<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Irate At Miss CA’s ‘Topless’ Photo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-146349</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-146349</guid>
		<description>Lighten up, Francis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lighten up, Francis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yadayada</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145932</link>
		<dc:creator>yadayada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145932</guid>
		<description>&quot;The newly surfaced photos are not sitting well with her conservative Christian supporters.&quot;

perhaps they could provide a few names to bolster their claim. I surfed a few blogs and news outlets and could not find one remark from an easily recognized known christian who is turning their back on her. I&#039;m a christian, I supported her comments and right to express her beliefs in the pageant. I don&#039;t find that photo offensive. 

there are racier bubble bath commercials on tv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The newly surfaced photos are not sitting well with her conservative Christian supporters.&#8221;</p>
<p>perhaps they could provide a few names to bolster their claim. I surfed a few blogs and news outlets and could not find one remark from an easily recognized known christian who is turning their back on her. I&#8217;m a christian, I supported her comments and right to express her beliefs in the pageant. I don&#8217;t find that photo offensive. </p>
<p>there are racier bubble bath commercials on tv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icarus</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145743</link>
		<dc:creator>Icarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145743</guid>
		<description>Of course we come into this world naked…  it would be very strange to see a fully clothed babe come forth!

Gen 3:21 &quot;The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife, and &lt;b&gt; clothed them&lt;/b&gt;&quot;
Why do you suppsoe he did this?


As far as i know (understand and feel) we are to rejoice in the creator not  creation.

If you mean that Carrie did a good thing by her statemnt on marriage you are right!
and of course; we shouldn&#039;t be ashamed of God&#039;&#039;s creations.

Blessings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we come into this world naked…  it would be very strange to see a fully clothed babe come forth!</p>
<p>Gen 3:21 &#8220;The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife, and <b> clothed them</b>&#8221;<br />
Why do you suppsoe he did this?</p>
<p>As far as i know (understand and feel) we are to rejoice in the creator not  creation.</p>
<p>If you mean that Carrie did a good thing by her statemnt on marriage you are right!<br />
and of course; we shouldn&#8217;t be ashamed of God&#8221;s creations.</p>
<p>Blessings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145736</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145736</guid>
		<description>Precisely. The beast fears the righteous. Nudity is not pornography. It is a celebration of creation! IF that&#039;s how you look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precisely. The beast fears the righteous. Nudity is not pornography. It is a celebration of creation! IF that&#8217;s how you look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145735</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145735</guid>
		<description>Excellent rant! I approve. I&#039;ve already said my bit lower down the page. Nudity is not a sin, unless you are unable to divide the lust of base humanity from the joy of being how God made you to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent rant! I approve. I&#8217;ve already said my bit lower down the page. Nudity is not a sin, unless you are unable to divide the lust of base humanity from the joy of being how God made you to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145734</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145734</guid>
		<description>Roger that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145733</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145733</guid>
		<description>What is Gods will? That we do the best we can for him. Why do these people freak so hard? Because they cannot divide the rejoicing of creation vs the basest lust of mankind. It is what is in your heart that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Gods will? That we do the best we can for him. Why do these people freak so hard? Because they cannot divide the rejoicing of creation vs the basest lust of mankind. It is what is in your heart that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Make Great Speedbumps</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145732</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Make Great Speedbumps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145732</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s Trump but I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll milk it for all it&#039;s worth as usual. There are people who are pissed and want to destroy Ms. Prejean by any means possible. The other case, Miss Kentucky (Tara Connor) was seen drinking underage, tested positive for coke and supposedly doing inappropriate things with Miss Teen USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s Trump but I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll milk it for all it&#8217;s worth as usual. There are people who are pissed and want to destroy Ms. Prejean by any means possible. The other case, Miss Kentucky (Tara Connor) was seen drinking underage, tested positive for coke and supposedly doing inappropriate things with Miss Teen USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145731</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145731</guid>
		<description>As I have said elsewhere about this. We come into this world naked, if you will, we were created naked. Carrie is a Christian, and not ashamed of her creation. Must one automatically be a prude if one is a Christian? God created us that way, and boy was He upset when we were ashamed of His creation. I think Carrie did a good thing, and I wish she would espouse (which she pretty much has, but needs to be even louder) that fact. Naked beauty and toxic lust are two entirely different creatures. One is rejoicing in creation, the other merely base savagery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have said elsewhere about this. We come into this world naked, if you will, we were created naked. Carrie is a Christian, and not ashamed of her creation. Must one automatically be a prude if one is a Christian? God created us that way, and boy was He upset when we were ashamed of His creation. I think Carrie did a good thing, and I wish she would espouse (which she pretty much has, but needs to be even louder) that fact. Naked beauty and toxic lust are two entirely different creatures. One is rejoicing in creation, the other merely base savagery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145632</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145632</guid>
		<description>You know what I have really enjoyed in reading the comments here?  The amount of red blooded American male appreciation for a beautiful body showing up in this thread!   LOL  (Not that I find that surprising ;-D )

I&#039;m a devout Christian, and while I wouldn&#039;t suggest she pose for these photos, she is not exposing as much as I have seen on any beach.  

Even with the photo she looks like the &quot;girl next door&quot;.  A little teasing, but decent. 

Compare her with the behavior of...oh say...the Gay&#039;s and Lesbos.   Compared them she is wholesome.  Think about what you could scrape up on them!  Of course THAT would be just fine.  Protected in fact.  If you disagree with THEIR behavior, you are quilty of a hate thought crime.  Why shouldn&#039;t they be quilty of the same here?  (retrorical)

She preforms in a completely hetrosexual way and she gets trashed...ONLY because of her beliefs in Christ.  If she didn&#039;t have strong faith not one dang thing would have been said.

If this is the worst she does, she will be fine.

I wish more people had the courage to stand by their beliefs in Christ.  I&#039;m in her corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I have really enjoyed in reading the comments here?  The amount of red blooded American male appreciation for a beautiful body showing up in this thread!   LOL  (Not that I find that surprising ;-D )</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a devout Christian, and while I wouldn&#8217;t suggest she pose for these photos, she is not exposing as much as I have seen on any beach.  </p>
<p>Even with the photo she looks like the &#8220;girl next door&#8221;.  A little teasing, but decent. </p>
<p>Compare her with the behavior of&#8230;oh say&#8230;the Gay&#8217;s and Lesbos.   Compared them she is wholesome.  Think about what you could scrape up on them!  Of course THAT would be just fine.  Protected in fact.  If you disagree with THEIR behavior, you are quilty of a hate thought crime.  Why shouldn&#8217;t they be quilty of the same here?  (retrorical)</p>
<p>She preforms in a completely hetrosexual way and she gets trashed&#8230;ONLY because of her beliefs in Christ.  If she didn&#8217;t have strong faith not one dang thing would have been said.</p>
<p>If this is the worst she does, she will be fine.</p>
<p>I wish more people had the courage to stand by their beliefs in Christ.  I&#8217;m in her corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145624</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145624</guid>
		<description>Still another reason not to support &quot;gay marriage&quot;.

Human behaviour is nearly infinite in its complexity.   There are people who puke at the thought of homosexual behaviours, and there are people who puke at the thought of heterosexual behaviours.   The vast majority of people are committed heterosexuals, and a few percent are committed homosexuals.   But since sexual behaviours are nearly infinite, there are a lot of people who can engage in both kinds of behavior, and essentially choose which way to go.  It&#039;s not a large percentage, but it&#039;s probably more people than are hard-core homosexuals.  Most of that group in the middle live as heterosexuals and you will never know that they could have gone the other way

But the queers want you to believe it&#039;s a switch, don&#039;t they?  Either you are gay or you are straight.  No choice, no thought, hard-wired from the moment of conception.

And why do you think that is?  Several reasons.  The most important is self-justification.  They want to forgive themselves for it.   But they also like the idea of an expanded &quot;partner pool&quot;, and don&#039;t want to be resticted for mining that pool.

Now, think about your kids and their kids, and theirs.   A few of them could fall into that middle ground.  They can choose live lives of quiet or angry desperation by going to the queer side, or they can have a better chance for happiness by going to the heterosexual side.   

Do you have a preference for your family members?

If you do, you might consider whether or not &quot;gay marriage&quot; is a factor that might convince somebody that being gay is perfectly normal and ok, with no downside consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still another reason not to support &#8220;gay marriage&#8221;.</p>
<p>Human behaviour is nearly infinite in its complexity.   There are people who puke at the thought of homosexual behaviours, and there are people who puke at the thought of heterosexual behaviours.   The vast majority of people are committed heterosexuals, and a few percent are committed homosexuals.   But since sexual behaviours are nearly infinite, there are a lot of people who can engage in both kinds of behavior, and essentially choose which way to go.  It&#8217;s not a large percentage, but it&#8217;s probably more people than are hard-core homosexuals.  Most of that group in the middle live as heterosexuals and you will never know that they could have gone the other way</p>
<p>But the queers want you to believe it&#8217;s a switch, don&#8217;t they?  Either you are gay or you are straight.  No choice, no thought, hard-wired from the moment of conception.</p>
<p>And why do you think that is?  Several reasons.  The most important is self-justification.  They want to forgive themselves for it.   But they also like the idea of an expanded &#8220;partner pool&#8221;, and don&#8217;t want to be resticted for mining that pool.</p>
<p>Now, think about your kids and their kids, and theirs.   A few of them could fall into that middle ground.  They can choose live lives of quiet or angry desperation by going to the queer side, or they can have a better chance for happiness by going to the heterosexual side.   </p>
<p>Do you have a preference for your family members?</p>
<p>If you do, you might consider whether or not &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; is a factor that might convince somebody that being gay is perfectly normal and ok, with no downside consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145593</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145593</guid>
		<description>This is all Donald Trump&#039;s doing for publicity.

Wasn&#039;t there a similar &quot;problem&quot; with a recent Miss USA that the Donald had to straighten out?

Seems that I remember two or three women being caught nude or dirty talking or being anti-something at about the same time.  Or am I thinking of John &quot;Honest, it is my own hair&quot; Edwards&#039; baby?

I can&#039;t keep up.  Sarah Palin is her own daughter and niece, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all Donald Trump&#8217;s doing for publicity.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t there a similar &#8220;problem&#8221; with a recent Miss USA that the Donald had to straighten out?</p>
<p>Seems that I remember two or three women being caught nude or dirty talking or being anti-something at about the same time.  Or am I thinking of John &#8220;Honest, it is my own hair&#8221; Edwards&#8217; baby?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t keep up.  Sarah Palin is her own daughter and niece, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MinnesotaRush</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145591</link>
		<dc:creator>MinnesotaRush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145591</guid>
		<description>Right on, PR! I&#039;d add JEALOUS, too!

I mean, gosh, Bronx federal appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor or this cutie(???).

I&#039;m going with Caleee-for-knee-a!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, PR! I&#8217;d add JEALOUS, too!</p>
<p>I mean, gosh, Bronx federal appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor or this cutie(???).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going with Caleee-for-knee-a!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145587</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145587</guid>
		<description>Yeah but snortin&#039; coke on camera while your Dad&#039;s VP is a matter of privacy right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but snortin&#8217; coke on camera while your Dad&#8217;s VP is a matter of privacy right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmcdonald</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145580</link>
		<dc:creator>jrmcdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145580</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is a &#039;Boy Kisser&#039; underground in the media. Why else these daily attacks on a Beauty Queen? I think Carrie Prejean, like Sarah Palin, drive the BK media crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is a &#8216;Boy Kisser&#8217; underground in the media. Why else these daily attacks on a Beauty Queen? I think Carrie Prejean, like Sarah Palin, drive the BK media crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odie44</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145579</link>
		<dc:creator>Odie44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/media-miss-ca-defends-topless-photos#comment-145579</guid>
		<description>http://www.mdaltd.com/portfolio.aspx

Here is his portfolio... notice anything? He is a cut and paste traditional direct marketing hack who claims to be a &quot;brand and marketing expert&quot;... pleeeeeeeease. 

I work in the industry and can attest to 2 things: 
1) every moron claims to be a brand expert, 
2) Anyone who calls themselves an &quot;expert&quot; in their field is not an expert

His hubris and ignorance is hysterical - being he viloates rule #1 of any agency - &quot;it&#039;s never about you&quot; , so stop posting Quicktime videos of your thoughts, and stop giving your blatant political issues as &quot;marketing advice&quot; especially when your an idiot for the world to hear and see.

I am putting in calls to his clients and asking them if they stand by his claims. Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mdaltd.com/portfolio.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.mdaltd.com/portfolio.aspx</a></p>
<p>Here is his portfolio&#8230; notice anything? He is a cut and paste traditional direct marketing hack who claims to be a &#8220;brand and marketing expert&#8221;&#8230; pleeeeeeeease. </p>
<p>I work in the industry and can attest to 2 things:<br />
1) every moron claims to be a brand expert,<br />
2) Anyone who calls themselves an &#8220;expert&#8221; in their field is not an expert</p>
<p>His hubris and ignorance is hysterical &#8211; being he viloates rule #1 of any agency &#8211; &#8220;it&#8217;s never about you&#8221; , so stop posting Quicktime videos of your thoughts, and stop giving your blatant political issues as &#8220;marketing advice&#8221; especially when your an idiot for the world to hear and see.</p>
<p>I am putting in calls to his clients and asking them if they stand by his claims. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

