<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Panel Approves $3.5 Trillion Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140111</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140111</guid>
		<description>HEY TALK RADIO !!!   READ CJOKRY&#039;s COMMENT.

&quot;How come only failed banking corporations that contributed heavily to Obama’s campaign get checks to stimulate the economy now?&quot;

cjokry hit a home run with this one.

The Republicans should pick this up and form a flying wedge with it into the end zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEY TALK RADIO !!!   READ CJOKRY&#8217;s COMMENT.</p>
<p>&#8220;How come only failed banking corporations that contributed heavily to Obama’s campaign get checks to stimulate the economy now?&#8221;</p>
<p>cjokry hit a home run with this one.</p>
<p>The Republicans should pick this up and form a flying wedge with it into the end zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjokry</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140110</link>
		<dc:creator>cjokry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140110</guid>
		<description>When Bush was in office, Doonsberry&#039;s author was asking, via his comic, where the myth of Republicans being more fiscally responsible came from.  It seemed almost a valid point at the time.  But after less than a hundred days in office and uncountable trillions borrowed and rolled off the presses to be set on fire and thrown into a few different bottomless pits, I think I have found yet another obvious answer to another liberal&#039;s pointless question.

I liked Bush&#039;s fiscal irresponsibility way better:  start an expensive war, but cut taxes AND mail everybody an extra check for a few hundred bucks and tell them to stimulate the economy with it.  How come only failed banking corporations that contributed heavily to Obama&#039;s campaign get checks to stimulate the economy now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Bush was in office, Doonsberry&#8217;s author was asking, via his comic, where the myth of Republicans being more fiscally responsible came from.  It seemed almost a valid point at the time.  But after less than a hundred days in office and uncountable trillions borrowed and rolled off the presses to be set on fire and thrown into a few different bottomless pits, I think I have found yet another obvious answer to another liberal&#8217;s pointless question.</p>
<p>I liked Bush&#8217;s fiscal irresponsibility way better:  start an expensive war, but cut taxes AND mail everybody an extra check for a few hundred bucks and tell them to stimulate the economy with it.  How come only failed banking corporations that contributed heavily to Obama&#8217;s campaign get checks to stimulate the economy now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140094</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140094</guid>
		<description>Well, oOlbama still refusing states requests for National Guard on the borders.
He wants Republicans to die off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, oOlbama still refusing states requests for National Guard on the borders.<br />
He wants Republicans to die off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillK</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140083</link>
		<dc:creator>BillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140083</guid>
		<description>Did you notice that the quote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;To a bunch of the critics out there, I’ve already said, ‘Show me your budget!’&lt;/blockquote&gt;

seems to be boilerplate now?

The &quot;critics&quot; keep &lt;b&gt;presenting&lt;/b&gt; their budgets time and again, and they keep getting shot down on &lt;b&gt;pure party-line votes&lt;/b&gt;.

Of course the press repeats the lies that Republicans are not presenting alternatives &lt;i&gt;ad nauseum&lt;/i&gt; and it looks like the GOP is just a bunch of negative whiners.

Excellent work, Mr. President.

I hate what he&#039;s doing, but you have to admire how well the Democrats are doing it and the fact that there&#039;s not a damn thing we can do to stop it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice that the quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>To a bunch of the critics out there, I’ve already said, ‘Show me your budget!’</p></blockquote>
<p>seems to be boilerplate now?</p>
<p>The &#8220;critics&#8221; keep <b>presenting</b> their budgets time and again, and they keep getting shot down on <b>pure party-line votes</b>.</p>
<p>Of course the press repeats the lies that Republicans are not presenting alternatives <i>ad nauseum</i> and it looks like the GOP is just a bunch of negative whiners.</p>
<p>Excellent work, Mr. President.</p>
<p>I hate what he&#8217;s doing, but you have to admire how well the Democrats are doing it and the fact that there&#8217;s not a damn thing we can do to stop it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140072</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140072</guid>
		<description>That BIG WHOOSH you heard was are nation being flushed down the shiiter!!
65 days.....a new worlds record!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That BIG WHOOSH you heard was are nation being flushed down the shiiter!!<br />
65 days&#8230;..a new worlds record!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140064</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140064</guid>
		<description>Has The Moron mastered a new pose?   It&#039;s been a while since he upgraded his repetoire.

This one is an interesting mix of benevolent giving with a contemptuous sneer.  Very very liberal, almost Wallstreetian.

I think this one should be called the Backhanded Blessing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has The Moron mastered a new pose?   It&#8217;s been a while since he upgraded his repetoire.</p>
<p>This one is an interesting mix of benevolent giving with a contemptuous sneer.  Very very liberal, almost Wallstreetian.</p>
<p>I think this one should be called the Backhanded Blessing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140054</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140054</guid>
		<description>unsustainable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unsustainable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdsand</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140048</link>
		<dc:creator>pdsand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140048</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Mr. Boehner et al introduce an alternative stimulus plan?  Didn&#039;t Rush do the same?  All this is fine for somebody to come out for news purposes and make a &quot;budget&quot; although it would be a time extensive waste of effort.  Because as well all know, the rules in the House for amendments are now draconian, and if a Representative were to go to all the trouble to introduce an amendment to the bill to basically replace the President&#039;s budget with the &quot;republican alternative&quot; it would just die on party line vote.  If I were Obama I would ask for an alternative budget all day long, because a budget is the one exact piece of legislation that an &quot;alternative&quot; is truly a pointless exercise.  How many months would it take to write, I too would encourage the Republicans to take their eyes off the prize for that long and spin their wheels for no legislative reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Mr. Boehner et al introduce an alternative stimulus plan?  Didn&#8217;t Rush do the same?  All this is fine for somebody to come out for news purposes and make a &#8220;budget&#8221; although it would be a time extensive waste of effort.  Because as well all know, the rules in the House for amendments are now draconian, and if a Representative were to go to all the trouble to introduce an amendment to the bill to basically replace the President&#8217;s budget with the &#8220;republican alternative&#8221; it would just die on party line vote.  If I were Obama I would ask for an alternative budget all day long, because a budget is the one exact piece of legislation that an &#8220;alternative&#8221; is truly a pointless exercise.  How many months would it take to write, I too would encourage the Republicans to take their eyes off the prize for that long and spin their wheels for no legislative reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BannedbytheTaliban</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140045</link>
		<dc:creator>BannedbytheTaliban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140045</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;‘Show me your budget!’ &lt;/b&gt;

It is time the GOP started doing just that.  Introduce a counter piece of legislation to every Democrat boondoggle they bring to the floor.  Stop just voting no and start giving Congress a choice.  I doubt any of it will pass, but at least will show flaws in the DNC plans, if merely by juxtaposition. 

&lt;b&gt;tax hikes on the rich and some small businesses&lt;/b&gt;

That is liberalspeak for successful businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>‘Show me your budget!’ </b></p>
<p>It is time the GOP started doing just that.  Introduce a counter piece of legislation to every Democrat boondoggle they bring to the floor.  Stop just voting no and start giving Congress a choice.  I doubt any of it will pass, but at least will show flaws in the DNC plans, if merely by juxtaposition. </p>
<p><b>tax hikes on the rich and some small businesses</b></p>
<p>That is liberalspeak for successful businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140043</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140043</guid>
		<description>&#039;Mr. President, may I ask you a question?  If not, I&#039;ll just write what I&#039;m told.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Mr. President, may I ask you a question?  If not, I&#8217;ll just write what I&#8217;m told.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140041</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140041</guid>
		<description>This &quot;news&quot; report appears to have been written by The Moron himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;news&#8221; report appears to have been written by The Moron himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdsand</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140038</link>
		<dc:creator>pdsand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140038</guid>
		<description>Oh, oh! Steve, didn&#039;t you break the news here that House rules make tax cuts impossible anyway?  Maybe that&#039;s the reason why the tax cut got taken out isn&#039;t newsworthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, oh! Steve, didn&#8217;t you break the news here that House rules make tax cuts impossible anyway?  Maybe that&#8217;s the reason why the tax cut got taken out isn&#8217;t newsworthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdsand</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140036</link>
		<dc:creator>pdsand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140036</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the pretty much xeroxed it and voted on it, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the pretty much xeroxed it and voted on it, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right of the People</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140034</link>
		<dc:creator>Right of the People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-approves-345-trillion-budget#comment-140034</guid>
		<description>Got to get the 2012 campaign moving, only  43 months left until the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to get the 2012 campaign moving, only  43 months left until the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

