<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA Suppressed Global Warming Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:23:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152627</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152627</guid>
		<description>But it gets even better - if you want to see this in full glory go over to Michelle Malkin&#039;s site:

 HR2454, American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, in the 300 page Amendment, Section B, Part H, Section 788 -

&lt;b&gt;[SECTION RESERVED]&lt;/b&gt;

I.E. LEFT BLANK TO FILL IN LATER.

Yepper that is what 219 of our vaulted &#039;representatives&#039; (hereafter called Klownposse in DC) in the House of Representatives voted for.

Come on people - We The People need to rise up and Stop The Insanity NOW. (July 4th is this weekend - good a time as any)

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it gets even better &#8211; if you want to see this in full glory go over to Michelle Malkin&#8217;s site:</p>
<p> HR2454, American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, in the 300 page Amendment, Section B, Part H, Section 788 -</p>
<p><b>[SECTION RESERVED]</b></p>
<p>I.E. LEFT BLANK TO FILL IN LATER.</p>
<p>Yepper that is what 219 of our vaulted &#8216;representatives&#8217; (hereafter called Klownposse in DC) in the House of Representatives voted for.</p>
<p>Come on people &#8211; We The People need to rise up and Stop The Insanity NOW. (July 4th is this weekend &#8211; good a time as any)</p>
<p>When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152328</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152328</guid>
		<description>Mr. Limbaugh is currently reading this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Limbaugh is currently reading this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enthalpy</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152310</link>
		<dc:creator>Enthalpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152310</guid>
		<description>This is a travesty as you said, but what recourse do we have? Those responsible should lose their jobs and pensions because this goes beyond simply breaking the law. They are providing fraudulent data to support the undermining of our capitalist system and taxing us all to death. Prison is too good for them.

What really bothers me about this is the issue of truth. How do we deal with people who see nothing wrong with their own truth and feel no obligation to be truthful with us. It seems to me that we can&#039;t live with these people.If there are no consequences for their lies, what&#039;s the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a travesty as you said, but what recourse do we have? Those responsible should lose their jobs and pensions because this goes beyond simply breaking the law. They are providing fraudulent data to support the undermining of our capitalist system and taxing us all to death. Prison is too good for them.</p>
<p>What really bothers me about this is the issue of truth. How do we deal with people who see nothing wrong with their own truth and feel no obligation to be truthful with us. It seems to me that we can&#8217;t live with these people.If there are no consequences for their lies, what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152262</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152262</guid>
		<description>the thing in the comments at that blog is what I was really getting at. 

It is &lt;a href=&quot;http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/25/source-inside-epa-confirms-claims-of-science-being-ignored-by-top-epa-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;expanded on here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the thing in the comments at that blog is what I was really getting at. </p>
<p>It is <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/25/source-inside-epa-confirms-claims-of-science-being-ignored-by-top-epa-management/" rel="nofollow">expanded on here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152257</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152257</guid>
		<description>Steve, However, they probably want to keep their jobs and pensions.

Exactly, the EPA just wants to exist. It is a worthless agency. They just give lip service in order to exist in name only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, However, they probably want to keep their jobs and pensions.</p>
<p>Exactly, the EPA just wants to exist. It is a worthless agency. They just give lip service in order to exist in name only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152242</guid>
		<description>Algore and his decepticons.   It&#039;s about funding, really.  The two walk hand-in-hand and as long as &quot;scientists&quot; forward the party message, they get their funding, which, coincidentally, part of which is their salaries....along with money to the institution of their employment.  

Corruption of the oldest kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Algore and his decepticons.   It&#8217;s about funding, really.  The two walk hand-in-hand and as long as &#8220;scientists&#8221; forward the party message, they get their funding, which, coincidentally, part of which is their salaries&#8230;.along with money to the institution of their employment.  </p>
<p>Corruption of the oldest kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MinnesotaRush</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152239</link>
		<dc:creator>MinnesotaRush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152239</guid>
		<description>Naw! You&#039;re kidding!

Now why, oh why, would they block a global warming report??????

Never mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naw! You&#8217;re kidding!</p>
<p>Now why, oh why, would they block a global warming report??????</p>
<p>Never mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152235</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152235</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the same story I just posted above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the same story I just posted above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152234</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152234</guid>
		<description>Theres a little more on &lt;a href=&quot;http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/25/online-global-warming-study-censored-by-epa/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;that story here&lt;/a&gt;.  Including in the comments section a posting by an EPA employee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theres a little more on <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/25/online-global-warming-study-censored-by-epa/" rel="nofollow">that story here</a>.  Including in the comments section a posting by an EPA employee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152233</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152233</guid>
		<description>Here is the original article, which blew the whistle on this travesty.

From the Competitive Enterprise Institute:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;CEI Releases Global Warming Study Censored by EPA&lt;/b&gt;

The Public Shouldn’t Be Kept in the Dark by an Agency Supposedly Committed to Transparency

by Richard Morrisontwitter
June 25, 2009

Washington, D.C., June 26, 2009—The Competitive Enterprise Institute is today making public an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency. Internal EPA email messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the Administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide. 

The report finds that EPA, by adopting the United Nations’ 2007 “Fourth Assessment” report, is relying on outdated research and is ignoring major new developments. Those developments include a continued decline in global temperatures, a new consensus that future hurricanes will not be more frequent or intense, and new findings that water vapor will moderate, rather than exacerbate, temperature. 

New data also indicate that ocean cycles are probably the most important single factor in explaining temperature fluctuations, though solar cycles may play a role as well, and that reliable satellite data undercut the likelihood of endangerment from greenhouse gases. All of this demonstrates EPA should independently analyze the science, rather than just adopt the conclusions of outside organizations. 

The released report is a draft version, prepared under EPA’s unusually short internal review schedule, and thus may contain inaccuracies which were corrected in the final report. 

“While we hoped that EPA would release the final report, we’re tired of waiting for this agency to become transparent, even though its Administrator has been talking transparency since she took office. So we are releasing a draft version of the report ourselves, today,” said CEI General Counsel Sam Kazman. 

http://cei.org/news-release/2009/06/25/cei-releases-global-warming-study-censored-epa&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the original article, which blew the whistle on this travesty.</p>
<p>From the Competitive Enterprise Institute:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>CEI Releases Global Warming Study Censored by EPA</b></p>
<p>The Public Shouldn’t Be Kept in the Dark by an Agency Supposedly Committed to Transparency</p>
<p>by Richard Morrisontwitter<br />
June 25, 2009</p>
<p>Washington, D.C., June 26, 2009—The Competitive Enterprise Institute is today making public an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency. Internal EPA email messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the Administration’s agenda of regulating carbon dioxide. </p>
<p>The report finds that EPA, by adopting the United Nations’ 2007 “Fourth Assessment” report, is relying on outdated research and is ignoring major new developments. Those developments include a continued decline in global temperatures, a new consensus that future hurricanes will not be more frequent or intense, and new findings that water vapor will moderate, rather than exacerbate, temperature. </p>
<p>New data also indicate that ocean cycles are probably the most important single factor in explaining temperature fluctuations, though solar cycles may play a role as well, and that reliable satellite data undercut the likelihood of endangerment from greenhouse gases. All of this demonstrates EPA should independently analyze the science, rather than just adopt the conclusions of outside organizations. </p>
<p>The released report is a draft version, prepared under EPA’s unusually short internal review schedule, and thus may contain inaccuracies which were corrected in the final report. </p>
<p>“While we hoped that EPA would release the final report, we’re tired of waiting for this agency to become transparent, even though its Administrator has been talking transparency since she took office. So we are releasing a draft version of the report ourselves, today,” said CEI General Counsel Sam Kazman. </p>
<p><a href="http://cei.org/news-release/2009/06/25/cei-releases-global-warming-study-censored-epa" rel="nofollow">http://cei.org/news-release/20.....nsored-epa</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152227</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/epa-hid-report-skeptical-of-g-warming#comment-152227</guid>
		<description>Viacom-owned CBS actually reveals the EPA&#039;s shenanigans:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;EPA May Have Suppressed Report Skeptical Of Global Warming&lt;/b&gt;

Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty &quot;decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data.&quot; ...

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/26/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5117890.shtml &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let&#039;s hope this has legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viacom-owned CBS actually reveals the EPA&#8217;s shenanigans:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>EPA May Have Suppressed Report Skeptical Of Global Warming</b></p>
<p>Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty &#8220;decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data.&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/26/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5117890.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2.....7890.shtml</a> </p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope this has legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
