« | »

Hasan Lectured On ‘Islamic World View’

From those tireless defenders of the faith at the Washington Post:

Fort Hood suspect warned of threats within the ranks

Cited stress facing Muslims Hasan spoke at Walter Reed in 2007

By Dana Priest
Tuesday, November 10, 2009

The Army psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood warned a roomful of senior Army physicians a year and a half ago that to avoid "adverse events," the military should allow Muslim soldiers to be released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars against other Muslims.

As a senior-year psychiatric resident at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Maj. Nidal M. Hasan was supposed to make a presentation on a medical topic of his choosing as a culminating exercise of the residency program.

Instead, in late June 2007, he stood before his supervisors and about 25 other mental health staff members and lectured on Islam, suicide bombers and threats the military could encounter from Muslims conflicted about fighting in the Muslim countries of Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a copy of the presentation obtained by The Washington Post.

"It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims," he said in the presentation.

"It was really strange," said one staff member who attended the presentation and spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the investigation of Hasan. "The senior doctors looked really upset" at the end. These medical presentations occurred each Wednesday afternoon, and other students had lectured on new medications and treatment of specific mental illnesses.

An Army spokesman said Monday night he was unaware of the presentation, and a Walter Reed spokesman declined to comment. It is unclear whether anyone in attendance reported the briefing to counterintelligence or law enforcement authorities whose job it is to identify threats from within the military ranks

The title of Hasan’s PowerPoint presentation was "The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military." It consisted of 50 slides. In one slide, Hasan described the presentation’s objectives as identifying "what the Koran inculcates in the minds of Muslims and the potential implications this may have for the U.S. military."

He also sought to "describe the nature of the religious conflicts that Muslims" who serve in the U.S. military may have and to persuade the Army to identify these individuals.

Other slides delved into the history of Islam, its tenets, statistics about the number of Muslims in the military, and explanations of "offensive jihad," or holy war.

Another slide suggested ways to draw out Muslim troops: "It must be hard for you to balance Islamic beliefs that might be conflicting with current war; feelings of guilt; Is it what you expected."

Hasan’s presentation lasted about an hour. It is unclear whether he read out loud every point on each slide. If typical procedures were followed, his adviser would have supervised the development of his project, said people familiar with the practice.

The final three slides indicate that Hasan referred to Osama bin Laden, the Taliban, suicide bombers and Iran.

Under a slide titled "Comments," he wrote: "If Muslim groups can convince Muslims that they are fighting for God against injustices of the ‘infidels’; ie: enemies of Islam, then Muslims can become a potent adversary ie: suicide bombing, etc." [sic]

The last bullet point on that page reads simply: "We love death more then [sic] you love life!"

Under the "Conclusions" page, Hasan wrote that "Fighting to establish an Islamic State to please God, even by force, is condoned by the Islam," and that "Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly — will vary!"

The final page, labeled "Recommendation," contained only one suggestion:

"Department of Defense should allow Muslims [sic] Soldiers the option of being released as ‘Conscientious objectors’ to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events."

Well, what is he conscientiously objecting to? Certainly he had no qualms against violence. Since he preached that infidels should be beheaded.

The last bullet point on that page reads simply: "We love death more then [sic] you love life!"

Mr. Hasan’s comments sure sound a lot like those of his spiritual mentor, Mr. Anwar al-Awlaki.

But the most amazing thing is that people did not rush the stage and clap this lunatic (and poor speller) in irons.

This article was posted by Steve on Tuesday, November 10th, 2009. Comments are currently closed.

6 Responses to “Hasan Lectured On ‘Islamic World View’”

  1. beautyofreason says:

    Everything this terrorist did proves that Cheney’s opinion is spot on:
    the Obama administration has returned the country and government to a pre – 9/11 mentality, put on the kid gloves in approaching the subject of radical Islam, and as a result we have experienced another act of terrorism on our soil.

    The press has done everything they can to paint the terrorist as a stressed out guy who went postal for no ulterior motive, despite the fact that he was a cognizant Islamic brute stating his hate to virtually all.

    What a complete failure on the part of political correctness and our government.
    I felt safer when Bush was around.

  2. canary says:

    It was Obama’s call to request the ‘smiling’ Army Chaplain inviting the ‘smiling muslim extremists’ to go on to a Military Base, putting them in front of the those that are shedding tears, grieving, emotions of devastation, & fear. Military Experts know fully that when soldiers have been traumatized, they are to immediately be made to feel as safe as possible.

    Did Obama open the base & invite the pinkies as well?

    I only heard a bit, but immediately was struck by Obama’s terms of “these soldiers…these men and women…. not “our” soldiers, men, and women.

    Also, they need to change the 13 number to 14 murdered as Bush’s law requires in homicide.

    Also, I saw the Mexican woman interviewed again by Fox. She showed
    some of the items the Terrorist had given her, and said the FBI still had not asked for these items, Some investigation. Also, she spoke of how religious the terrorist was and nice. And ended in saying she still considered him nice, inspite of what he did, because he had given her things when she had nothing. He lived so meagerly for a military doctor with a 6 figure income. How sweet to give her the left over food in his refridgerator. Who could eat it? Who could keep the things given to them by a terrorist.

  3. canary says:

    Islam considers abortion as murder and does not permit it except to save the mother’s life (Quran 17:23-31, 6:15 1).

    So, let’s change the count from 13 to 14. so that Hasan won’t just be executed by military law, but by his own muslim religion law. Prehaps it takes the most
    torturous murder for him to make appeasment to his allah.
    Maybe the muslim punishment against killing an unborn baby, is to give all his money, land, and goats, to the family. It’s something to look into.

    • canary says:

      They have lot’s of law rulings like America. I never knew slavery is the norm in muslim. I realise the beheadings, stoning, doesn’t bother Obama much, but keeping men and women slaves?!!!! Aside giving a slave to two, or 50 camels (5 which must be carrying babying camels) each case is treated different just like in America. (p.s.) so many of these cases involve violence between the wives, so I guess there is some jealousy thee. they should learn from the old time fundamentalist mormans. Get rid of the young teen males, and the women are more grateful to share a husband.

      Book 034, Hadith Number 4555.
      ——————————
      Chapter : Bloodwit for an unborn child.

      Narated By Umar ibn al-Khattab : Ibn Abbas said: Umar asked about the decision of the Prophet (pbuh) about that (i.e. abortion) Haml ibn Malik ibn an-Nabighah got up and said: I was between two women. One of them struck another with a rolling-pin killing both her and what was in her womb. So the Apostle of Allah (pbuh) gave judgment that the blood-wit for the unborn child should be a male or a female slave of the best quality and that she should be killed.

      Abu Dawud said: Al-Nadr b. Shumail said: Mistal, means a rolling-pin.

      Abu Dawud said: Abu ‘Ubaid said: Mista1 means a pole from the tent-poles.

    • canary says:

      Plus, what a racist Hasan was. He just assumed muslims aren’t white. He did not even check given them a chance to convert or tell their beliefs. But, this slavery thing means that many living here in the U.S. and mosques may have slaves. They be the ones who have to strap the sucidie packs. Obama
      loves muslim slave owners that lynch, decapitate, and torture not just their relatives, but their slaves as well. This must be investigated in the U.S. and ever country like UK who is against slavery. How did Obama raised with muslims not know about this, along with the many young girl wives his ancestors paid cows for, hunted down and raped.

      The family of the unborn child needs to get a lien on all that money the muslim doctor has before his attorney get’s it all. (doubt he has camels)

  4. canary says:

    Here is the link. It is bizarre. Life for a life. How someone’s tooth is broke if they break yours. You can always accept payment. abortions are way down.
    http://www.clickislam.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=377&Itemid=142

    Book 34. Types of Blood-Wit
    Book 034, Hadith Number 4479.
    ——————————
    Chapter : Life for life.

    Narated By Abdullah Ibn Abbas : Qurayzah and Nadir (were two Jewish tribes). An-Nadir were nobler than Qurayzah. When a man of Qurayzah killed a man of an-Nadir, he would be killed. But if a man of an-Nadir killed a man of Qurayzah, a hundred wasq of dates would be paid as blood-money. When Prophethood was bestowed upon the Prophet (pbuh), a man of an-Nadir killed a man of Qurayzah.

    They said: Give him to us, we shall kill him. They replied: We have the Prophet (pbuh) between you and us. So they came to him.

    Thereupon the following verse was revealed: “If thou judge, judge in equity between them.” “In equity” means life for a life.

    The following verse was then revealed: “Do they seek of a judgment of (the days) ignorance?”

    Book 034, Hadith Number 4481.
    ——————————
    Chapter : If authorities ask relatives of a slain to forgo their right what should they do.

    Narated By Abu Shurayh al-Khuza’i : The Prophet (pbuh) said: If a relative of anyone is killed, or if he suffers khabl, which means a wound, he may choose one of the three things: he may retaliate, or forgive, or receive compensation. But if he wishes a fourth (i.e. something more), hold his hands. After this whoever exceeds the limits shall be in grave penalty.


« Front Page | To Top
« | »