Comments on: Fannie, Freddie Redirect Charity Funding

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Mon, 18 May 2009 21:23:09 +0000

I knew we couldn’t get through this article without the mention of Acorn and its’ greedy paws out!

WHEN IS ENOUGH GONNA BE ENOUGH?
OOOOOOO ……… I feel a RBTINI fit acomin’ !!
(pardon me folks ………. )

By: catie

catie — Mon, 18 May 2009 18:51:01 +0000

Yeah, it sort of resembles the Governor’s Palace in Colonial Williamsburg with the out buildings attached. It sure is a beautiful place though isn’t it?

By: pdsand

pdsand — Mon, 18 May 2009 18:50:13 +0000

That’s like the way inbev was able to buy anheiser-busch was because they promised to keep donating.

By: proreason

proreason — Mon, 18 May 2009 18:12:45 +0000

Well, I think the charity angle is significant by itself.

It’s another segment of our culture that has recently come under attack by the power-engorged Leftists.

Charities limit people’s dependance on government because they step in and help people get over rough patches in their lives…..displacing the all-seeing government from exercising it’s right to control everybody’s life so as to keep everybody in permanent servitude.

So Charities and charitable giving have become a huge problem that must be stamped out.

By: Right of the People

Right of the People — Mon, 18 May 2009 18:04:54 +0000

Looking at the picture of Fannie Mae’s HQ, I thought it was a picture of an English estate or at least Donald Trump’s summer home. No money wasted on frivolous this here. Steve, I guess it depends on what your definition of a “charitable cause” is. Just like Slick Willie’s definition of sex was. The natives are getting restless.