<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Republic&#8217;s Case Against Sotomayor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148115</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148115</guid>
		<description>Well, Obomie credits Michello the most. Moonlighting on the clock. Obomie says politics today is a business and not a mission, something he proved. But, he doesn&#039;t give Republicans acknowledgement for providing him a free office to write, and free private school for little ones. I get the Kansas and Texas stories of racism his grandparents spoke of while living there, but not Oklahoma lumped in the three, unless that is connected to his grandmother&#039;s Cherokee blood that comes in handy for free stuff. Course, his California education and his drug fog, left him with empty pockets when he arrived in NYC and slept in an alley, to wake up and see an ugly whitie staring down on him. But, his muslim friend took him in.  White men all have fat sweaty necks like his Grandpa&#039;s. 
Obombio describes Nancy Pelosi with perverse liberalism and greedy trail lawyers compared on the other hand to conservatives as religious zealots and oil greedy.

Didn&#039;t see any work, mow a lawn, fast food, like youth making it through school. Did scrub the tub before a relative from Kenyan. A family that&#039;s flown more than most in the Air Force pilot, I&#039;d say. Private planes as Senator. And 
when the others on the Committee visit to Iraq, 
the only one that left after a day and half, (couldn&#039;t find anyone to side with him on Iraq) so, flew around the surrounding poor countries and listened to the Palenstines spew venom against Isreal.  Talking about an oil hog!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Obomie credits Michello the most. Moonlighting on the clock. Obomie says politics today is a business and not a mission, something he proved. But, he doesn&#8217;t give Republicans acknowledgement for providing him a free office to write, and free private school for little ones. I get the Kansas and Texas stories of racism his grandparents spoke of while living there, but not Oklahoma lumped in the three, unless that is connected to his grandmother&#8217;s Cherokee blood that comes in handy for free stuff. Course, his California education and his drug fog, left him with empty pockets when he arrived in NYC and slept in an alley, to wake up and see an ugly whitie staring down on him. But, his muslim friend took him in.  White men all have fat sweaty necks like his Grandpa&#8217;s.<br />
Obombio describes Nancy Pelosi with perverse liberalism and greedy trail lawyers compared on the other hand to conservatives as religious zealots and oil greedy.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t see any work, mow a lawn, fast food, like youth making it through school. Did scrub the tub before a relative from Kenyan. A family that&#8217;s flown more than most in the Air Force pilot, I&#8217;d say. Private planes as Senator. And<br />
when the others on the Committee visit to Iraq,<br />
the only one that left after a day and half, (couldn&#8217;t find anyone to side with him on Iraq) so, flew around the surrounding poor countries and listened to the Palenstines spew venom against Isreal.  Talking about an oil hog!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148039</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148039</guid>
		<description>MO a liar? I can&#039;t believe you just called the most wonderful, caring, giving, smartest, devoted, self centered biatch for a First Lady(?) a liar.
If you&#039;re not careful she&#039;ll take off her lobster bib and wipe her buttery fingers in your hair!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MO a liar? I can&#8217;t believe you just called the most wonderful, caring, giving, smartest, devoted, self centered biatch for a First Lady(?) a liar.<br />
If you&#8217;re not careful she&#8217;ll take off her lobster bib and wipe her buttery fingers in your hair!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148035</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148035</guid>
		<description>pro ......... you forgot one important constant for becoming a angry, ugly, liberal beach .................. noticeable facial hair!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pro &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; you forgot one important constant for becoming a angry, ugly, liberal beach &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; noticeable facial hair!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catie</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148014</link>
		<dc:creator>catie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148014</guid>
		<description>Yeah, according to Obama and this individual no one can make it in America, especially when a Republican is in charge.  Yet as Rush pointed out yesterday to millions but what I have thought all along, these clowns got to the finest universities and law schools in this country while whining that &quot;you can&#039;t succeed in America if you&#039;re a minority&quot;.  This annoys me to no end.  When I decided that I wanted to go to law school I applied at Northwestern-where my brother went in the late 80&#039;s.  I had a high LSAT score but did not get in.  A person I worked with also decided to go to law school the following year and also applied to Northwestern with a crummy LSAT score but she got in.  She was Hispanic-I was not.  This was in 1995 and 96.  I had to go into the part-time program at Regent because I had to work while going to school.  I left after my first year to get married and with a 20K loan in tow.  But Melinda went for free and she had crappy undergraduate grades as well.  And they continue to tell us that it&#039;s all whitey&#039;s fault.  
Yeah, she&#039;s not only ugly on the outside but she is on the inside as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, according to Obama and this individual no one can make it in America, especially when a Republican is in charge.  Yet as Rush pointed out yesterday to millions but what I have thought all along, these clowns got to the finest universities and law schools in this country while whining that &#8220;you can&#8217;t succeed in America if you&#8217;re a minority&#8221;.  This annoys me to no end.  When I decided that I wanted to go to law school I applied at Northwestern-where my brother went in the late 80&#8242;s.  I had a high LSAT score but did not get in.  A person I worked with also decided to go to law school the following year and also applied to Northwestern with a crummy LSAT score but she got in.  She was Hispanic-I was not.  This was in 1995 and 96.  I had to go into the part-time program at Regent because I had to work while going to school.  I left after my first year to get married and with a 20K loan in tow.  But Melinda went for free and she had crappy undergraduate grades as well.  And they continue to tell us that it&#8217;s all whitey&#8217;s fault.<br />
Yeah, she&#8217;s not only ugly on the outside but she is on the inside as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148010</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148010</guid>
		<description>She lived in the Bronx projects, and her mother was a nurse?  The mother was an immigrant.  

Ya know, Michello was going into her story of her first date with Obama where he took her to a museum, and she fell in love. (like he&#039;s such an intellect) 

Yet, Michello&#039;s Wikipedia site, says it was at  Wesley Snipes movie, and that her being only black woman at law firm, her co-workers say there quite a few. After all civil rights? 

Wesly Snipes also said Obama told him, their first date was seeing his movie &quot;Do the Right Thing&quot; 

Course Snipes sure got out of paying millions of taxes. 
 says Obama told him, their first date was seeing his movie &quot;Do the Right Thing&quot;, and on Micheelo&#039;s site on Wikipedia, her co-workers say she was dishonest about her being only black woman. That there were several at the law form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She lived in the Bronx projects, and her mother was a nurse?  The mother was an immigrant.  </p>
<p>Ya know, Michello was going into her story of her first date with Obama where he took her to a museum, and she fell in love. (like he&#8217;s such an intellect) </p>
<p>Yet, Michello&#8217;s Wikipedia site, says it was at  Wesley Snipes movie, and that her being only black woman at law firm, her co-workers say there quite a few. After all civil rights? </p>
<p>Wesly Snipes also said Obama told him, their first date was seeing his movie &#8220;Do the Right Thing&#8221; </p>
<p>Course Snipes sure got out of paying millions of taxes.<br />
 says Obama told him, their first date was seeing his movie &#8220;Do the Right Thing&#8221;, and on Micheelo&#8217;s site on Wikipedia, her co-workers say she was dishonest about her being only black woman. That there were several at the law form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148009</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148009</guid>
		<description>The Oath: without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich...impartially 

US Federal Code of Regulations Titel 28 Part I Chapter 21 .453

Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.” 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000453----000-.html

I haven&#039;t been able to find her religion, but even the muslim&#039;s believe in God, it&#039;s just if a muslim breaks a vow to God, their tongue is cut out. [: o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oath: without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich&#8230;impartially </p>
<p>US Federal Code of Regulations Titel 28 Part I Chapter 21 .453</p>
<p>Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.” </p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000453----000-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc.....-000-.html</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been able to find her religion, but even the muslim&#8217;s believe in God, it&#8217;s just if a muslim breaks a vow to God, their tongue is cut out. [: o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148007</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148007</guid>
		<description>And she wrote a biography about herself. Doesn&#039;t like white high skilled Fire-Workers?  Doesn&#039;t like white male Judges Proud to be Latino, but not proud to be American? Another sob story of growing up poor, but getting all that 
free education from America ?  Poor thing. 

Well, Obambies comment about the 14th amendment, and this pick, may imply she is to rewrite the citizen and naturalization laws for his free borders amnesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And she wrote a biography about herself. Doesn&#8217;t like white high skilled Fire-Workers?  Doesn&#8217;t like white male Judges Proud to be Latino, but not proud to be American? Another sob story of growing up poor, but getting all that<br />
free education from America ?  Poor thing. </p>
<p>Well, Obambies comment about the 14th amendment, and this pick, may imply she is to rewrite the citizen and naturalization laws for his free borders amnesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148003</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-148003</guid>
		<description>Correct, Howard.  I guess that&#039;s what all this &#039;empathy&#039; crap is about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct, Howard.  I guess that&#8217;s what all this &#8216;empathy&#8217; crap is about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147999</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147999</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that this is all part of the plan of attack from Barry&#039;s camp--the &#039;Harriet Myers strategy&#039;?  That is, to throw out a &quot;loser&quot; in the first one or two pitches, knowing they&#039;re going to be batted down immediately by the oppostion, while attracting just enough Democrats to join in because they&#039;re nearing election time?

Either way, Barry wins.  If she&#039;s not confirmned, TCO uses it to further smear the Conservatives as woefully out of touch, and &quot;misogynist, elitist, and bigoted&quot;.  If she wins, he&#039;s got himself a soldier for life in the highest court in the land.

Has anyone noticed how opposition is being framed from the media talking heads?  Twice, today (Fox news/Charlie Rose), I&#039;ve heard the pro-Sotomayor question as being one of these 2 choices:
A)  Life in 1789 being inflicted on us now (anti-Solomayor solution)
B)  The Legal parameters that allow for a Third World perspective to guide our way through this living Constitution, which recognizes the many evolutions of change, spirit, and industry since 1789, to include an Amendment to end slavery, give women the vote, and love all things multicultural.

It is, of course, a strawman argument.  Their frame of the oppostion to Sotomayor stemming from an [originalist] argument that supposedly sees the Constitution as having remained static since 1789 is a misrepresentation of what it means to be originalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that this is all part of the plan of attack from Barry&#8217;s camp&#8211;the &#8216;Harriet Myers strategy&#8217;?  That is, to throw out a &#8220;loser&#8221; in the first one or two pitches, knowing they&#8217;re going to be batted down immediately by the oppostion, while attracting just enough Democrats to join in because they&#8217;re nearing election time?</p>
<p>Either way, Barry wins.  If she&#8217;s not confirmned, TCO uses it to further smear the Conservatives as woefully out of touch, and &#8220;misogynist, elitist, and bigoted&#8221;.  If she wins, he&#8217;s got himself a soldier for life in the highest court in the land.</p>
<p>Has anyone noticed how opposition is being framed from the media talking heads?  Twice, today (Fox news/Charlie Rose), I&#8217;ve heard the pro-Sotomayor question as being one of these 2 choices:<br />
A)  Life in 1789 being inflicted on us now (anti-Solomayor solution)<br />
B)  The Legal parameters that allow for a Third World perspective to guide our way through this living Constitution, which recognizes the many evolutions of change, spirit, and industry since 1789, to include an Amendment to end slavery, give women the vote, and love all things multicultural.</p>
<p>It is, of course, a strawman argument.  Their frame of the oppostion to Sotomayor stemming from an [originalist] argument that supposedly sees the Constitution as having remained static since 1789 is a misrepresentation of what it means to be originalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147998</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147998</guid>
		<description>Try this from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=2243&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Federal Judicial Center&lt;/a&gt; for a quick summary.

Here&#039;s a little more from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/judgesbio.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit&lt;/a&gt;.

Cases where she has written opinions appear here:  http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/144e90b4-7041-40e2-8a88-668c948dac04/1-10/list/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this from the <a href="http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=2243" rel="nofollow">Federal Judicial Center</a> for a quick summary.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a little more from the <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/judgesbio.htm" rel="nofollow">US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit</a>.</p>
<p>Cases where she has written opinions appear here:  <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/144e90b4-7041-40e2-8a88-668c948dac04/1-10/list/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/de.....1-10/list/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147995</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147995</guid>
		<description>Right on, Colonel.  

My question is, if being Latina makes her have more &quot;common touch&quot;, then by implication, she &lt;em&gt;won&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; have that &quot;common touch&quot; when one of my Appalachian-bred, tobacco-spittin&#039;, mountain brothers comes before her bench in some case to be tried, correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Colonel.  </p>
<p>My question is, if being Latina makes her have more &#8220;common touch&#8221;, then by implication, she <em>won&#8217;t</em> have that &#8220;common touch&#8221; when one of my Appalachian-bred, tobacco-spittin&#8217;, mountain brothers comes before her bench in some case to be tried, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147992</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147992</guid>
		<description>This one statement, regardless of circumstance, context, or other apologista, is grotesque: 

‘I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.’  

I guess white males can&#039;t have &#039;richness of experience&#039;.  Ugh.  She is blatantly disqualified for myriad bigotry.  And, by the way, she can go rot in Hell for insulting my race and gender…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one statement, regardless of circumstance, context, or other apologista, is grotesque: </p>
<p>‘I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.’  </p>
<p>I guess white males can&#8217;t have &#8216;richness of experience&#8217;.  Ugh.  She is blatantly disqualified for myriad bigotry.  And, by the way, she can go rot in Hell for insulting my race and gender…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12 Gauge Rage</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147990</link>
		<dc:creator>12 Gauge Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147990</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a link where I can read the full bio on Sotomayor? I&#039;d like to know what we&#039;re up against here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a link where I can read the full bio on Sotomayor? I&#8217;d like to know what we&#8217;re up against here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147989</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147989</guid>
		<description>No kiddin&#039;, could she be any uglier?  RBG wasn&#039;t that homely!  Heck, even Bork was better looking, for goodness&#039; sake!  lol

Maybe there&#039;s something to this physiognomy stuff after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kiddin&#8217;, could she be any uglier?  RBG wasn&#8217;t that homely!  Heck, even Bork was better looking, for goodness&#8217; sake!  lol</p>
<p>Maybe there&#8217;s something to this physiognomy stuff after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147986</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147986</guid>
		<description>Agreed: Miss Coulter&#039;s Thursday web offerings pack more jolt than a cocaine enema.  This one, should be a Duesie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed: Miss Coulter&#8217;s Thursday web offerings pack more jolt than a cocaine enema.  This one, should be a Duesie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147983</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/new-republics-case-against-sotomayor#comment-147983</guid>
		<description>Welcome back Dulimergirl,   You&#039;ve been missed!  Hope you&#039;re doing well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back Dulimergirl,   You&#8217;ve been missed!  Hope you&#8217;re doing well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

