Iraq Inks $100 Million Arms Deal - With China
From the DNC’s Washington Post:
Iraqis to Pay China $100 Million for Weapons for Police
Experts Fear More Will Go to Insurgents
![]()
By Robin Wright and Ann Scott Tyson
Thursday, October 4, 2007; A12Iraq has ordered $100 million worth of light military equipment from China for its police force, contending that the United States was unable to provide the materiel and is too slow to deliver arms shipments, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said yesterday.
The China deal, not previously made public, has alarmed military analysts who note that Iraq’s security forces already are unable to account for more than 190,000 weapons supplied by the United States, many of which are believed to be in the hands of Shiite and Sunni militias, insurgents and other forces seeking to destabilize Iraq and target U.S. troops…
The Chinese arms deal sheds light on the larger dispute between the United States and Iraq over rebuilding Iraq’s armed forces and police. Iraqi officials have long complained about the supply of weapons and equipment for their personnel, noting that Iraqi security forces often patrol in pickup trucks without body armor along the same routes as U.S. troops wearing flak jackets and riding in armored vehicles.
“There is general frustration in the Iraqi government at the rate in which Iraqi armed forces are being equipped and armed,” Iraqi Ambassador Samir Sumaidaie told reporters this summer. “This is a collaborative effort between the Iraqi government and the government of the United States, and the process is not moving quickly enough to improve the fighting capacity of Iraqi armed forces. A way must be found to improve this process.”
Talabani yesterday expressed frustration with the delays. “The capacity of the factories here are not enough to provide us quickly with all that we need, even for the army. One of our demands is to accelerate the delivery of the arms to the Iraqi army.” …
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the United States is “working closely” to help Iraq obtain “appropriate and necessary” military equipment. But U.S. officials concede delivery problems.
“We haven’t converted toaster factories to produce carbines and we’re working hard just to supply our own troops,” said an administration official involved with Iraq policy. “Our factories are working for our own troops. So it’s true we don’t have the ability to provide these rifles and other equipment they’re looking for.”
In 2004 and 2005, the United States bought 185,000 AK-47s from an Eastern European country — after Iraqis rejected U.S.-made M-16 assault rifles — as part of a $2.8 billion program to deliver military equipment to Iraq. But a recent Government Accountability Office report said that 110,000 of them were unaccounted for, with about 30 percent of all arms distributed to Iraqi forces by the United States since 2004 missing…
Ingrate, miserable — see Iraq.
Of course the Washington Post hardly even notices that aspect of the story.
But what will the Iraqis do when these weapons are recalled for having lead paint?
7 Responses to “Iraq Inks $100 Million Arms Deal - With China”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.



October 4th, 2007 at 12:44 pm
Uhm, short a few zeros in your headline there, ain’t cha?
October 4th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
Rifle? What rifle? I don’t know…its around here somewhere. Why?
October 4th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Someone help me out here please. In 2004-2005 WE bought the eastern euro AKs. Why WE were buying them baffles me but I digress…..who is paying for these Chinese weapons?
“But what will the Iraqis do when these weapons are recalled for having lead paint?”
Too funny SG.
October 4th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
“Uhm, short a few zeros in your headline there, ain’t cha?”
Thanks.
October 4th, 2007 at 2:35 pm
I hear the Chinese arms have lead in them.
AGGGHHHH!
October 4th, 2007 at 4:22 pm
This is real: the US Army is trying to develop leadless rifle ammunition. The M855 ball cartridge for the M16A2, M16A3, M16A4, M4 and M4A1 rifles and the M249 light machine gun family — all 5.56mm NATO weapons — might require a different rifling twist if the projectiles are to keep their current 62-63 grain weight. The M855 is the NATO SS-109, and if you think that Congress takes its sweet time doing things, go international!
Anyway, the article doesn’t mention which ‘light weapons’ the Iraqi polie are buying from China. 82mm mortars? 105mm recoiless rifles? ChiCom RPG-7’s? Infantry fighting vehicles with automatic 30mm cannon? These are “light weapons” by UN definitions. Imagine equating a .38 caliber revolver with a belt-fed .50 caliber machine gun–oh, wait: Schumer, Boxer, Feinstein, and other US Senators do!
Anyway, firearms are supposed to be dangerous. Lead is dense and gives weight to bullets.
October 4th, 2007 at 4:30 pm
You didn’t mention why they are trying to develop leadless ammo, but the reason is environmental. And you’re right, this round will kill you, but it’s environment friendly is just kind of crazy.