SubscribeHillary To Follow Chavez On Oil Nationalization
From YouTube:
Ms. Clinton also promised to end the war in Iraq.
Of course she neglected to mention how she would do that.
Perhaps she will use the same special powers that will allow her to take away property from companies.
Related Articles:
- Time: US Can Keep Chavez From Going Castro
- Chavez Won't Pay Market Value For US Telcom
- Chavez Gives Himself Power To Rule By Decree
- Chavez Vows To Continue After His Term Ends
- Hugo Chavez Is "Re-Elected" Dictator For Life
- Chavez Steals Oil Fields To Fund Anti-US Efforts
- Chavez Threatens To Stop Oil Shipments To US
15 Responses to “Hillary To Follow Chavez On Oil Nationalization”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.
February 2nd, 2007 at 7:57 pm
It aint your or the democrats money you stuipd socialist cow.
Just try it and you will have a civil war right here in the USA.
February 2nd, 2007 at 8:04 pm
1st….there is no limit to how far she will go, how outlandish in her statements she will speak, how mean she will become and how evil she will appear in her quest for the ultimate power. And no one, but no one, will be exempt from her wrath, be it business, the military, republicans or fellow dhimmis, especially her fellow dhimmis. She will eat her young, throw the baby out with the bathwater and crush any and all opposition with any means, legal or otherwise, she may find at her disposal. Afterall this isn’t just Hillary running, it actually shill-billary. After becoming the first “black” president, billary wants to be the first 3rd full term president. God help us all if this twosome is successful.
February 2nd, 2007 at 8:28 pm
Hillary Clinton is a socialist; that’s all. Keep that in mind when the mainstream media incorrectly refer to her as a centrist Democratic candidate for President.
February 2nd, 2007 at 8:35 pm
Just like in “Atlas Shrugged”.
Peoples states, the common good, confiscating property, political pull, elite academics knowing what’s best for people, its all too scary to contemplate.
Who is John Galt?
February 2nd, 2007 at 9:58 pm
If anyone doubts Hillary’s intentions when she becomes president….this should begin to wake you up. Socialism disguised as democracy…..and those of us who work hard for a living, will have to work harder to support the Hillary voter base. She is their hero….they know she will create a socialist state that cares for anyone who needs government help….and those who disagree, namely people with careers, jobs, and income…will be taxed into oblivion to keep her promises. We are in for a very dismal time, until she is ousted from office when the country yet again wakes up to the perils of liberal socialism, and leftist apologetic opinion seekers.
We need a leader. She isnt a leader. She is a shrew.
February 3rd, 2007 at 8:45 am
Sounds like nationalizing the oil industry to me.
She wants to nationalize as many aspects of the economy as possible because she honestly believes that government is the better custodian of industry and spending than private entities are.
She said she wants to “take” those profits. That’s an important point. She did not say “tax” those profits.
“We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” - the socialist during her 2004 campaign.
Rather telling, don’t you think?
February 3rd, 2007 at 9:50 am
The smartest woman in the world neglected to say how much the big oil companies paid in taxes the same year they made their biggest profits. What she also didn’t say was whether or not the oil companies’ profit MARGINS increased. They did not, of course. Big oil’s profit margins are anywhere from 11 to 13 percent, which is a helluva lot less than a lot of businesses. And of course, all those profits are stuffed into upper management’s mattresses. They don’t ever invest that money into exploration, salary increases, research, etc. If this nazi gets elected, I’m gettin’ a rubber raft and paddling to New Zealand.
February 3rd, 2007 at 10:06 am
This article from the Communist Party of America says that the Communist Party of America can count on over 30 members of Congress (many of them now committee chairpersons) to move their agenda forward. It seems to me, that as persistent as the Communists have been in taking over various countries, that Americans need to pay more attention to the relationship between the Democrats and the Communists in America.
http://www.cpusa.org/article/a.....769/1/135/
I don’t believe for a minute that America’s Communist Party is going away, they are just getting better at moving their agenda in to the
positions the Democrats claim as theirs. I urge you to read the article and see what is currently being put forward in Congress as supposedly Democrat ideas, ideas that the Communist claim they can use to defeat America.
February 3rd, 2007 at 10:56 am
You know yesterday, after listening to her ‘I want your money’ crappola quote (re taking the oil companies profits to like, maybe create a (slush) fund that might sometime in the far future like make some inane form of alternative power that just might like maybe work . . .
realized that she is a typical liberal and dangerous.
Change it to her infamous (which lead me to never, ever consider her for any political office) “We’re not coming to you, many of whom are well enough off that actually the tax cuts may have helped you, and say ‘we’re going to give you more.’ We’re saying, ‘you know what, for America to get back on track and be fiscally responsible, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”(07/03/04)
Scares the heck out of me - this woman wants universalhealthcareforallillegalsfirst and (fortunately failed), then went after tax cuts ‘for the greater good’ crap and now wants to take profits from businesses she does not agree with ‘for a fund’ .
What do you bet if this creature becomes President she will overturn the Presidential term limits and try to be el Presidente` for life?
Yes, you laugh - but look at the crappola she is putting forth, got elected to the Senate, re-elected and now is in the ring for President. STOP HER NOW.
February 3rd, 2007 at 10:58 am
Directive 10-289 will be foisted upon us by someone such as this. And judging by the tenor of her statement, I’d say sooner rather than later.
And making her path easy are the “news” agencies who refuse to offer information putting these profits in perspective. What’s their ROE? What’s the governments’ take from the profits already? Good grief.
February 3rd, 2007 at 12:06 pm
Oil companies are making a profit of about 10 cents a gallon.
The federal government makes 18.4 cents per gallon, Some states as much as 33 cents a gallon.
Hillery and her ilk want to do what they have done to tobacco.
Only this time they will go after hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars.
If Democrats have their way our economy will be devastated, Gas will be 5 dollars a gallon,
And every product will go up accordingly.
They will not be happy until America is thrown into civil war again.
February 3rd, 2007 at 12:58 pm
Phil–She may be socialist on the outside, but inside Hil is as fascist as they come.
February 3rd, 2007 at 5:00 pm
Look, I read “Atlas Shrugged” and I hated it. By the time I found out who friggin’ John Galt was, I wanted Dagny to stab him to death with a piece of railroad track. I don’t really understand why people think it’s such a wonderful book, either as a piece of writing or as a political manifesto.
Bu Hillary’s still a snag, who’s in it for one thing and one thing only- Hillary Clinton. Everything about her rings false, even her socialism and her elect-me-and-I’ll-ensure-that-space-unicorns-will-heal-the-wounds-of-American-oppression
schtick. It’s all a ploy for power. I’ve never seen a woman, politician or not, who is more power-hungry.
Except maybe Oprah.
February 4th, 2007 at 8:29 am
We need to figure out how to confiscate her profits (cattle futures, Wal-Mart, etc.) and send them to Club For Growth.
February 11th, 2007 at 11:04 pm
I liked Atlas Shrugged even though I didn’t think much of Rand’s virulent anti-Christianity. However, it painted a very vivid picture of America under socialist control, and a lot of conservatives saw that picture as highly accurate. Too bad she’s an absolute nutcase–I’ll hear enough anti-Christian ranting when I go back to college, without having to seek it out myself.
Kucharsk–don’t forget her selling short on pharmaceutical stocks just before starting her push to socialize medicine. That this woman can be elected to ANY office, anywhere, is a reason to be deeply disappointed in this country.