Comments on: Hillary Gives ‘Gay Partners’ Full Benefits

By: Lurkin_no_mo

Lurkin_no_mo — Tue, 26 May 2009 06:07:31 +0000

Gee, is our military next on the chopping block? If anyone is interested, read a really good science fiction book called “The Forever Wars”. Good book which addresses a lot of what we see now.

By: heykev

heykev — Tue, 26 May 2009 02:16:56 +0000

And the one on your left is Frwannk.

By: heykev

heykev — Tue, 26 May 2009 02:15:23 +0000

“Previously, the State Department had withheld some benefits from the families of gay diplomats, citing the Defense of Marriage Law, which had restricted federal recognition of same-sex marriages.”

Isn’t Hillary breaking the law by offering these benefits? I had not heard that the “Defense of Marriage Law: was repealed by BHO.

If Hillary is breaking the law by offering these benefits, can’t something be done to stop her from breaking the law?

Pro – I have heard those same rumors about Ms. Clinton from a friend whose gay. She said that while running for Senate, one of her former partners “hooked up” with her every time she came to visit Rochester. Guess that explain why she does not care about Bill’s philandering ways.

By: proreason

proreason — Mon, 25 May 2009 23:28:52 +0000

Is the guy to the right little Barry?

By: vladtheimp

vladtheimp — Mon, 25 May 2009 23:11:54 +0000

Strange. I thought that the provision of benefits was within the purview of OPM, which is prescribed by law regarding the benefits it can provide. To my knowledge, there is no federal legislation extending the definition of family members for the purposes of benefits to non married couples, which would be a violation of the appropriations laws. I note that Princess Hillary (she would have been Queen but for Michelle) did not speak about extending medical and survivor benefits – I guess she thinks Barry Soetoro will take care of that in due course – but the use of appropriated funds for travel and training would seem to be a violation of a lesser degree. Anyone interested can go to the GAO website (www.gao.gov/) and request that they look into this unilateral display of administrative power – I will.

By: MinnesotaRush

MinnesotaRush — Mon, 25 May 2009 17:50:00 +0000

“.. by a State Department official who is a member of the Gays and Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies organization.”

These folks obviously have far too much time on their hands ..

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Mon, 25 May 2009 14:46:07 +0000

Talk about “sucking up” to the ever popular 1% vote. Frau Hilda has always carried the nut sack in the Clinton family. She is twice the man Bill could think of being. I am a little surprised that there is a “steering” committe made up by the LGB-STA for Hillary. I wonder how much special interest money the gubbamint provides these perverts?
If there were any questions before as to what sexual preference Hildabeast is …………. let this put your mind at ease.

By: canary

canary — Mon, 25 May 2009 07:59:51 +0000

Steve, good point. Hillary and Obama have further endangered our soldiers, especially the females.

By: jrmcdonald

jrmcdonald — Sun, 24 May 2009 19:26:56 +0000

So, thats why they call it ‘Foggy bottom!’ The government is broke, and she wants to spend money for what? Send this silly creature away.

By: Steve

Steve — Sun, 24 May 2009 17:12:23 +0000

Hillary’s roommate in college has gone on to quite the career in the LBGT world:

Ms. Acheson is a lawyer who was a liaison to the gay community for presidential candidate John Kerry. Before that she served in the Justice Department as the Assistant Attorney General for Policy Development under Janet Reno during the Clinton administration.

She is the founding Director of Public Policy and Government Affairs for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. Ms. Acheson also finds the time to head the Lesbian Gay Bi-Sexual Transgendered Americans For Hillary Steering Committee.

Hillary Spoke At Wellesley Due To Threats | Sweetness & Light
http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....ent-speech

By: proreason

proreason — Sun, 24 May 2009 17:03:39 +0000

My sister, who worked in Washington Civil Service for several years and had friends who knew the Hildabeast, swears she is a lesbian.

But what I find more interesting about this article is that there are openly gay diplomats in the State Department. Isn’t that a security risk?

And from what I understand to be the typical world-view of State Department employees, I wonder if queers might have essentially taken over the department and thereby subverted US interests and put all of our lives at greater risk than should be.

By: catie

catie — Sun, 24 May 2009 16:48:48 +0000

Gee whiz, this gets more ridiculous everyday.