seemed like a straigh arrow 6 months ago as well.

Does anybody know anything about him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I hear from Jim Demint, the moe I like what he says.</p>
<p>He was elected to the House in 98 and the Senate in 04.  He is ranked as the most conservative member (which might be a negative in a national election&#8230;.but heh, the Moron was ranked as the most liberal member).</p>
<p>He seems kind of boring, but maybe the country is ready for an adult instead of an mtv denizon.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s still married to the one he brought to the dance, but you never know, Sanford seemed like a straigh arrow 6 months ago as well.</p>
<p>Does anybody know anything about him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12 Gauge Rage</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161274</link>
		<dc:creator>12 Gauge Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161274</guid>
		<description>If we do take back both houses in 2010 then we&#039;d better have our act together because our fellow Americans will want to see what&#039;s the alternative to the bums we just voted out. I say the word &#039;if&#039; because you never know what ACORN will do to thwart the election process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we do take back both houses in 2010 then we&#8217;d better have our act together because our fellow Americans will want to see what&#8217;s the alternative to the bums we just voted out. I say the word &#8216;if&#8217; because you never know what ACORN will do to thwart the election process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptat</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161268</link>
		<dc:creator>ptat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161268</guid>
		<description>Good point Wardmama---you mention a grassroots movement to correct the House of Reps back to what it was meant to be. check out www.GOOOH.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Wardmama&#8212;you mention a grassroots movement to correct the House of Reps back to what it was meant to be. check out <a href="http://www.GOOOH.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GOOOH.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptat</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161267</link>
		<dc:creator>ptat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161267</guid>
		<description>How great is that clip? Why can&#039;t we see more men and women like Mr. McCotter in leadership? Thank God for this man and his civility, brilliance and simplicity! thanks to you , too, Laree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How great is that clip? Why can&#8217;t we see more men and women like Mr. McCotter in leadership? Thank God for this man and his civility, brilliance and simplicity! thanks to you , too, Laree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161261</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161261</guid>
		<description>Condi would be great!  It doesn&#039;t appear that she wants the spotlight, though.  She is a wonderful lady.

PR: A homegrown candidate would be super.  I&#039;ll try that angle with my wife tonight &#039;But honey, it&#039;s for the country!&#039; ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Condi would be great!  It doesn&#8217;t appear that she wants the spotlight, though.  She is a wonderful lady.</p>
<p>PR: A homegrown candidate would be super.  I&#8217;ll try that angle with my wife tonight &#8216;But honey, it&#8217;s for the country!&#8217; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161255</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161255</guid>
		<description>&quot;it’s getting tougher and tougher to find good people to run for office&quot;

Exactly.  Who wants to subject themselves to that abuse?   It&#039;s a huge problem.

Maybe conservatives need to do what the Left did with Obamy.  Grow our very own puppet.  Get him or her young.  Select for physical characteristcs, insulate, protect, train, scrub/enhance the back story, purge the records, buyoff or purge acquaintances, build a mythology, spend years developing strategies to mask the flaws, practice practice practice obsuscation, create an army of propagandists, control the media channels, flood the market with more lies that can ever be tracked down.  We could call him Raeagenstein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it’s getting tougher and tougher to find good people to run for office&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly.  Who wants to subject themselves to that abuse?   It&#8217;s a huge problem.</p>
<p>Maybe conservatives need to do what the Left did with Obamy.  Grow our very own puppet.  Get him or her young.  Select for physical characteristcs, insulate, protect, train, scrub/enhance the back story, purge the records, buyoff or purge acquaintances, build a mythology, spend years developing strategies to mask the flaws, practice practice practice obsuscation, create an army of propagandists, control the media channels, flood the market with more lies that can ever be tracked down.  We could call him Raeagenstein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161254</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161254</guid>
		<description>Condoleezza Rice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Condoleezza Rice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161247</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161247</guid>
		<description>DW and Pro: it&#039;s getting tougher and tougher to find good people to run for office.  Why would you want to spend hundreds, perhaps thousands of your own hours, thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of your own dollars, endure a mental colo-rectal examination of your own life since 2nd grade, and then go make $120k and have to live in DC with that salary.  Just a few thoughts...

And, yes, I understand that there are far more altruistic reasons to run than just money, but it&#039;s the personal humiliation that is vulgar.  And only getting worse - especially for those not on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DW and Pro: it&#8217;s getting tougher and tougher to find good people to run for office.  Why would you want to spend hundreds, perhaps thousands of your own hours, thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of your own dollars, endure a mental colo-rectal examination of your own life since 2nd grade, and then go make $120k and have to live in DC with that salary.  Just a few thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>And, yes, I understand that there are far more altruistic reasons to run than just money, but it&#8217;s the personal humiliation that is vulgar.  And only getting worse &#8211; especially for those not on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161246</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161246</guid>
		<description>And you might have also been confused!  In our local paper today, the front section heralded &#039;predictions of a recovery&#039; while the business section discussed how bad the &#039;economy and unemployment&#039; were.  Hmmm...

Tough to keep their story straight sometimes...  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you might have also been confused!  In our local paper today, the front section heralded &#8216;predictions of a recovery&#8217; while the business section discussed how bad the &#8216;economy and unemployment&#8217; were.  Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Tough to keep their story straight sometimes&#8230;  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DW</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161245</link>
		<dc:creator>DW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161245</guid>
		<description>OK Pro. Thanks for the responses.

I hope I at least brought up a point to ponder for those who peruse this site and wish for better for the US. 
Anyways, I gotta run for now. 
You have yourself a good night, Sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Pro. Thanks for the responses.</p>
<p>I hope I at least brought up a point to ponder for those who peruse this site and wish for better for the US.<br />
Anyways, I gotta run for now.<br />
You have yourself a good night, Sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161244</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161244</guid>
		<description>AP&#039;s Beth Fouhy is either confused, has not read the health bill, or believes that Obama had majic beans that sprouted &amp; grew money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AP&#8217;s Beth Fouhy is either confused, has not read the health bill, or believes that Obama had majic beans that sprouted &amp; grew money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161242</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161242</guid>
		<description>DW, I&#039;m of the school of thought (for the moment) that wants to devote 100% to hanging the Radical Criminals with their own rope.

It&#039;s hard to disagree that we need some responsible leadership on our side as well, but frankly, I&#039;m a bit worried that we will have the typical internicene warfare and that the blood-sucking press will use that against us.

I&#039;m hoping against hope that our side will be smart and not cut each other to shreds in 2012.  I doubt it will happen in 2010, because it will all be local elections.  But 2012 could be ugly with Obamy&#039;s blood in the water.

I&#039;m also hoping that someone will rise up and take charge.  I don&#039;t see that person yet, but there is lots of time for it to happen.   Every contender in the Repub field, unfortunately, is seriously flawed for one reaon or another.  I&#039;m embarrassed to say now that I was hoping that Mark Sanford would be the one.  Go figger.

I also wish the top 10 people would go off together for a week to study each other&#039;s pros and cons, and come together behind the two they think would have the best shot.  That would require them to be Patriots instead of Politicians, so it&#039;s probably a pipe-dream.

Since I don&#039;t really expect a Reagen to stride into the field, so all I can say for sure is that ANYBODY who opposes Obamy in 2012, will have 1000% of my support, and all the effort and money I can scratch up.

To your point about leadership with staying power, I also can&#039;t disagree with that.  I just don&#039;t want anybody to hold out hoping for a saint when one isn&#039;t likely to emerge.

I&#039;d vote for Ron Paul over the Moron.  That&#039;s how serious I am about it.

(ps....I&#039;m half expecting someone from Talk Radio to take a shot in 2012.  But I don&#039;t see a winner on the national stage there either, and I worry it could hurt more than help.  All of them are geniuses, but they have all also said many things that would be used against them.  Someone has already asked Hannity about it, you know, and he didn&#039;t reject it out of hand.  The one who would probably have the best shot is a second tier guy....Hugh Hewitt, for the reason that his incendiary level is lower than the tier 1 guys and gal.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DW, I&#8217;m of the school of thought (for the moment) that wants to devote 100% to hanging the Radical Criminals with their own rope.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to disagree that we need some responsible leadership on our side as well, but frankly, I&#8217;m a bit worried that we will have the typical internicene warfare and that the blood-sucking press will use that against us.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping against hope that our side will be smart and not cut each other to shreds in 2012.  I doubt it will happen in 2010, because it will all be local elections.  But 2012 could be ugly with Obamy&#8217;s blood in the water.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also hoping that someone will rise up and take charge.  I don&#8217;t see that person yet, but there is lots of time for it to happen.   Every contender in the Repub field, unfortunately, is seriously flawed for one reaon or another.  I&#8217;m embarrassed to say now that I was hoping that Mark Sanford would be the one.  Go figger.</p>
<p>I also wish the top 10 people would go off together for a week to study each other&#8217;s pros and cons, and come together behind the two they think would have the best shot.  That would require them to be Patriots instead of Politicians, so it&#8217;s probably a pipe-dream.</p>
<p>Since I don&#8217;t really expect a Reagen to stride into the field, so all I can say for sure is that ANYBODY who opposes Obamy in 2012, will have 1000% of my support, and all the effort and money I can scratch up.</p>
<p>To your point about leadership with staying power, I also can&#8217;t disagree with that.  I just don&#8217;t want anybody to hold out hoping for a saint when one isn&#8217;t likely to emerge.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d vote for Ron Paul over the Moron.  That&#8217;s how serious I am about it.</p>
<p>(ps&#8230;.I&#8217;m half expecting someone from Talk Radio to take a shot in 2012.  But I don&#8217;t see a winner on the national stage there either, and I worry it could hurt more than help.  All of them are geniuses, but they have all also said many things that would be used against them.  Someone has already asked Hannity about it, you know, and he didn&#8217;t reject it out of hand.  The one who would probably have the best shot is a second tier guy&#8230;.Hugh Hewitt, for the reason that his incendiary level is lower than the tier 1 guys and gal.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DW</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161240</link>
		<dc:creator>DW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161240</guid>
		<description>Fair point Pro.

But wouldn&#039;t it make sense to be at least looking for some half-decent people to take the reins back in &#039;10 (or even &#039;12)? 
From where I sit, no one seems to be even thinking about that. Taking the country back is important, no doubt. But isn&#039;t &lt;I&gt;keeping&lt;/I&gt; it equally important?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point Pro.</p>
<p>But wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to be at least looking for some half-decent people to take the reins back in &#8217;10 (or even &#8217;12)?<br />
From where I sit, no one seems to be even thinking about that. Taking the country back is important, no doubt. But isn&#8217;t <i>keeping</i> it equally important?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161237</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/election-trouble-for-house-dems-in-2010#comment-161237</guid>
		<description>Thoughts?

When you have a knife at your ribs and a gun to your head, take a slap in the face anytime.

Your question implies that the Criminal Cabal in the White House is just a couple of shades of red worse than the Republicans.

It&#039;s a false premise.

The Obama-insky&#039;s are a radical group of political criminals bent on destroying the country and ruling it as commissars.

To compare them to the bumbling Republicans is ludicrous.  There IS no comparison.

I don&#039;t care what kind of Keystone Kop McLame is, I&#039;ll jump on his bandwagon, Newt&#039;s bandwagon, Huckaby&#039;s bandwagon, Sarah&#039;s bandwagon, or Howdie Doodie&#039;s bandwagon if one can get rolling.

We&#039;ve all looked into the eye of the devil now, and there is no doubt what the fire looks like.

It would be dumb to quibble about details with people who are often stupid, and many are crooked......but there isn&#039;t a Republican in Congress who I think want&#039;s to replace the country with a Banana Republic Dictatorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>When you have a knife at your ribs and a gun to your head, take a slap in the face anytime.</p>
<p>Your question implies that the Criminal Cabal in the White House is just a couple of shades of red worse than the Republicans.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a false premise.</p>
<p>The Obama-insky&#8217;s are a radical group of political criminals bent on destroying the country and ruling it as commissars.</p>
<p>To compare them to the bumbling Republicans is ludicrous.  There IS no comparison.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what kind of Keystone Kop McLame is, I&#8217;ll jump on his bandwagon, Newt&#8217;s bandwagon, Huckaby&#8217;s bandwagon, Sarah&#8217;s bandwagon, or Howdie Doodie&#8217;s bandwagon if one can get rolling.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all looked into the eye of the devil now, and there is no doubt what the fire looks like.</p>
<p>It would be dumb to quibble about details with people who are often stupid, and many are crooked&#8230;&#8230;but there isn&#8217;t a Republican in Congress who I think want&#8217;s to replace the country with a Banana Republic Dictatorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

