« | »

Gertz: Embassies Threat Was Known For Months

From the Washington Free Beacon:

Terror Threat Intelligence Not New

Agencies knew of threat to embassies, officials for months

By Bill Gertz | August 5, 2013

Intelligence regarding al Qaeda plans to attack U.S. embassies, officials, and interests last Sunday was known for months by U.S. intelligence agencies but was used only recently to trigger the closure of embassies and issuance of public warnings of impending attacks.

Al Qaeda “chatter” about coming terrorist operations, mainly against 22 U.S. embassies and consulates, and threats to attack or bomb officials in the Middle East and elsewhere was widely reported in classified intelligence reports over several months. The report said an attack was planned for Sunday, although no attack was carried out.

The intelligence was based on electronic surveillance of al Qaeda communications indicating some type of spectacular bombing or other attacks was being planned and would in fact be carried out very soon.

This is a pretty damning revelation, if true. If we had a month’s lead time on this, couldn’t we come up with a better response than tucking our tail between our legs and closing all of our embassies?

The timing of the administration’s announced closure of numerous U.S. embassies in the Middle East has raised concerns among some U.S. officials that the Obama administration is politicizing intelligence to distract attention from the Benghazi and other scandals.

“Why is this coming out now?” asked one official with access to terrorist threat data. “Is the administration trying to suck up news coverage with the embassy threats to distract attention from what the CIA was doing in Benghazi?”

In fact, CNN is airing a special tonight (at 10 pm Eastern), ‘The Truth About Benghazi.’

Press secretary Jay Carney told reporters at the White House Monday that “we take the threat very seriously and have taken action because of that.”

“I’m not in a position to discuss specific intelligence, but we believe that this threat is significant, and we are taking it seriously for that reason and have taken the actions that the State Department announced out of an abundance of caution and will continue to monitor this and take action as necessary,” Carney said…

But they have no problem leaking information on the methods and sources, if they think it will give them more credibility.

Former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Pete Hoekstra said he is concerned that the administration may be politicizing intelligence because “they have politicized everything.” “If there is any hint at all that this [latest terror threat] was politicized, it would be absolutely outrageous,” Hoekstra said in an interview.

“In an era of ‘phony’ scandals, let’s hope no one is playing politics with national security and threat alerts,” Hoekstra told the Washington Free Beacon, referring to President Obama’s recent dismissal of Benghazi and other administration scandals as “phony.”

A former White House intelligence official said suggestions the terror alert was hyped deserve the attention of the House and Senate intelligence oversight committees

For the Obama administration, the type of politicization of intelligence that has taken place under the president has created a situation where the average person has little confidence in claims that terrorists are planning major attacks.

“They have debased the coinage of the realm: trust,” the former official said.

“If you would lie about Benghazi and make up the story about the cause being a YouTube video, what else wouldn’t you do?” he asked.

Great harm has been done to the credibility of U.S. intelligence agencies by politicizing intelligence and one effect is that when terrorist alerts are issued, people question the government’s motives, the former official said.

“In that context, I think we’ve reached the point where the two congressional intelligence oversight committee should take a look into this, just to put the public’s mind at rest,” the former official said…

Lest we forget, we were regularly told by the news media and the rest of the Democrat Party that President Bush used terror threats to distract us from his domestic political problems all the time. And yet none of the mainstream media have dared to suggest Obama is doing that here.

Why is that? Is it really so far-fetched?

This article was posted by Steve Gilbert on Tuesday, August 6th, 2013. Comments are currently closed.

No Responses to “Gertz: Embassies Threat Was Known For Months”

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.




« Front Page | To Top
« | »