New NIE Sees Progress In Iraq - Media Despairs
From a despondent New York Times:
U.S. Study Finds Progress in Iraq, but Fragile Security and Potential for Terror Attacks
By MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITT
April 4, 2008WASHINGTON—A new National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq cites significant security improvements and progress toward healing sectarian political rifts, but concludes that security remains fragile and terrorist groups remain capable of initiating large attacks, several American government officials said this week.
The classified document provides a more upbeat analysis of conditions in Iraq than the last major assessment by United States spy agencies, last summer. It was completed this week, just days before the top American commander in Iraq, Gen. David H. Petraeus, is due in Washington to give lawmakers a progress report on the military strategy in Iraq.
While the last assessment painted a grim picture of an Iraqi government paralyzed by sectarian strife, the new intelligence estimate cites slow but steady progress by Iraqi politicians on forging alliances between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq, said the government officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the document is classified.
At the same time, officials said that the document detailed several factors that could reverse these trends: including a campaign of violence by Shiite splinter groups and the possibility that the government would not carry out a series of reconciliation laws Iraq’s Parliament passed recently. Some Bush administration officials said that the report presented positive news, but they remained cautious about the future.
“The N.I.E. update confirmed that the surge strategy the president announced in January of last year is working,” said one senior administration official. “There’s more work to be done, but progress has obviously been made.” …
How about that headline? The Times can’t let anyone get the impression that the news from Iraq is good.
Meanwhile the Washington Post is quoting that maven of foreign policy, Mr. Joseph Biden thusly:
"The stuff that was positive, they emphasized. The negative, they stated, but deemphasized," said Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.). Biden chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which was briefed on the intelligence estimate early this week.
"I was discouraged" by the assessment, Biden said. "I was discouraged by the last one, too."
Of course he is discouraged. His side (the terrorists) are losing.
We have a similar insight from another Solon of the Senate, Carl Levin, via CNN:
"In my judgment it’s too rosy, but there are parts of it that are not so rosy and both pieces need to be declassified," Sen. Carl Levin told CNN, pointing in particular to the portion of the report describing Iraq’s political progress…
Luckily for Messers Biden and Levin and the rest of the defeat-at-any-price Democrats this will be the first and last time we ever hear about this much too positive NIE.
Related Articles:
- GOP Seek Review of NIE Iran Intelligence
- NYT Leaks Details Behind NIE Shift On Iran
- WSJ Says NIE Authors Have Partisan Histories
- Democrats Pounce On 'No Nukes' NIE Claim
- NIE: Iran's Nuclear Intentions, Capabilities
- Shocker: UN Says NIE Matches Their Findings
- NYT: US Knows Iran Ended Its Nuke Program
- NYT Exaggerates NIE Report - To Get Maliki
- AP: It's Harder/Easier For Al Qaeda To Attack US
3 Responses to “New NIE Sees Progress In Iraq - Media Despairs”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.




April 4th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
NYT to The World: Sure they (the NYT must refer to Americans as “they” rather than “we”; they wouldn’t want to discredit their “journalistic integrity” by identifying with a particular side in this war) have overthrown a power-mad, evil dictator, and set up a democracy in a part of the world that the NYT assured everyone would never accept democracy. But don’t get too happy about it becuase there is still the “Potential for Terrorist Attacks”.
Stop the presses, there is the possibility of violence? In the Middle East? Whaaaat?
In other News: Mazzetti and Schmidtt, had to take time off from contributing to “hard news” pieces about what a peaceful religion Islam is, in order to take time to read the NIE report. In response, Muslims killed several people. (But we’ll be assured tomorrow that they weren’t practicing true Islam.) I’m just kidding, Mazzetti and Schmidtt didn’t actually read the report.
April 4th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
NYT says… “The classified document……”
So how did these two idiots get there hands on it?
I can’t wait for CNN’s spin on this. I’m sure someone will charge:
Bush cooked the books and pressured the analysts to change their reports! Waaaaaaa..waaaaa..waaaaa…… he can’t be winning.
April 7th, 2008 at 7:26 am
WI, good seeing ya back. Saw your post from yesterday. Missed ya.