« 1500 Somalis Protest Muslim Defeat - In Minn | Home | Hundreds Injured In Eid Animal Sacrifices »

KGB Letter Details Kennedy Offer To USSR

This letter which details Senator Edward Kennedy’s offer to help the Soviet Union defeat Reagan’s efforts to build up the nuclear deterrent in Europe was unearthed by a Times of London reporter in the 1990s after the KGB files were opened.

It got little or no attention, however, until the publication of Paul Kengor’s book "The Crusader - Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism."

But even then the actual text of the letter (which is in the book’s appendix pp 317-320) has gotten short shrift:

Appendix
TEXT OF KGB LETTER ON SENATOR TED KENNEDY
_________________________________________

Special Importance
Committee on State Security of the USSR
14.05. 1983 No. 1029 Ch/OV
Moscow

Regarding Senator Kennedy’s request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Comrade Y.V. Andropov

Comrade Y.V. Andropov

On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant J. Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Center Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.

Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.

According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”

Naturally, not everything in the province of economics has gone according to Reagan’s plan. A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that many bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party. Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.

The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the resistence to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.

However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak. Reagan’s adversaries are divided and the presentations they make are not fully effective. Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda. In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the USA and the USSR are non-constructive, Reagan will grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic. At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted. Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans do not read serious newspapers or periodicals.

Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people. In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov:

1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.

If his proposals would be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit.

Kennedy thinks the benefits of a meeting with Y.V.Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for example, Mark Hatfield. Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political circles in the USA (In March of 1982, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project to freeze the nuclear arsenals of the USA and USSR and pblished a book on the theme as well.)

2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attact a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.

Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized. They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military term. This issue is quickly being distorted by Reagan’s administration.

Kennedy asked to convey that this appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is his effort to contribute a strong proposal that would root out the threat of nuclear war, and to improve Soviet-American relations, so that they define the safety of the world. Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y.V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders, who expressed their commitment to heal international affairs, and improve mutal understandings between peoples.

The senator underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal, the answer to which may be delivered through Tunney.

Having conveyed Kennedy’s appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Tunney also explained that Senator Kennedy has in the last few years actively made appearances to reduce the threat of war. Because he formally refused to partake in the election campaign of 1984, his speeches would be taken without prejudice as they are not tied to any campaign promises. Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future). Taken together, Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president. This would explain why he is convinced that none of the candidates today have a real chance at defeating Reagan.

We await instructions.

President of the committee
V. Chebrikov

Of course Ted Kennedy has always been the willing stooge of any enemy of this country.

But it is fitting that we should remember this perfidy at the close of 2006. May it strengthen our country’s resolve to try to prevent — or at least expose — his and others’ sedition in the future.

With Congress back in the control of the Democrats, we will be kept very busy.

Related Articles:

  Print Email

15 Responses to “KGB Letter Details Kennedy Offer To USSR”

  1. DGA

    One wonders what state the world would be in right now if leftist traitors like Red nose Ted had gotten their way. Like the plan to eradicate world terrorisim that Bush has, Reagan knew what he was doing all along. Democrats never seem to be able to see very far into the future, surely not further than their next election cycle, they never serve those who elect them, only self service is in order, and just aren’t able to see the forest for the trees.

  2. Teabag

    And decades later, Kennedy and the liberals are STILL trying to turn this country into a Communist state. Health care for all! We’ll have a health care system like Cuba’s - the best in the world! No unfair upper class!

    Thank God there are enough conservatives to keep them from destroying this country. They undermined President Reagan, and now they are undermining President Bush. Their actions are so loud it’s damned difficult to hear them when they claim they are patriots and love America. The are on the sides of terrorists and Communists. They deny that, but they fail to acknowledge the fact that the terrorists and Communists say the same things they do. What’s a thinking person to deduce from that?

    Hey, I’ll be the first to admit that President Bush and the Republicans have earned criticism. But the liberals are working tirelessly to undermine this country and empower the terrorists and the Communists. They don’t want terrorism defeated. For that, I will never forgive them.

  3. Gila Monster

    None of this would have occurred if Splash had been held accountable for his criminal actions on July 18th, 1969. DrunKennedy would not be a Senator today, well, maybe, there’s no telling how the people of MA vote. The fat bastard has been re-elected how many times..?? And then there’s John Effin’ Kerry and Barney Frank.

    Chappaquidick not withstanding, the “bloviating blimposaurus” from Hyannis should have been indicted for treason long ago.

  4. doingwhatican

    “It was all very careless and confused. They were careless people…..
    They smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.”
    - F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby -

    “Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law?
    Or is there one system for the average citizen
    and another for the high and mighty?”
    - Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 -

    “The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”
    - Plato -

    http://www.ytedk.com/bigted.htm

    Thar she blows, Demagogue Drunkennedy.

  5. Barb the Evil Genius

    It’s sad people like Splash Kennedy and John Effin’ Kerry and Sandy Burglar have not been shot as the treasonous wretches they are. Very scared for our country’s future sometimes.

  6. Media_man

    Who could possibly be even remotely surprised? The agenda for the DNC has always been the collapse of US defense so the $ could be re-distributed to domestic spending. The fact that the economy would collapse and there wouldn’t be any $ to fund anything never occurred to them, due to their economic illiteracy, never crossed their feeble minds.

  7. al

    I looked at the reviews on Amazon and I noticed that some people didn’t like Kengor’s assertion about Kennedy. I quick search yieled a great follow-up article from Kengor:

    FrontPage magazine.com :: The KGB’s Useful Idiots by Paul Kengor
    http://www.frontpagemag.com/Ar.....p?ID=26004

    Kennedy and his ilk really make me puke. After reading this stuff, what other word besides traitor is appropriate? On the positive side, the internet is allowing us to expose them. We just need more ways to pound the media and make them feel some guilt. (I think there is someway to do it.) -Al

  8. pagar

    I second the thought, we need to get this in front of every American we can. So far, I have gotten it on one other blog, but I intend to do more. We cannot surrender to these anti-Americans.

  9. pagar

    One of the other bloggers on the site I posted on found this info;

    http://findarticles.com/p/arti.....i_n9318614

    The last paragraph, with the ACLU is most interesting. Anyone who believes the ACLU is on America’s side is WRONG. Anyone who believes Sen Kennedy is on America’s side, will probably be surprised to learn he is largely responsible for America not being able to connect the dots before 9/11.

    Article mentions a book co written by the author of the article. Has anyone read it?

    Mr. Romerstein is a retired U.S. Government official. From 1978 to 1983 he was a Professional Staff member for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He is the author with the late Eric Breindel of The Venona Secrets, Exposing Soviet Espionage and America’s Traitors, and he is now working on a book on Soviet covert influence operations

  10. SG

    Thanks for posting that link to the Kengor article in FrontPage, Al. That’s a great read.

  11. SG

    Good work, Pagar.

    It amazes me how effectively our one party media (and the rest of our one party establishment) can still squelch stories like this.

  12. srsmith

    For any who are noticing the name Edward Kennedy:

    Ted Kennedy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kennedy

    shows that Ted Kennedy’s full name is Edward Moore Kennedy.

    I haven’t found anything contradicting this article. The following searches dig up many more who apparently also haven’t found any disputing evidence.

    tunney london times — kennedy soviet union reagan

  13. SG

    Here’s another link to the excellent article Pagar posted from the source at Human Events, which might be a little more readable:

    Ted Kennedy was a ‘Collaborationist’ by Herbert Romerstein - HUMAN EVENTS
    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=2535

  14. abby

    don’t forget he also sided with Jerry Adams, in Ireland and one of the Kennedys is married to one of those idiots.

  15. CKO1986

    How does anyone know Ted wasn’t just looking to score some free vodka? ;)


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« 1500 Somalis Protest Muslim Defeat - In Minn | Hundreds Injured In Eid Animal Sacrifices »