Let me use a stellar, clarifying example.

Germany and Japan. Once shredded, they acquiesced to rehabilitation politically. Certainly, there were many who preferred the voice of reason vs. mob rule and a better choice over dictatorship/empirical tyranny.

But an enemy not driven to utter destruction will never acquiesce to peace.

They will use any means necessary to continue their efforts to undo their enemy (that would be us)

Rehabilitation works occasionally but like any addiction, it only works if the addict WANTS it to.

And in this case, it’s not drugs or alcohol or even a violent nature. It’s an ideology. An ideology so diametrically opposed to our own that it really cannot be altered. Again, not unless the subject is willing to change. I’ve no desire to change them. I’ve only the desire to eradicate them from the face of the Earth, as they would have done unto me.

Once they are destroyed, then peace can flourish. I didn’t start it. My government didn’t start it. To those who think the US “deserves” it, is remarkably shortsighted. This “jihad” finds its roots all the way back to post Roman Europe when the muslims went on a jihad that lasted for quite some time, establishing strongholds in Spain and other places in Europe.

To say the religions of Christianity and islam are diametrically opposed is to say water is wet.

Somehow, the muslims, especially the radical ones just cannot leave things alone. I liken them to the baptists down the street who find everything the lutherans do to be wrong. Or, the catholics vs. the protestants. It’s the same old bigoted, ridiculous arguments over and over save that the radical muslims, no less dedicated to their religion than a radical catholic dedicated to the pope, are now armed with a refreshed zeal to dominate the land and may very well accomplish that which will set the world back about 1,000 years. No bathing, no rights for women (yet women’s advocacy groups seem more than a little enamored with muslims) and no education and the religious leaders dictating public policy.

This, of course, flies in the face of our Constitution and Bill Of Rights.

Under that premise, it’s easy to see why liberals and radical muslims are aligned. They both hate our system of government and seek to destroy it.

However, what the liberal pant-loads DON’T seem to get is that Mujibar, whether radical or somewhat calm in his approach to islam, really couldn’t care less if it was a catholic, a protestant, an agnostic, a jew a “reformed” muslim or a golden retriever hanging at the end of a rope with their head removed. They would no more take notice of that in the paper than I would of the death of Mrs Kravitz in the obits. However, when pointed out, they would say, “Hm….seems fine to me.”

People just don’t get it.

But at the same time, they are more likely to be moved by a “jihad” to end so-called “suffering” of “their people” all in the context that they think it will make their life somehow better.

I have spent my life filtering out the bullshit that the news from all the sources of the world has tried to feed me. Some of it is ok…much of it is not and almost ALL of it is slanted in this direction or that in order to sell it to the reader. There isn’t ONE hack reporter out there who doesn’t dream of the day when they can be called up on stage in a tuxedo to accept their Pulitzer in order to be legitimized under such names as Hemingway, Buck, Steinbeck, etc.

So I always have to consciously remind myself that the writer is trying to sell me something. Were it not for my cynical nature, I would be devouring every article in every paper as if it were the absolute truth.

The fact of the matter is, that I have to take what information I can get, weigh it against my own sensibilities and come up with an interpretation that I can work with. Thus, the MSM has left me cold years ago; All about selling advertising space, thus affording the most colorful “writers” of copy their jobs and BMW’s.

Herein, the conservative blogs, for which I am thankful. Though I don’t agree with all that is said here and certainly not by the likes of our most recent Hollander visateur, I do get more and better news. There is some commentary by Steve that I usually agree with and if not, I certainly understand it.

I am against Obama more than I’ve ever been against anyone or anything in my young life. He is bad for this nation. He is deserving of nothing less than ridicule and nothing more than contempt.

He holds our system to be bad by virtue of its imperfections and his fallacy lives and emanates from the basis of that imperfection.

Unfortunately, our society, keen on the 10-second sound bite and the half-hour sitcom resolution to all problems human, is ripe for the picking by a used car salesman of a president who acts like he has all the answers.

I shame the United States.

One, for putting up such a person as a legitimate candidate
Two, for never investigating him thoroughly prior to, during and after the election
Three, for allowing him to be president
Four, for never questioning his actions or words
Five, for allowing him to act, unencumbered by our political process
Six, for any and all things he’s done thus far that violate federal law

Only in places like this can we have a voice. And for how much longer?

Not only do we give them the tools, we train them to set up better attacks against us!

Left hand: We’re teaching terrorist computer skills

Right hand: The Moron is creating another czar (reporting to him personally of course)….a Ciber Security Czar

See how it works?

Taken from the battlefield and imprisoned ……… to becoming a cyber terrorist.
TRULY AMAZING!! I’m effing pissed now……………………………………