"The pursuit of perfection, then, is the pursuit of Sweetness and Light. He who works for Sweetness and Light united, works to make reason and the will of God prevail." - Matthew Arnold

« Investigator Says Drop Haditha Marine’s Charges | Home | Ask The Imam - Can I Work At A McDonald’s? »

Look Who’s Combing The DC Madam’s Records

You probably already know the role the famous moral ethicist Larry Flynt claims to have had in exposing REPUBLICAN Senator David Vitter’s dealings with the DC Madam.

But what other searchers for truth has Ms. Palfrey favored with her phone log lists?

The Washington Post almost tells us, but as usual they only give us half the story. After all, they must protect their comrades in arms:


‘More Names Will Come Out,’ Lawyer in D.C. Escort Case Vows

By Sue Anne Pressley Montes

Wednesday, July 11, 2007; A02

For months, alleged D.C. madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey has promised that her voluminous phone records — all 46 pounds of them — contained some powerful secrets. Within hours of their public release, a senator acknowledged Monday night that his telephone number was on the list.

Now, groups such as one calling itself Citizens for Legitimate Government, which runs a liberal Web site, are poring over the records, hoping to translate the raw numbers into more names and revelations. Montgomery Blair Sibley, Palfrey’s civil attorney, said the records were given to 50 interested individuals or groups who “wanted to remain anonymous,” after a federal judge’s release of the records last week…

“Once more analysis is done, more names will come out,” Sibley said in an interview yesterday.

In a world where phone numbers change constantly, where it is as easy to dial a wrong number as a right one, the public posting of the alleged D.C. madam’s phone records has created a new commotion in a case that always aspired to be the next Washington sex scandal. It has raised the specter of wives searching frantically through records for their husbands’ numbers, of grudge-bearers buckling down to unearth dirt on their enemies, of political groups aiming arrows at their opponents.

Lori Price, who manages the Citizens for Legitimate Government Web site and writes its daily newsletter, said she is prepared to devote the time the project needs.

“I’ve got the air conditioning on and my coffee cup beside me, and we’ll be plodding through the list,” said Price, a part-time writer and editor from Bristol, Conn

Sibley said Palfrey needs as many names as possible to aid in her criminal defense. He described her as “a patriotic kind of girl from western Pennsylvania” who thinks citizens should know what their public officials are up to.”

Price, of Citizens for Legitimate Government, said she received a computer disk from Sibley “by snail mail” Monday that contained the full phone records. Since then, she said, she and three others have been trying to put names to the numbers, using Google and other Internet search engines.

We’re not going to harass anybody,” Price said.

Citizens for Legitimate Government was established in December 2000 “in the aftermath of what we perceive as the stolen 2000 presidential election,” Price said.

She became interested in the alleged D.C. madam case and began exchanging e-mails with Palfrey a while back, she said. She had to sign “a little contract” that promised not to profit from the records or post Palfrey’s relatives’ numbers.

“We were interested to see, with some of the family-values GOP stars, if there was any kind of contradiction to their daily life and what they’re espousing in public,” Price said. “We’re not here to hurt people. The hypocrisies are what we’re exposing.”

She added that she will also post the names of liberal-leaning officials if she finds them. “If one is doing an investigation, what I find out may not be what I want, but I’m not censoring to defend liberals,” she said.

No of course this group will be fair.

Never mind that this group was formed to prove to the world that the last two presidential elections were actually Republican political coups.

From their own “liberal website“:

Citizens For Legitimate Government™ is a multi-partisan activist group established to expose the Bush coup d’etat, and to oppose the Bush occupation in all of its manifestations.

Elsewhere on their “liberal website” the CFLP stirke out into every Republican conspiracy known to man — and then some.

(And while you are there, enjoy the literary efforts of the CFLP’s founder Michael Rectenwald PHD, Part One and Part Two.)

But to the Washington Post the CFLG is just another “liberal website” speaking truth to power – one sexual blackmail at a time.

Of course this is the way the media and the rest of the Democrat machine have operated for years.

Since they can’t win at the ballot box or the arena of ideas they must tar their opponents – criminalize them in the minds of the public — any way they can.

(Funny, but that is exactly what the Nazi Party did when they relentlessly demonized the duly elected representatives of the Weimar Republic as ”criminals” in their endless sewage of agit-prop and phony lawsuits.)

Never mind that there is almost never any actual criminality involved.

Lest we forget, one of the Democrats’ more recent scalps, Mark Foley was never found to have participated in any untoward let alone illegal activity.

Nevertheless the Democrats picked up another Congressional seat and probably many more besides with their campaign against the GOP’s outrageous “corruption.”

And for the DNC, Larry Flynt, the “Citizens For Legitimate Government” and our one party media power is all that counts.

Related Articles:

  Print Email

11 Responses to “Look Who’s Combing The DC Madam’s Records”

  1. BillK

    My favorite quote:

    “We’re not going to harass anybody,” Price said.

    Uh, yeah.

    DC Madam; can it actually be possible that Billy’s not in the logs somewhere?

  2. wardmama4

    Larry Flint and the Party who has a woman killer in one of it’s highest positions - should not be pointing a finger and saying shame at anyone. At All. Ever.

    Thanks for this link - that website is a hoot - and that group has just been so damn effective in the past, uhmm, let’s see, what is it, it’s coming to me now - 6.5 years - at getting rid of President Bush and overturning his coup.

    What crap.

  3. Old Grouch

    Anyone want to guess on the ratio of ‘Rats to GOP that these folks ‘find’?

  4. Zeusshiloh

    It is always Ironic that so many Liberal Groups have such patriotic names, that one would assume that these groups are patriotic Americans. That fallacy lasts for just a little while, until their true colors come out for all to see. They are anything but patriotic.

    By their fruits, ye shall know them…..

  5. The Redneck

    Zeus, Ann Coulter noted in her latest book that liberal groups are always throwing words they don’t believe into their names, like “Americans”, “Democratic”, or “Legitimate”.

    Meanwhile, wasn’t there a gag order on this stuff? How come no American groups are looking through these numbers?

  6. Lurkin_no_mo

    Larry Flynt? LARRY F’ing FLYNT? The Hustler guy? Come on, don’t bring a pornographer to point fingers on unethical conduct. I would also say it’s not unethical, but immoral, and best left between him, his wife, and the folks that voted for him.

  7. artboyusa

    Hii everryyonne, Laarrry Flynnnttt heerrre. You Righttt-Wingerrsss caann caall meee a porrrn kiinngg andd trryy tooo innshssuult meee alll yoouu waannt buutt everryonne knnoowwss I’mmm a valiannt crushaderrrr fooorrr freee speeechhh annddd thattt I alshso loookkk jussht like Woody Harrelson. So shtick thatt in yourrr pipe and shmoke it.

  8. BillK

    In all seriousness, none of this would work if Republicans weren’t so quick to toss their own overboard and/or to have them resign (or weren’t so quick to resign) in the face of controversy.

    If this were a Dem, they’d not only not resign, they’d be happy to tell you her working name, give out her number and rates, and provide a short review of her services, and they would suffer not one whit at the next election for it.

  9. Lurkin_no_mo

    …and if that’s a picture of the Madam in question, I would’ve saved my money. I’m assuming that it’s a photo of her attorney. What’s the hooker need an attorney for? Is she up on criminal charges? Or is she looking to make more profit from this incident?

  10. retire05

    As I have told you before, the fact that the judge allowed her to go public with the phone numbers during an on-going trial should bother you. This is just another case of a judge, like the one in the Libby trial, overstepping his boundaries and you can only assume that it is for political reasons. When has evidence (and the phone records are considered evidence) been given out during a trial before a verdict was reached? Oh, yeah, once, in the Fitzmagoo fiasco.
    Perhaps we need the phone records of the judge himself to see what Dhimmicrats inside the beltway called him to find out if their number was on the list and if it wasn’t, to pressure the judge to release those records. And who is the prosecutor on this case? Why didn’t they block the release of these phone records?
    Somehow, I don’t think an out of control judiciary is what the founding fathers had in mind when they constructed a three part goverment to provide checks and balances.

    This case is not about a hooker. It is about harming as many people in D.C. as it can. And you can bet the conversation is going something like this:

    Assistant: Look Lori, here is a number that matches Congressman (R).

    Lori: Release it.

    Assistant: And this one. It belongs to Senator (D).

    Lori: Call him and verify it. Perhaps it was just a misdialed number. If not, then find an aide to pin it on. But don’t release the name until we have him covered.

  11. 1sttofight

    The head of the LCG was on Tucker Carlson’s show yesterday and went slobbering crazy.

    You are despicable . . . you’re an unapologetic Republican partisan . . . you only turned against Bush when everything went down the toilet . . . you’re a preppy punk, parading your bow-tie [NB: Tucker wasn't wearing one] . . . once you got done destroying our candidates, you wanted [politicians' sex lives] to be off limits . . . you are nothing . . . you worked for the National Review!

    Carlson has never worked for the National Review.

    http://newsbusters.org/node/14035


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« Investigator Says Drop Haditha Marine’s Charges | Ask The Imam - Can I Work At A McDonald’s? »