Hillary: Obama Not Muslim, As Far As I Know
From CBS News, via Breitbart and Redlasso:
“No. No, there is nothing to base that on. As far as I know.”
Good clean fun.
Maybe it would be a shame to see it all end tomorrow after all.
Related Articles:
- Hillary Crows: "I'm Just Getting Warmed Up"
- Hillary To Release Taxes After It's Too Late
- Is The New York Post's Graphic 'Suggestive'?
- Hillary's Staffers Say "Don't Fight On In Vain"
- Hillary Camp: Obama Plays 'Gay Bigot Card'
- Hillary Begs For Money For Her Last Big Push
- Hillary's Latest Ad Uses Nuke Scare Tactics
13 Responses to “Hillary: Obama Not Muslim, As Far As I Know”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.



March 4th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Listen to this video clip. First, if this is a quest for impartial truth, then the wrong parties are being queried. She takes Obama on “the basis of what he’s said”? Heaven help us! He’s contradicted and reversed himself so frequently as to impugn his own veracity. If she believes his drivel, then she’s too stupid to be president.
Second, she purports to have sympathy for those who are the victims of a smear campaign. How can she portray herself a victim of persecution and profess what amounts to a self-loathing of those tactics at the same time? The Clinton’s are (past ?) masters at planting the seeds of doubt. A better tack to take would be to sit on the sidelines and let Obama cut his own throat. His veneer is wearing pretty thin, too. Even the MSM is beginning to take a harder look.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
Let’s let them fight it out…the more Dhimmirat blood is spilled, the better.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
From the New York Times, via Obama’s own website (for now):
March 4th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as ”one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”…
Not only us folks in Alabama but I would say the majority of Americans no matter where they live.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
SG;….”Our biggest mistake since World War II has been a lack of sensitivity to other people’s nationalism, from Vietnam to Iraq. Perhaps as a result of his background, Mr. Obama has been unusually sensitive to such issues and to the need to project respect rather than arrogance…….”B. Obama
This from somebody who was a mere 12 years old (or so) at the end of the Viet Nam war. From someone raised during their early formative years in Hawaii, amid some of the most liberal of liberal populations. Whose entire knowledge of the history of those years comes from books written by left-wing 1960’s liberal ideologues, many of them anarchists themselves. From someone living part of their life in Indonesia, but subsequently sheltered from the reality of such places at the cost of American lives and treasure. I think it time this arrogant, pampered, left-wing, lying, son-of-a-bitch project a little respect on the people who made his meteoric rise to political prominence a reality. My fervent hope is that he get his ass handed to him so he can go off licking his wounds and comiserate with others of his ilk whining about the injustice of it all. You want change, Obama? Find yourself another country with the freedoms and opportunities afforded you by this one–then set about trying to change that one. I like this one the way it is, so bugger off! You won’t find another like the USA–or even come close–but even if you come somewhat close you’ll note it isn’ governed by a 7th century culture under Sharia law.
So go ahead, America. Vote for this dumbshit! The only reason every other nation on earth can exist as they do is because WE exist as WE do. Just remember, there’s nowhere else to hide once this country is gone.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Not only that, JMG, but the dimmest child knows that the Muslim extremists we face don’t give a pig’s patootie about “nationalism.” They want a global caliphate.
Mr. Obama is pig ignorant about the world.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:07 pm
“Just remember, there’s nowhere else to hide once this country is gone.” Probably the truest words ever written. Europe is gone, they are just arguing over when to hold the funeral. If the American left have their way it will be a joint funeral.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:43 pm
SG;…”Muslim extremists we face don’t give a pig’s patootie about “nationalism.” ….
A point overlooked (conveniently?) by most of Obama’s adherents. Every speech he has made is replete with code words. Never in my entire life of political observation have I heard a pol so capable of speaking at length, yet not express anything substantive. It’s like trying to nail jell-o to the wall–meaningless platitudes and mind-numbing drivel–the equivalent of valium. I’d rather be waterboarded as be forced to listen to his pap! Still he issues his vacuous crap with his sonorous delivery, as his audiences sit, mesmerized. This fool will give away the store. His positions make Carter look like a genius–a feat I didn’t think possible.
pagar; Yes, a funeral. Sans pallbearers. Hence the carcass will be left to rot before the startled, impotent mourners.
March 5th, 2008 at 8:30 am
Alright! The demoncraps now have a PIAPS and a PIAW (Pig Ignorant About the World) or a PP (Pig’s Patootie) running for POTUS.
Why do pigs just end up in the demo party? Is it the mud they lay down in?
Time to change from the donkey to the pig to represent their party. Actually, the pig would probably be a lot more appropriate for the demoncraptic symbol. They like to lay around in mud, sling it, and really don’t care how it makes them look. Donkeys, on the other hand, actually do some constructive work.
Wonder how these references to pigs makes Mr. Osama Obamamama feel about his “beautiful call for prayer” religion?
Gives me a craving for BBQd Ribs.
Good work, S&Lers!
March 5th, 2008 at 10:46 am
“Obama isn’t a Muslim…So far as I know.”
Yeah, & HIllary isn’t a radical leftist from the 60’s, self loathing anti American, Lesbian from Wellesley…So Far As I Know.
March 5th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
“Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as ”one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”…”
To each his own I suppose…
“Our biggest mistake since World War II has been a lack of sensitivity to other people’s nationalism, from Vietnam to Iraq.”
Iraqi nationalism? What the hell is that? Haven’t we been told over and over and over again that Iraq is merely the bastard child of British imperialism, cobbled together from former Ottoman possessions without regard for national, religious, or ethnic sensitivities? Maybe they mean the clash of Arab & Kurdish nationalism within Iraq itself. But if that’s what they meant, shouldn’t they then argue that the war in Iraq ought to be utilized to champion these nationalisms, rather than wailing frantically that we should get the hell out of there? That would far better fit their anti-Bush agenda, but I guess the NYT just isn’t that astute.
As for nationalism in Vietnam, they kind of have a point there, although I doubt they realize it. Ho Chi Minh was a nationalist long before he was a communist. He led a guerilla campaign against the Japanese during the War, and recieved not a small amount of American aid in his endeavours. He was a great hero to the people of Vietnam. Unfortunately, at war’s close, Ho’s growing ties to Chinese communists and the demands of maintaining the alliance with France in the face of Soviet power pushed Truman into supporting the return of Indochina to French authority. This had the understandable but no less regrettable effect of pushing Ho firmly into the communist camp, turning a potential ally into a sworn enemy, and given the support of many Vietnamese for Ho, the ineptitude with which France handled the situation in Indochina, and our own determination that communism must be actively contained, Truman more than any other President bound the U.S. to a long and bloody war in Southeast Asia.
But by then, whatever ties the U.S. and Ho Chi Minh had once had were long irrelevant. By the early 60s, Ho was no longer a nationalist, except for recruitment purposes. In all other matters he was just another communist. We were right to fight in Vietnam. We made mistakes, to be sure, we could have done things better, but we should have won there. In many ways, we did. At least until Congress wrenched defeat from the jaws of victory. But make no mistake, our failure to be “sensitive” to Vietnamese nationalism was not so much the failure of any “search and destroy” missions in the 60s, or some “hearts and minds” campaign in the 70s, but the betrayal of the hero of Vietnamese resistance to the Japanese in the 40s. Our greatest failure was abandoning the Vietnamese, and thus the Laotians and Cambodians, to their fate. With that fate in the hands of merciless, bloody communist regimes, that was a great failure indeed, a morale failure made even more egregious by those who pretend it to be a blessing.
But like I said, somehow I doubt the NYT realize the profundity of their point. Even if they did, I dare say they would not admit it.
March 5th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
Lurkin_no_mo …..”Why do pigs just end up in the demo party?….”
Get this. Hillary walks into a bar with a chicken under her arm. The bartender says, “Hey, you can’t bring that pig in here!”
Hillary says, “Are you blind? This is a chicken!”
Bartender says, “I was talkin’ to the chicken!”
March 5th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Barack Hussein Obama, “I’m not a Muslim, I just play one on African Television. With my vague speeches and limited history of government service I’m everything YOU want me to be!” ROFLMAO