Comments on: Left Leaks Coleman Donor Credit Card #s

By: BillK

BillK — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:51:13 +0000

To be fair, no they didn’t, but they published the information a hacker found there:

http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....ent-138422

You may also remember that the alleged hacker is the son of a Democratic Tennessee state representative.

By: Al Morone

Al Morone — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:37:19 +0000

During the election, Wikileaks hacked into Sarah Palin’s email account:
http://wikileaks.org/leak/sara.....008/01.jpg

By: Barbie

Barbie — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:45:14 +0000

Then draw and quarter Coleman. Off with his head, if you will. BUt publishing the names of his contributors along with a chunk of sensitive data is not going after Coleman, now is it?

By: Perdido

Perdido — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:42:19 +0000

I beg to differ. Coleman should be drawn and quartered for gross incompetence. That information was entrusted to him and he failed miserably to protect it.

Off with his head.

By: wirenut

wirenut — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:47:02 +0000

# 1 Controversial Senator ……….Huh?
# 2 Republican……Sometimes !
# 3 Air-Franken, civil………..Never!
# 4 Re-do of the Sara Palin smear and intimidation tactics…..Hope and Change is on the march again !!!
Twilight , At least with Mr. Serling it was over in 30 minutes .

By: TwilightZoned

TwilightZoned — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:00:29 +0000

It just amazes me how low these guttersnipes are willing to go. Amazing, just amazing. I’m truly stuck smack dab in the middle of the twilight zone with little hope of getting out. Change we can believe in. Uh, huh. Lying, cheating, and general mayhem R us should be the slogan.

By: wardmama4

wardmama4 — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:52:24 +0000

Sounds to me like Franken is about to lose big and they are committing Watergate 2 (I, for the life of me can not understand what was so damn great about the era ’67 to ’77 that these losers keep wanting to repeat all of it over and over again) – to win.

Might someone not want to point them to the end of the story – Nixon resigned, Agnew, and what at least 7 others of the Administration were indicted and convicted?

Of course these are Democrats – so it is just another resume enhancement.

By: GL0120

GL0120 — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:47:38 +0000

Of course this was just an unfortunate accident; just like the scrubbing of all negative postings about TCO on Wikipedia is the result of over exuberant TCO supporters and certainly not sanctioned by Wikipedia.
You will agree won’t you?
It would be such a shame if your credit card, bank records, and medical records were to somehow end up posted on the internet, wouldn’t it now?
I knew you’d be reasonable, now just run along and play.

By: Barbie

Barbie — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:52:54 +0000

And what ‘evidence of injustice’ or ‘illegal activity’ has occurred? Contributing to Coleman’s campaign is illegal activity now?

By: curvyred

curvyred — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:41:08 +0000

“A place for journalists, truth tellers, and whistle blowers to leak (publish) personal accounts and evidence of injustice or illegal activity completely”

“We are of assistance to peoples of all countries who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and institutions. We aim for maximum political impact”

That is how they portray themselves – it left me speechless – how are they the “truth teller” by publishing private information related to credit?

By: catie

catie — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:04:45 +0000

That’s what I was wondering as well. Is there anyone here that is an attorney or a credit expert that would know? I find this most interesting because on my stupid AT & T front page it has a guy dressed like a Muslim extremist in front of a lap top with the slogan “Identity Theft-A High Rate Epidemic”. It would be easy for someone to treat themselves at the expense of Norm Coleman’s contributors. What was the point of them doing this? I truly fear for this country as I believe the left, their friends at google and idiots in tech who hack into people’s personal emails of those they perceive as an enemy (Sarah Palin). I’m betting it will be ignored by the TASS news agency.
BTW if it had been someone on Coleman’s staff who had leaked Frankenstein’s donor list with credit card numbers there would be hell to pay from his many donors in Hollywood (think about that the next time you want to plunk down $10 for a Tom Hanks movie) amongst other so called luminaries in that part of the world.

By: Barbie

Barbie — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:00:56 +0000

the lists, which are part of an enormous 4.3Gb database leak from the Coleman campaign

A leak? Sounds more like someone hacked into it. Is Wikileaks complicit? How’d they get this ‘sensitive’ database info? If they’re so concerned about the statute and outraged Coleman did not inform his donors, why is Wikileaks releasing this info at all? We all know the answer – Because it’s a ruse to, as pointed out in comments above, intimidate Coleman supporters just like what the fascists did to the prop 8 supporters in CA. Democrats = Fascists more and more every day.

By: curvyred

curvyred — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:49:01 +0000

I am not an attorney nor a credit expert – but isn’t what they are doing illegal?

Especially with releasing the code on the back of the cards, together with their names and last four digits of the card?

By: Helena

Helena — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:00:16 +0000

“Yesterday Wikileaks sent two notifications to Coleman’s supporters as a courtesy prior to releasing a subset of the data.

Well, that was mighty nice of them.

By: englishqueen01

englishqueen01 — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:48:16 +0000

So what’s the purpose of this? For the left to engage in Prop 8 style thuggery and protests of conservatives who dared not vote for Franken?

By: Colonel1961

Colonel1961 — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:44:34 +0000

Now more than ever, the 2nd Amendment.