"The difference is that instead of dirt and poison, we have rather chosen to fill our hives with honey and wax, thus furnishing mankind with the two noblest of things, which are Sweetness and Light." - Jonathan Swift

« Reuters: NATO Raids Kill 50 Afghan “Civilians” | Home | Pelosi #4 Most Beautiful Person On Capitol Hill »

NY Times Editorials - From Just The Last 10 Days

From the "Newspaper Of Record," the New York Times:

EDITORIAL; Seeking the Truth About Pat Tillman

Representative Henry A. Waxman should continue his quest to get to the bottom of the convoluted and troubling case of Cpl. Pat Tillman’s death.

July 27, 2007 Opinion Editorial

EDITORIAL; Fixing the Scam on Collect Calls

No families should have to choose between putting food on the table or accepting a collect call from a loved one behind bars.

July 27, 2007 Opinion Editorial

EDITORIAL; The Wounds Outlast the War

A public increasingly jaded about the damages from the Iraq war should demand the commander in chief face up to the sufferings of his returning troops.

July 26, 2007 Opinion Editorial

EDITORIAL; Defying the Imperial Presidency

Congress must not capitulate in the White House’s attempt to rob it of its constitutional powers.

July 26, 2007 Opinion Editorial

EDITORIAL; No Exit Strategy

With a veto-proof majority, Congress will have to tell President Bush that prolonging the Iraq war for another two years will not bring victory.

July 25, 2007 Opinion Editorial

EDITORIAL OBSERVER; YouDebate: If Only the Candidates Were as Interesting as the Questioners

The New York Times is nothing if not relentless.

Mind you, these are just the bouquets to America from their editorial pages.

Their "news" articles are even more biased - and ruthlessly destructive.

Related Articles:

  Print Email

16 Responses to “NY Times Editorials - From Just The Last 10 Days”

  1. Media_man

    I use to buy the Sunday NY Times faithfully, but stopped a few years ago. They don’t even pretend to be objective anymore. They might as well have a donkey logo underneath its motto. Howard Dean or that Daily KOS guy could be their editor.

  2. SG

    And what a laff that there has finally been a development in the Middle East that the NY Times can applaud:

    EDITORIAL; Democracy Affirmed

    The impressive re-election victory scored by Turkey’s conservative Muslim ruling party is a tribute to the growing maturity of that country’s politics and an inspiration for the cause of democracy in the broader Muslim world.

    Is it ignorance or just a death wish for the West?

  3. wirenut

    At least the slimes is being somewhat truthful , they want this country to no longer exist as we know it .
    That is ,if by telling lies about what your against , then your telling the truth about what your for . I’m I even close?

  4. wardmama4

    SG - you picked the one that to me so examplifies the utter lunacy of the American left right now - how anyone can use conservative, Muslim and the phrase ‘an inspiration for the cause of democracy’ in the same sentence of an op-ed and be taken seriously by anyone over the age of 16 is beyond me.

    These peoples full intent is to destroy America from within - it is just a shame that too many people are believing their drivel and ignoring their election fraud to keep getting elected.

  5. Jonas Parker

    This used to be an excellent newspaper back in the day… now they’re best noted for the Sunday crossword puzzle…

  6. PC

    A few days ago, I was reading an article in the Metro Section about changing a zip code on the Upper East Side. Here is what the author said:

    “On July 1, they [Upper East Side residents] found themselves cast out of Eden and into new Zip codes decidely lacking in cachet. The 10021 code, which had covered East 61st Street to East 80th, between Fifth Avenue and the East River, was divided into three parts. Just as Iraq might be some day, come to think of it. Hardly an encouraging thought, is it?”

  7. doingwhatican

    NYT Reporter John F. Burns on the Charlie Rose Show, July 17, 2007….

    “I think, quite simply that the United States armed forces here — and I find this to be very widely agreed amongst Iraqis that I know, of all ethnic and sectarian backgrounds — the United States armed forces are a very important inhibitor against violence. I know it`s argued by some people that they provoke the violence. I simply don`t believe that to be in the main true. I think it`s a much larger truth that where American forces are present, they are inhibiting sectarian violence, and they are going after the people, particularly al-Qaeda and the Shiite death squads, who are provoking that violence. Remove them or at least remove them quickly, and it seems to me — controversial as this may seem to be saying in the present circumstances, while I know there`s this agonizing debate going on in the United States about this — that you have to weigh the price. And the price would very likely be very, very high levels of violence, at least in the short run and perhaps, perhaps - perhaps for quite a considerable period of time.”

    John F. Burns is the only voice of reason at the NYT.

  8. Phil Byler

    I subscribed to the New York Times for 20 years, but cancelled because I just could not justify putting money into the hands of a bunch of socialist, elitist traitors and the Times never publishes any letter to the editor that calls makes it clear how dreadfully wrong they are. I realize that John Burns is a throwback to another era when the New York Times was a quality newspaper, but there are other ways to read Burns. What would be good for America is for the New York Times to be prosecuted successfully for treason.

  9. Zeusshiloh

    And the Times wonder why they are loosing subscribers (and money?)

  10. DEZ

    “Americans want President Bush to explain how he will extract the troops and contain the bloodletting and chaos the war has unleashed.”

    OK, I am having a hard time here, Just how the hell do we withdraw our troops and keep bloodthirsty savages from killing each other at the same time.
    The New York times wants us to police Iraq without a police presence.
    Hey, lets apply the same logic to Dufar.

    Sorry I only picked on this editorial, But the stupidity of the logic just screams MORONS.
    OK, I should expect what from the Slimes?

  11. eagle man

    NYT has gone so far left in the last two decades that it’s never right. JP nailed it when noting its sole remaining draw for most of us is the sunday crossword puzzle. Why the Federal Election Commission hasn’t compelled this compromised fishwrap to register as a donk lobbying org is another puzzle.

  12. 1sttofight

    I am not so sure that the NYT has moved further left as much as in the last few years their lies have been exposed more because of the net.
    They can’t get away with the same stuff now that they used to be able too.

  13. Old Grouch

    Queen Hillary will impose the unFairness Doctrine at her first opportunity. That might take out talk radio. Shutting down the Internet could take a lot longer. The Slimes would certainly support censorship, they don’t want their lies and incompetence exposed. The ‘net is the most powerful tool of the truth, so closing it down will be a top priority. Every totalitarian regime has to control information. Can’t have the truth setting anyone free.

  14. SG

    “I am not so sure that the NYT has moved further left as much as in the last few years their lies have been exposed more because of the net.”

    I think The Times has moved quite radically left.

    During Vietnam it was against the war, of course, and fairly left of center in most things.

    But it shifted much further left when its former editor Abe Rosenthal left in 1988:

    A. M. Rosenthal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._M._Rosenthal

    He hung on as a columnist and still has some clout. But once he left for good and all in 1999 The Times went hard left (and very gay).

  15. 1sttofight

    What I meant was there was not much room for them to move left more. They have been pretty much as far left as they could go for some time.
    What is different now is they have moved into the openly treasonous arena and no one in the Gov. seems to care enough to do anything about it.

  16. SG

    “What I meant was there was not much room for them to move left more. They have been pretty much as far left as they could go for some time.”

    I wasn’t sure of your time frame. But the aforementioned Abe Rosenthal endorsed Reagan, for instance.

    And he was even for the invasion of Iraq.

    But since he has been gone there are no more grownups over there. Just (gay) children.


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« Reuters: NATO Raids Kill 50 Afghan “Civilians” | Pelosi #4 Most Beautiful Person On Capitol Hill »