« | »

New York Post Calls Sarah Palin A ‘MILF’

We were tempted to let this pass.

But it really is pretty outrageous — even for the New York Post:

HASSELBECK FOR PALIN

‘VIEW’ CO-HOST JOINS CAMPAIGN

Post Staff Writer

October 23, 2008

Got Milf?

Right leaning “View” co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck is hitting the stump for Gov. Sarah Palin, starting this Sunday in Florida.

“The View” co-host said Thursday the McCain campaign contacted her on Wednesday — the same day she feuded with co-host Joy Behar — over politics and asked her to introduce Palin at rallies.

“I am more than honored to be there [in Florida for Palin], so I will be flying there to travel with her and meet some pretty interesting people, I have a feeling,” Hasselbeck said today on the air. “That’s an honor, I’m excited to do it, and I’ll have some stories I’m sure on Monday.”

The move comes as the McCain-Palin campaign seeks to boost its support among female voters, especially working moms. Despite early indications that Palin’s selection would help attract women and former supporters of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, polls suggest the strategy hasn’t worked…

For those of you (like ourselves) who might not be acquainted with the term it is an acronym for the popular vulgarity:  “mother I would like to f***.”

It would appear that “Got Milf?” refers to both Governor Palin and Elizabeth Hasselbeck.

If this had been printed in any mainstream newspaper about Hillary Clinton — indeed any Democrat woman — the cries of sexism would be deafening.

But, alas, Governor Palin is fair game from all sides.

(Thanks to Artpa for the heads up.)

This article was posted by Steve on Friday, October 24th, 2008. Comments are currently closed.

24 Responses to “New York Post Calls Sarah Palin A ‘MILF’”

  1. Reality Bytes says:

    To be honest, SG, I don’t think anyone is gonna call Hillary a MILF. Now a WIRTASPMEO sure, but not MILF.

    (WIRTASPMEO): “Woman I Rather Take A Stick & Poke My Eye Out” Pronounced – Wir-tas-pa-MEo

  2. Kilmeny says:

    Ah, the NY Post (Motto: “Fuggeddabouddit”). They’re a hoot, they are. However, I’m pretty certain it’s a compliment Governor Palin could well do without. Wonder what, if anything, radical feminists would have to say about this.

  3. realgone says:

    Fact check: They are both MILFs.

  4. BannedbytheTaliban says:

    Some are going a bit further:

    Palin Look-A-Like Strippers Vie For Title

    LAS VEGAS — There has been no shortage of Sarah Palin imitators since the Alaskan governor became Sen. John McCain’s vice presidential candidate.

    But Thursday night brought a new twist for Palin look-a-likes.

    Tina Fey is enjoying new-found celebrity status playing Palin on Saturday Night Live. What’s good for Fey is also good for dancers at Club Paradise Gentlemen’s Club.

    http://www.fox5vegas.com/news/17792389/detail.html

    Shameful.

  5. 1sttofight says:

    FWIW, It is a fact that Republican women are better looking than Democrat women.

    Can you imagine Hillary , Allbright,Helen Thomas, etc on a stripper pole?

    Gouge my eyes out with a stick.

  6. Icarus says:

    This world is messed up big time!!!

    This is the kind of crap I hear and see every day. A sex obsessed culture!!!!
    Every second Ad … Buy Viagra. What happened to good old Grandparents that spent their time on their children and grandchildren.
    “No time Kids… Me and grand-ma need our fix!”!!!

    Sad culture!

    Anecdote…

    My 10 year-old has been bugging me to take her to a local haunted house walk-through. …against my advice – we all (family) went.

    A great deal of the children who were waiting in line with parents (or adult chaperons) were around 10 … a few younger ones were also in tow. While waiting to enter the ghoul-hosts entertained everyone with a great deal of “sexual innuendo” type slapstick, as a way to keep everyone entertained. Nothing outright rude; but enough to make you shake your head and wonder… with many children in this line waiting to go and have some Halloween fun; what are they thinking? Of course there were many adults (Libs) who joined in the fun.

    Subsequently one of the ghoul ushers started to mention (ridicule) Sarah Palin. I was tempted to say something, but again he never went far enough to where I would definitely be compelled to interject. Plus, it was apparent that I was way outnumbered by Libs 10 to 1.

    But my daughter did look up at me with those “you were right dad` eyes.

    We finally went in… and it was all gore. No classics like Werewolf, Frankenstein, Witches, Dracula, Mummies, etc, etc. Nope, it was just Texas-Chain-Saw, Freddy-K, Saw, Jason, Blood & guts, and so forth. My daughter was immediately horrified; asked me to pick her up, pushed her face into my jacket and never once looked out for a peek. We were 5 so it was quicker to hurry through rather than go back out.
    Outside I asked my daughter… so you want to come out again next year?
    She said “no”! …” maybe when I’m a teenager” lol

    Well at least I have a few more years to fight this indoctrination!

    God help us!

  7. Reality Bytes says:

    1sto – DID YOU HAVE TO GO THERE?!

    Actually, liberals like Senator Clinton are more like WWWFYWMT

    “Women Who Will F*.* You With Higher Taxes”

  8. Sooie says:

    They don’t get less offensive as time goes by, do they? Thanks to SL for clarifying that (disgusting) term.

    Let’s survey, for a moment, the obvious differences between conservative and liberal women:
    http://tinyurl.com/5dv85f

  9. GuppyNblue says:

    Kilmeny
    “Wonder what, if anything, radical feminists would have to say about this”.

    Or to Larry Flynt making a pornographic film with a Palin Look-alike. Wasn’t porn supposed to be the ultimate degradation of women? I see the Fem-Nazis as just another commie tool meant to sabotage our (previously moral) culture. They have no real conviction if it doesn’t first achieve that.

  10. wardmama4 says:

    I am truly at a loss for words – and 1st – I (as a woman) do not appreciate my lunch being ruined with even the flash image your words invoked.

    Standards my man – there must be decency standards. Although the woman you mentioned probably dream at night of being even somewhat close to the body type necessary for such a ‘profession’.

  11. Consilience says:

    The coarsening of our culture can has but one remedy—put the flesh peddlers out of business. Ostracize sympathisers. Where I grew up, a man who engaged in this coarse vulgarism would be marginalized—and probably whipped within a inch of his life (if he were that lucky).

  12. Liberals Demise says:

    NOT 1 DEMOCRAP WOMAN(transgender) is good enough to be considered MILF material. I do believe Hillary is one of the better sex change operations thus far. Nancy follows a close second!!

  13. Colonel1961 says:

    Yes, I’m tired of the coarsening of our culture, but I’d still ‘discuss a demand curve’ with either of the ladies pictured…

  14. Edwards_wants_me_to_move says:

    Guys, I really don’t think this is that big of a deal. This term was originated in American Pie when I was 17. The Anacronym spelled out is obscene, but I think the overall meaning has evolved and shouldn’t be taken so offensively. My friends and I use the term a lot just to refer to an older woman or a woman with child(ren) who is attractive. In fact, I don’t remember, but I probably have referred to her with that term. I didn’t read the article so I don’t know if they used the term in a belittling way. I think Sarah Palin is beautiful and wouldn’t say that about her to undercut her. It’s just a perk of a McCain Presidency.

  15. wardmama4 says:

    And EWMTM – that is exactly our point. Just as Clinton’s -‘It all depends on the definition of what is is.’ – As soon as the step is taken into vulgar, the easier it becomes, the more the younger generation grows up believing it is ok and the further into vulgar each successive generation goes – because the meaning ‘evolves’ and ‘it’s just words’ crappola.

    I come from people who mean what they say and say what they mean. And their words were as good as a signature. Look at our culture now – words mean whatever the heck you want them to, ‘everybody’ lies and contracts are meaningless –

    I for one don’t want America to become a degenerate anarchy of Roman rivaling amoral excesses. And neither should any other American.

  16. Colonel1961 says:

    wardmama4: our excesses and amorality have exceeded anything Rome ever imagined – with few possible exceptions.

    Goldsmith’s ‘The Roman History’ would be an eye-opener for you. Difficult reading (a lot of archaic diphthongs) but enlightening…

  17. Reality Bytes says:

    LILIPAFL

    Pronounced (lil-e-PAF-l)

    LIBERALS I’D LIKE TO INDICT & PUT AWAY FOR LIFE

  18. DEZ says:

    LILTS.
    Liberals I’d like to shoot.

  19. sheehanjihad says:

    CTSSISAFD! (Cindy the Snag Sheehan is still a freaking douchebag”)

    It’s kind of a compliment really, the democrat shrivel bags are so envious of Palin or they wouldnt really go out of their way to try to demean her. I tried to think about which liberal leftist or democrat female that would qualify as a “milf”….there arent any.

    Being called a milf is supposedly insulting….but the women in the democrat party and leftist circles would more be called MNWFEBC….

    pronounced “min-weffe-bicks” or,” mothers nobody would f**k except bill clinton.” Bitter old snags jealous of a forty something babe with the ability to make them look like the shriveled up shrews they are.

  20. Reality Bytes says:

    UGLES

    Pronounced: (UG-lees)

    Ugly Gal Liberals Exclaiming Socialism

    FUGLES

    Pronounced: (FUG-lees)

    Freakin’ Ugly Gal Liberals Exclaiming Socialism

  21. joeblough says:

    All the real hotties in politics are on the conservative side.

    So we can expect more of this sort of insult as conservative women become more visible, aggressive and successful. And as more and more people perceive that these are our smartest, prettiest and most likable women.

    There’s no way that the coyote-ugly harridans of the liberal camp are going to let this pass unchallenged.

    And it’s worth remembering that in many people, who might otherwise be rather plain looking, beauty radiates outward from within. Sometimes good looks are skin deep, and sometimes not.

    I don’t think that it’s any sort of accident that there are more good looking women, especially good looking proffessional/public women, on our side.

    The good, the true and the beautiful. Remember them?

    The other side will hate us all the more for it – because they hate the good, the true and the beautiful.

    Are there plain, or even homely girls in our camp? Sure. We’re human!

    But ugly, envious, malicious and spiritually twisted women are a core constituency for the left.

    Sooner or later we’ve got to win. We’re holding all the trumps.

  22. joeblough says:

    I will add that the addition of feminine emotionality and womanly passion is going to do a world of wonder for the conservative camp.

    The more public it is, the better.

    If we’re ever going to take this women’s suffrage thing seriously and use it to our benefit, we better bring in the experts and put them right out front.

    Our Coulters and Palins and everyone in between are going to bring a huge revival to Americanism.

    They’ve got that special something.

  23. 1sttofight says:

    I fell in love with a smart good looking woman 33 years ago and have never regretted it.
    Through thick or thin we have stuck together, sometimes just barely but we always figured out a way to make it succeed.
    Key word is WE.
    Her name is Mrs. 1st.

  24. Liberals Demise says:

    OUTSTANDING!!! Get some Mr. 1st !


« Front Page | To Top
« | »