<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Passes $410B In New Spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:42:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136335</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136335</guid>
		<description>VDH says there is no way current economy merits redefinition of government.

&quot;So are we in a depression that justifies a vast redefinition of government and a massive takeover of the private sector? Not quite. What we are a witnessing instead is a sharp downturn from the most affluent era in the history of civilization. For the last two decades, we borrowed and spent as if there were no tomorrow. Now we are living in that tomorrow of cutting back and making do.

In relative terms, it is no longer 2005, but that does not mean it is 1932 either&quot;

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDJiMGY4YzQ0OGYwMmU5NzU3MTI4NjE2Zjc0ZmVhMWU=


But the radical left is siezing the moment.   These are perilous times.    Some of this crap will be impossible to unwind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VDH says there is no way current economy merits redefinition of government.</p>
<p>&#8220;So are we in a depression that justifies a vast redefinition of government and a massive takeover of the private sector? Not quite. What we are a witnessing instead is a sharp downturn from the most affluent era in the history of civilization. For the last two decades, we borrowed and spent as if there were no tomorrow. Now we are living in that tomorrow of cutting back and making do.</p>
<p>In relative terms, it is no longer 2005, but that does not mean it is 1932 either&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDJiMGY4YzQ0OGYwMmU5NzU3MTI4NjE2Zjc0ZmVhMWU=" rel="nofollow">http://article.nationalreview......c0ZmVhMWU=</a></p>
<p>But the radical left is siezing the moment.   These are perilous times.    Some of this crap will be impossible to unwind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellarcan</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136285</link>
		<dc:creator>yellarcan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136285</guid>
		<description>pinandpuller,
That&#039;s okay if he&#039;s by himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pinandpuller,<br />
That&#8217;s okay if he&#8217;s by himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellarcan</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136283</link>
		<dc:creator>yellarcan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136283</guid>
		<description>It looks like she farted again. She needs to &quot;change&quot; her diet. Get it? Change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like she farted again. She needs to &#8220;change&#8221; her diet. Get it? Change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronson</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136109</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136109</guid>
		<description>Aparently its only defense spending that bothers them, hence Obama plans to cut defense spending in the future. Clinton&#039;s &quot;surplus&quot; can be attributed, along with bizzare accounting, on defense spending, and shortly after his disgraceful departure we got 9-11. So maybe he should of spent just a little more on things like intelligence or defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aparently its only defense spending that bothers them, hence Obama plans to cut defense spending in the future. Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;surplus&#8221; can be attributed, along with bizzare accounting, on defense spending, and shortly after his disgraceful departure we got 9-11. So maybe he should of spent just a little more on things like intelligence or defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136107</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136107</guid>
		<description>Nope, no one. Unfortunately, we are in the position again to take a backseat while the Democrats drive. 

Once the public gets bored and fed-up with their broken promises, and things are exactly the same or worse than the were before, the Republicans will have an advantage. 

Right now, Republicans screwed things up so bad when they had the House, Senate, White House, that the product name is not strong. Kick out or vote out the old, and make way for new blood. It&#039;s best to let the crap Republican get voted out of office (if he won&#039;t step aside) then vote in a new Republican a few years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, no one. Unfortunately, we are in the position again to take a backseat while the Democrats drive. </p>
<p>Once the public gets bored and fed-up with their broken promises, and things are exactly the same or worse than the were before, the Republicans will have an advantage. </p>
<p>Right now, Republicans screwed things up so bad when they had the House, Senate, White House, that the product name is not strong. Kick out or vote out the old, and make way for new blood. It&#8217;s best to let the crap Republican get voted out of office (if he won&#8217;t step aside) then vote in a new Republican a few years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yonason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136105</link>
		<dc:creator>yonason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136105</guid>
		<description>James McGovern, D-Mass. is just another democrat liar.  They are the ones who got us into this mess, and now they are digging in deeper, and the @#$% idiots who voted for them can&#039;t see it.  Of course the @#$% odious Rinos who aided and abetted them are to blame, as well.  And where are the real Conservatives who can speak out and make people understand?  Anyone?  HELLO!

//RANT=OFF// (for the moment)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James McGovern, D-Mass. is just another democrat liar.  They are the ones who got us into this mess, and now they are digging in deeper, and the @#$% idiots who voted for them can&#8217;t see it.  Of course the @#$% odious Rinos who aided and abetted them are to blame, as well.  And where are the real Conservatives who can speak out and make people understand?  Anyone?  HELLO!</p>
<p>//RANT=OFF// (for the moment)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12 Gauge Rage</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136099</link>
		<dc:creator>12 Gauge Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136099</guid>
		<description>More money needed by the dem&#039;s in power. More screwing over of the average American trying to survive or get ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More money needed by the dem&#8217;s in power. More screwing over of the average American trying to survive or get ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136094</link>
		<dc:creator>pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136094</guid>
		<description>The main problem is Ted Kennedy&#039;s driving the towtruck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem is Ted Kennedy&#8217;s driving the towtruck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136087</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136087</guid>
		<description>Size doesn&#039;t matter, it&#039;s how you use it. ---All Men Everywhere. 


It doesn&#039;t help if you show up with a big tow truck, and then drive it into the ditch, then you need another one later to pull both of you out. Well.....here. This is the democrats&#039; plan set to video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u82CPjXV1Vw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Size doesn&#8217;t matter, it&#8217;s how you use it. &#8212;All Men Everywhere. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t help if you show up with a big tow truck, and then drive it into the ditch, then you need another one later to pull both of you out. Well&#8230;..here. This is the democrats&#8217; plan set to video:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u82CPjXV1Vw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u82CPjXV1Vw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136082</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136082</guid>
		<description>See what happens when you don&#039;t eat your vegatables?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See what happens when you don&#8217;t eat your vegatables?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136075</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136075</guid>
		<description>Ah, hah, bipartisanship is when we reach 50% of GDP.

Can Obama do it by 2012?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, hah, bipartisanship is when we reach 50% of GDP.</p>
<p>Can Obama do it by 2012?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136066</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136066</guid>
		<description>Look at the ibd link from my post a few above this one, pd.

The Moron&#039;s spending is already 50% more than Bush&#039;s.....34 days into office.

And Bush&#039;s spending was not as bad as we all thought.....by god I wish the man would have defendeed himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the ibd link from my post a few above this one, pd.</p>
<p>The Moron&#8217;s spending is already 50% more than Bush&#8217;s&#8230;..34 days into office.</p>
<p>And Bush&#8217;s spending was not as bad as we all thought&#8230;..by god I wish the man would have defendeed himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdsand</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136065</link>
		<dc:creator>pdsand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136065</guid>
		<description>Republicans had two wars, and more importantly, they continued to indulge Democrat demands for funding.  So they ran what now looks like modest deficits.  I fail to understand why that is carte blanc for the Democrats to spend literally trillions, amassing trillion dollar deficits, and say, &#039;you did the same thing&#039;.  My little liberal buddies all say the same thing, &#039;the republicans ran deficits, so they can&#039;t complain&#039;.
I heard it said so much last night, &quot;That is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. That&#039;s an American issue.&quot;  Well you would think these turds would realize that borrowing trillions, not over the course of 8 years, but over the course of the last several weeks, with more to come I&#039;m sure, is an American issue.  It&#039;s not like they&#039;re gonna &quot;get us back&quot; by literally ruining our country.  Or maybe that&#039;s the point.

&quot;Given these realities, everyone in this chamber – Democrats and Republicans – will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars.  And that includes me.&quot;

We see how long that lasted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans had two wars, and more importantly, they continued to indulge Democrat demands for funding.  So they ran what now looks like modest deficits.  I fail to understand why that is carte blanc for the Democrats to spend literally trillions, amassing trillion dollar deficits, and say, &#8216;you did the same thing&#8217;.  My little liberal buddies all say the same thing, &#8216;the republicans ran deficits, so they can&#8217;t complain&#8217;.<br />
I heard it said so much last night, &#8220;That is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. That&#8217;s an American issue.&#8221;  Well you would think these turds would realize that borrowing trillions, not over the course of 8 years, but over the course of the last several weeks, with more to come I&#8217;m sure, is an American issue.  It&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re gonna &#8220;get us back&#8221; by literally ruining our country.  Or maybe that&#8217;s the point.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given these realities, everyone in this chamber – Democrats and Republicans – will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars.  And that includes me.&#8221;</p>
<p>We see how long that lasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136064</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136064</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t as bad as you have been led to believe, nascar.

Bush&#039;s spending was right in-line with history.

See the graph in this link:  Bush&#039;s spending, like predecessors, was 20% of GDP.   The Moron is now up to 30%

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=320370677654157

Liberals have slurred Bush with spending figures that haven&#039;t been adjusted for inflation or GDP.

Even conservatives get tripped up by the &lt;b&gt; in-your-face-25-hours-a-day-lying-cheating-scheming-liberal-media.&lt;/b&gt;   I know I wasn&#039;t aware of this information until a few days ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t as bad as you have been led to believe, nascar.</p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s spending was right in-line with history.</p>
<p>See the graph in this link:  Bush&#8217;s spending, like predecessors, was 20% of GDP.   The Moron is now up to 30%</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=320370677654157" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibdeditorials.com/I.....0677654157</a></p>
<p>Liberals have slurred Bush with spending figures that haven&#8217;t been adjusted for inflation or GDP.</p>
<p>Even conservatives get tripped up by the <b> in-your-face-25-hours-a-day-lying-cheating-scheming-liberal-media.</b>   I know I wasn&#8217;t aware of this information until a few days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigOil</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136063</link>
		<dc:creator>BigOil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-passes-410b-in-new-spending#comment-136063</guid>
		<description>The freight train of socialism rolls on.  Here comes the next tsunami of spending:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Obama to propose tax hikes to pay for health reform&lt;/b&gt;

By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch

(MarketWatch) -- President Barack Obama will propose $634 billion in tax hikes on upper-income taxpayers and cuts to government health spending to pay for health-care reform over the next 10 years, an administration official said Wednesday. 
The tax increases and spending cuts are being outlined as part of Obama&#039;s first budget, which he will unveil on Thursday morning. 
&lt;b&gt;The spending cuts are aimed at curbing overall health-care spending while also raising money for the new president&#039;s plan to enact near-universal health care.&lt;/b&gt;
The cuts would affect managed-care companies, prescription drug manufacturers and hospitals, The Wall Street Journal reported. 
Obama&#039;s budget will aim to pump money into energy, education and health care even as it seeks to save cash by cutting programs and halve the roughly $1 trillion deficit by the end of his first term. 
Obama will deliver his spending priorities to Congress as the nation grapples with a punishing recession and persistent anxiety about the depressed state of financial markets.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Obama-eyes-tax-hikes-pay/story.aspx?guid=%7BAB1961AA%2DB6D5%2D4ABD%2DBDC1%2D41223A8250DC%7D&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL - His plan is to raise money for health care by cutting health care.  We will be very fortunate if we manage to survive this insanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The freight train of socialism rolls on.  Here comes the next tsunami of spending:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Obama to propose tax hikes to pay for health reform</b></p>
<p>By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch</p>
<p>(MarketWatch) &#8212; President Barack Obama will propose $634 billion in tax hikes on upper-income taxpayers and cuts to government health spending to pay for health-care reform over the next 10 years, an administration official said Wednesday.<br />
The tax increases and spending cuts are being outlined as part of Obama&#8217;s first budget, which he will unveil on Thursday morning.<br />
<b>The spending cuts are aimed at curbing overall health-care spending while also raising money for the new president&#8217;s plan to enact near-universal health care.</b><br />
The cuts would affect managed-care companies, prescription drug manufacturers and hospitals, The Wall Street Journal reported.<br />
Obama&#8217;s budget will aim to pump money into energy, education and health care even as it seeks to save cash by cutting programs and halve the roughly $1 trillion deficit by the end of his first term.<br />
Obama will deliver his spending priorities to Congress as the nation grapples with a punishing recession and persistent anxiety about the depressed state of financial markets.<br />
<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Obama-eyes-tax-hikes-pay/story.aspx?guid=%7BAB1961AA%2DB6D5%2D4ABD%2DBDC1%2D41223A8250DC%7D" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/new.....A8250DC%7D</a></p></blockquote>
<p>LOL &#8211; His plan is to raise money for health care by cutting health care.  We will be very fortunate if we manage to survive this insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
