<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History: Barack Obama, Barrack Emperor?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:10:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124237</link>
		<dc:creator>pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124237</guid>
		<description>How about caveat emperor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about caveat emperor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor_Repulso</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124170</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor_Repulso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124170</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama&#039;s glassy-eyed enthusiasts see nothing laughable about Barack &amp; Michelle&#039;s pathetically slavish efforts to repackage themselves as carbon copies of the dead Kennedys, John &amp; Jackie.  Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but it only works to the benefit of those being imitated - the imitators come off as desperate wannabees.  Though the Obamas may yearn to hold court in some latter-day Camelot, they lack the authenticity of the high-born people they are imitating.  Trying to copy the &#039;Kennedy look&#039; from faded photographs just doesn&#039;t work for the Obamas.  The whole imitation thing lacks originality; Michelle just looks silly sporting Jackie&#039;s signature pearls, simple A-line dresses and a chemically-manufactured, welded-in-place, knock off of Jackie O&#039;s flip hairstyle.
&quot;Mikki Taylor, beauty editor for &lt;i&gt;Essence&lt;/i&gt; magazine noted that there was nothing accidental about Michelle Obama&#039;s fashion offensive: &#039;And when we flash back to the &#039;60&#039;s, those are the terms that come to mind when we think about Jacqueline Kennedy.&#039;  The fashion rags have dubbed her Michelle O; the shock jocks who thrive on puncturing pomposity have tarred her as Blackie O.
&quot;The photographic evidence is overwhelming.  The sleeveless blue dress and chunky pearls that Michelle sported for her &lt;i&gt;Newsweek&lt;/i&gt; cover shot was virtually identical to an ensemble worn by Jackie forty years ago.  Michelle was photographed in a light yellow suit that is strikingly similar to one worn by Jackie when she was campaigning with JFK.  Poor Michelle has done everything but plant a pill box hat on top of her processed doo.  And in case you still missed the point of the Obamas&#039; desperate posturing, the Obama campaign has issued campaign buttons featuring side-by-side photos of John Kennedy and Barack.  Comically, Michelle Obama undermined the whole Kennedy-imitation project by tastelessly blurting out that her husband starts the day with foul breath and rank body odor.&quot;

www.weirdrepublic.com/episode89.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama&#8217;s glassy-eyed enthusiasts see nothing laughable about Barack &amp; Michelle&#8217;s pathetically slavish efforts to repackage themselves as carbon copies of the dead Kennedys, John &amp; Jackie.  Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but it only works to the benefit of those being imitated &#8211; the imitators come off as desperate wannabees.  Though the Obamas may yearn to hold court in some latter-day Camelot, they lack the authenticity of the high-born people they are imitating.  Trying to copy the &#8216;Kennedy look&#8217; from faded photographs just doesn&#8217;t work for the Obamas.  The whole imitation thing lacks originality; Michelle just looks silly sporting Jackie&#8217;s signature pearls, simple A-line dresses and a chemically-manufactured, welded-in-place, knock off of Jackie O&#8217;s flip hairstyle.<br />
&#8220;Mikki Taylor, beauty editor for <i>Essence</i> magazine noted that there was nothing accidental about Michelle Obama&#8217;s fashion offensive: &#8216;And when we flash back to the &#8217;60&#8217;s, those are the terms that come to mind when we think about Jacqueline Kennedy.&#8217;  The fashion rags have dubbed her Michelle O; the shock jocks who thrive on puncturing pomposity have tarred her as Blackie O.<br />
&#8220;The photographic evidence is overwhelming.  The sleeveless blue dress and chunky pearls that Michelle sported for her <i>Newsweek</i> cover shot was virtually identical to an ensemble worn by Jackie forty years ago.  Michelle was photographed in a light yellow suit that is strikingly similar to one worn by Jackie when she was campaigning with JFK.  Poor Michelle has done everything but plant a pill box hat on top of her processed doo.  And in case you still missed the point of the Obamas&#8217; desperate posturing, the Obama campaign has issued campaign buttons featuring side-by-side photos of John Kennedy and Barack.  Comically, Michelle Obama undermined the whole Kennedy-imitation project by tastelessly blurting out that her husband starts the day with foul breath and rank body odor.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weirdrepublic.com/episode89.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.weirdrepublic.com/episode89.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuthingbettertodo</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124138</link>
		<dc:creator>nuthingbettertodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124138</guid>
		<description>“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.  For the traitor appears not traitor, he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.”  - Cicero, 42 B.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.  For the traitor appears not traitor, he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.”  &#8211; Cicero, 42 B.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124134</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/history-barack-obama-vs-barracks-emperor#comment-124134</guid>
		<description>How appropriate with the onslaught of the Emperors&#039; $1.00 gold coin w/ JFK like 50 cent gold piece. Commerating the King of Kings&#039; one week anniversary on the Raping of a Democracy.
&quot;ALL HAIL THE FLEECING OF THE REPUBLIC!!&quot; (the sheepeople BAA wildly)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How appropriate with the onslaught of the Emperors&#8217; $1.00 gold coin w/ JFK like 50 cent gold piece. Commerating the King of Kings&#8217; one week anniversary on the Raping of a Democracy.<br />
&#8220;ALL HAIL THE FLEECING OF THE REPUBLIC!!&#8221; (the sheepeople BAA wildly)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
