« | »

Ginsburg: Male Justices Didn’t Understand Hobby Lobby

From Mediaite:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Male Justices Didn’t Really Understand Hobby Lobby

By Matt Wilstein | July 31, 2014

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg … sat down for an extended interview with Yahoo News’ [perky] Katie Couric to explain why she found the [Hobby Lobby] decision so damaging.

“Contraceptive protection is something that every woman must have access to in order to control her own destiny,” Ginsburg told Couric. While she said she “respects the belief” of the Hobby Lobby owners, she added, “they have no constitutional right to force that belief on the hundreds and hundreds of women who work them who don’t share that belief.”

How does anyone force their belief on someone else by not buying them something?

“Do you believe that the five male justices truly understood the ramifications of their decision?” Couric asked later in the interview of the men who made up the majority. “I would have to say no,” Ginsburg replied after a pause.

So male justices shouldn’t be allowed to rule on issues involving women. Okay, then 81 year old Jewish women shouldn’t be allowed to rule on issues that don’t involve 81 year old Jewish women. Fair is fair.

“But, justices continue to think, and can change. So I’m ever hopeful that if the Court has a blind spot today, its eyes can be opened tomorrow.” …

Is Ms. Ginsburg trying to make a joke on herself? Isn’t she notorious for constantlyfalling asleep on the bench?

This article was posted by Steve Gilbert on Friday, August 1st, 2014. Comments are currently closed.

5 Responses to “Ginsburg: Male Justices Didn’t Understand Hobby Lobby”

  1. BannedbytheTaliban

    This is an egregious example of liberal duplicity. If people weren’t so stupid, this would stop anyone from voting democrat ever. Let me finish her honors thoughts so lo-vos can understand:

    “Contraceptive protection is something that every woman must have access to in order to control her own destiny”
    -because a woman is incapable of controlling her own sexual urges.

    ““they have no constitutional right to force that belief..” – but since our beliefs are superior, we have the right to force them on Hobby Lobby.

  2. I thought women controlled sex by saying No to men. Is the Rev. Ginsburg saying women are incapable of saying No?

    • Rusty Shackleford

      Comically rhetorical, of course.

      Women such as Ginsberg have hollowed out in their skulls a place whereby all men are evil and the cause of all that is wrong with the world, ignoring that the plight of most humans in the Western world also occurred while under the reign of queens.

      But, possibly given to the male-dominated scenery of the Jewish faith in her formative years, it caused her, like so many of her generation, to become angry at all the “injustice” and “unfairness” that women can’t play left tackle for the Redskins.

      And that MEN are CEO’s of corporations.

      And that MEN have penises and WOMEN don’t.

      Along with that, that WOMEN are the caregivers in the household while the MEN go out and earn a living.

      This brings about a quest for a forced, artificial and faulty “equality” in the world where WOMEN who are EMPOWERED, have all the shakes that MEN have and can just as easily bring about world-change as them.

      Thus, the story is never about equality, but anger. Anger that men get paid so much, that they have a certain type of ego-style, that they can stand up to pee and women can’t. (which isn’t really true, they can but choose not to for obvious reasons, I should think)

      Anyhow, I’d like to ask her, “So, why is it that women don’t play professional football?” and then proceed with a line of questioning to ultimately arrive at the biological fact that — Women have babies, men do not. Thus, the roles of parenting in the home are different.

      God made it that way for a reason…and it’s fine for the women who don’t want to have babies. Just remember, though, that actions have consequences. Been that way for —gee—tens of thousands of years, maybe?

      Fine, have a kid and be a professional…but at the same time don’t expect your kid to be overly excited to have you as their mom. As well as not having any dad around to speak of. I mean, gee. These are Life-Lessons 101.

      Then again, as GBJ said above, “Just say no.”. Works for me every time. She says no, I am left without. If she continues to say no, I leave. Simple. Not the basis for a good relationship, but one of the characteristic human traits that decides how to measure the quality of it.

      Typical leftists think everything happens in a vacuum.

      That care-free sex thing. Doesn’t exist. Never has. If one is truly that “care-free” then they court big diseases with little names, just to put one finer point to it. To sharpen it further, any relationship based on sex isn’t worth a spit.

      Socialists also assume that all people are the same; They assume that we all feel exactly the same about things as they do (or should) and if we don’t then what needs fixing is our minds, not theirs. Thus, as with Ginsberg, we always get “Arrogance On Parade”.

      Yep, women can be incredibly arrogant; It’s not an attribute solely occupied by menfolk.

      Hillary Clinton
      Lois Lerner
      Michelle Obama
      Kathleen Sebelius
      Nancy Pelosi

      The list goes on and has as many females as males on it.

      So, dear Ruthie, please shut up.

  3. captstubby

    “At the constitutional level where we work, 90 percent of any decision
    is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for
    supporting our predilections.”
    William O. Douglas

  4. yadayada

    I guess in ruth buzzi ginsburg’s world, to proclaim that the “male justices” were thinking with their penises cannot be considered a sexist statement

    showing how low information some people can be and also buzzi’s own tendency to promote straw men;
    contraception was not germane to the case. contraception is for the prevention of pregnancy. Hobby Lobby was about chemicals used to poison and destroy embryos




« Front Page | To Top
« | »