<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Galloway Calls Mumbai Reporting Reckless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lipstick on a PIAPS</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless#comment-125678</link>
		<dc:creator>Lipstick on a PIAPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless#comment-125678</guid>
		<description>Thank God he didn&#039;t call those 10 terrorists reckless. He might have offended them and hurt their feelings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God he didn&#8217;t call those 10 terrorists reckless. He might have offended them and hurt their feelings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuppyNblue</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless#comment-125674</link>
		<dc:creator>GuppyNblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless#comment-125674</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there are any Muslim publications that Galloway might look into. Are their facts straight and do they avoid incendiary reporting? The double standards in the U.S. will evolve the same way until they become two sets of laws. 

Galloway is a lot like our Reid on the other thread. Little men, twisted by evil and clearly driven by it. They will arrest someone for loyalty but at the same time flaunt their own treason. If only the average Brit (or American) truly knew the alien garbage they elect to office. One thing that should clue them in is that when someone like us (maybe a Sarah Palin) starts to climb the political ladder, the left and their media find it outrageous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there are any Muslim publications that Galloway might look into. Are their facts straight and do they avoid incendiary reporting? The double standards in the U.S. will evolve the same way until they become two sets of laws. </p>
<p>Galloway is a lot like our Reid on the other thread. Little men, twisted by evil and clearly driven by it. They will arrest someone for loyalty but at the same time flaunt their own treason. If only the average Brit (or American) truly knew the alien garbage they elect to office. One thing that should clue them in is that when someone like us (maybe a Sarah Palin) starts to climb the political ladder, the left and their media find it outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillK</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless#comment-125610</link>
		<dc:creator>BillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/galloway-mumbai-reporting-reckless#comment-125610</guid>
		<description>If you want irresponsible reporting, several sources have noted that the terrorists knew exactly what was coming and when as the Indian news agencies carried &lt;b&gt;live video&lt;/b&gt; of the tactical assaults by law enforcement.

Who needs to post lookouts when you can just watch the live coverage instead?

Is there any doubt that if the 9/11 terrorists had, say taken WTC hostage instead, CNN and the networks would have gone live with any attempts by military strike teams to rescue them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want irresponsible reporting, several sources have noted that the terrorists knew exactly what was coming and when as the Indian news agencies carried <b>live video</b> of the tactical assaults by law enforcement.</p>
<p>Who needs to post lookouts when you can just watch the live coverage instead?</p>
<p>Is there any doubt that if the 9/11 terrorists had, say taken WTC hostage instead, CNN and the networks would have gone live with any attempts by military strike teams to rescue them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

