Also, will Obama be cancelling his family trip to Indonesia, his favorite country in the world, that he with out logic reason blames America for their troubles.

And then Capital Hill leaked the NYC al-qaeda surveillance, which blew
federal law-enforcement’s investigation.

Beauty, you are spot on with the reason we don’t hear open protests about this from the MSM and the rest of the libtards. I can’t wait until some “progressive” (sic) city like San Francisco adopts Shariah law and they start stoning some of the happy people for their behavior. Do you think the MSM would say something then?

Except for an extreme view of what should be done with these animals, I seriously don’t have a clue how to combat them.

I know it seems kind of isolationist but as long as they keep their sixth century beliefs in the third world, I say let them have at it. On the other hand if they are in our country, that dog don’t hunt.

Rifqa says her blood has become halal under Islamic law because she converted to Christianity, and thus it is considered pure to kill her if she does not return to Islam. All four schools of Islamic law agree on killing apostates.

I’m not familiar with what MSM is doing with the case (I don’t watch it) but I hope the media does not jeopardize this girl’s safety by playing down her circumstances.

Of course it is. Women are less than dogs under Islamic law. Under Shariah a Muslim women needs four Muslim men of good standing to witness the rape and testify in court. Otherwise she is considered guilty of adultery, which can lead to beatings and/or execution under government penalties. “Infidel” women often have no legal recourse. So a guy could literally rape someone in a dark alley with nobody around, and her testimony would mean nothing. But the government could still give her a beating or worse, if she confesses the encounter. I’m not even going into honor killings sanctioned by families. I’m sticking to straight-up shariah dispensed by the government.

And they wonder why rape statistics in Islamic countries are so low?

Who are we to judge another culture’s practices that were developed to protect society before medicine, electicity, agriculture, etc. was invented. Or to judge practices that were developed to insure that the alpha males had exclusive access to the most attractive females.

If they want to continue to mentally and physically mutilate women, children and other powerless people even though it is completely unecessary, barbaric and hideously cruel, who are we to judge?

Let’s restrict our judgement to members of our own society who practice even more barbaric cruelties…..like Christians and conservatives.

So much for “moderate.” Is there really such thing as “moderate Shariah law?” I think not. Some liberals buy properties in so-called moderate Dubai, like Brad Pitt / Jolie to give their children “world” experience. But the morons don’t recognize that holding hands is against the law, and often being in the same room alone with a member of the opposite gender is prohibited.

Someone should remind Obama that there is no “moderate Islam” if Shariah is involved.

Islamic values are spreading because the West is giving up its principles in the name of cultural tolerance.

For example, “The law also imposes severe sentences for rape, homosexuality, alcohol consumption and gambling.

Now when they say “rape” here, I assume by past news stories (out of the Muslim world), that the severe sentence is for the actual victim of the rape, not the perpetrators of the crime itself. I also assume that the adultery death sentance is strictly for the woman who are involved, not the men. They left out “honor killings”, so that must mean that’s still okay.

But the question that strikes me is the punishment for homosexuality. Since leftists love homosexual “rights”, shouldn’t they be out in mass protest in cities all over the world against killing gay people? Or is the BBC and their leftist allies so afraid of offending Islam, Sharia law, etc etc, they are certainly willing to throw the gay community under the bus in the name of appeasment?