« | »

Insider: Hillary Not Author Of “Hillarycare”

What timing!

We are now being authoritatively informed that Hillary was not in charge of the universal health care proposal lambasted as “Hillarycare” 14 years ago. 

From the leftwing pro-Hillary American Prospect:

Then first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, holding a copy of the Clinton health-care plan, kicks off a three-state sales campaign during a visit to the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore on Oct. 28, 1993.

The Hillarycare Mythology

Did Hillary doom health reform in 1993? It’s time to get the facts straight about the Clinton plan and why compromise failed. Here’s the real story, from the Prospect co-editor who was a White House senior health policy advisor at the time.

Paul Starr | September 14, 2007

Five days after his inauguration in 1993, Bill Clinton named his wife to chair a newly established President’s Task Force on National Health Care Reform. From that moment, the public had the impression that Hillary Clinton and the task force under her direction were responsible for coming up with the administration’s reform plan. And when that plan went down to defeat, many people assigned her a large share of the blame.

Now that Hillary Clinton is a candidate for president, the health-reform debacle is again receiving attention, this time as a basis for judging what kind of a president she might be in her own right. The trouble with such judgments, however, is that they are usually rooted in a series of misunderstandings about the Clinton health plan, Hillary’s role in the reform effort, and the reasons for its failure. The mythology of “Hillarycare,” as the Republicans like to call it, is only partly the result of right-wing misrepresentations of the plan as a “government takeover” and malicious personal attacks on Hillary. The press never got the story right in the first place, and recent biographies and articles about Sen. Clinton have added to the misconceptions.

By the time Hillary became involved in health-care reform in late January 1993, Bill Clinton’s thinking about the problem was already well advanced. The previous September during his campaign, he had settled on the basic model for reform — a plan for universal coverage based on consumer choice among competing private health plans, operating under a cap on total spending (an approach known, in the shorthand of health policy, as “managed competition within a budget”). Though the media scarcely registered it at the time, Clinton had described this approach in a speech and referred to it in the presidential debates.

Moreover, he saw health-care reform through the prism of economic policy, believed that reducing the long-term growth in health costs was a national imperative, and insisted that even while making coverage universal, health-care reform had to bring down future costs below current projections for both the government and the private economy. Among Clinton’s close advisors, Ira Magaziner championed the view that these aims were achievable. When he became the director of the health-reform effort and Hillary the chair, their job was not to choose a policy, but to develop the one that the president had already adopted

Bill Clinton actually never gave up control of the policy-making process, and the work fell to a small team of advisors and analysts that Magaziner directed. Beginning in March and continuing in a stop-and-go fashion until September, the decision meetings about the plan took place outside the formal structure of the task force, usually in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, and the president ran the meetings himself.

My knowledge of this process is first-hand…

The first lady was an active force in these discussions, but there was never any question that the president was in charge. We took our guidance from him. That, of course, was how it should have been (who else but the president ought to make such decisions?), except that many reporters and the public thought that Bill Clinton had handed over the policy to Hillary and that she would report back to him, which was not the case

Not only did the fiction of Hillary’s personal responsibility for the health plan fail to protect the president at the time, it has also now come back to haunt her in her own quest for the presidency.

According to recurrent accounts — most recently in Carl Bernstein’s shoddily researched biography A Woman in Charge — it was supposedly Hillary’s secretiveness and rigidity that led to fatal decisions about the White House health plan and political strategy. Careful reporting after the failure of the health plan showed these charges were false, but Bernstein and other writers continue to recycle them…

So now Hillary is distancing herself from the only thing she has ever done?

Or rather, the only thing she has ever tried to do.

This article was posted by Steve on Monday, September 17th, 2007. Comments are currently closed.

7 Responses to “Insider: Hillary Not Author Of “Hillarycare””

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.

« Front Page | To Top
« | »