Comments on: NYT: Chi-Coms Are ‘Greener’ Than US

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:39:20 +0000

Now………where do you suppose they got the technology from or the idea?

By: canary

canary — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:10:37 +0000

oohh. That may be Obama’s desert retreat and hide-out after he shafts America. The sand is his element. A little grass for doggie walks.

By: canary

canary — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:26:14 +0000

So, how much fuel does a helicopter to use to get to the desert home. Kind of like the little girls in the Olympics.
Strange at the beginning of the administration, Hillary was over there chewing China out to become green, and now they are ahead of the world.
Baby formula that kills,
Mercury light bulb factories are sickening and killing the workers.
Lead paint in the toys they send us.

By: RightWinger

RightWinger — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:31:01 +0000

The NY Times continuing to prove what “useful idiots” they are. The Chinese know full well that Obama is leading this country into a black hole and that Cap-n-Trade will destroy us from within. Naturally the Chinese spread this rubbish around about the giant wind projects because our State Media will run with it like the gospel. Now the militant environmentalists can point to the Slimes artical and spin away the argument that China and India have no intentions of going “green” to save the planet from the global warming hoax.

How soon will Chavez be proclaming that Venezuela is going green to help save the world?

By: tranquil.night

tranquil.night — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:28:38 +0000

This report bugs me more than usual. The US is and always has been a leader in green technology. We invented it and continue to innovate upon it in the public and private sectors.

My father just retired after 40 years in the wastewater industry, which is a publicly run sector. He managed a major plant down here in SoCal and saw to the development, construction, and completion of a waste-to-energy system. The plant is now powered on its own with watts to spare and sell to the community, and it generates its own profitable fertilizer rather than simply dumping the output into the ocean.

This plan was over a decade in the making; in water/wastewater there has always concern for the environment and energy, the project did use public money, but this was before any edict for efficiency or clean demands. It was a matter simply based on a desire to improve upon an established system and make life better for one’s fellow mankind.

Little to no government control over the issue needed. The project was done cheaply, buffed local business and opened a new market. It was done with respect to the left’s desire for cleaner environmental procedures for wastewater treatment and it was done with fiscal responsibility and innovation. And, most importantly, it was done when it didn’t even had to be.

By: proreason

proreason — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:27:54 +0000

“HSBC predicts that China will invest more money in renewable energy and nuclear power ”

Probably true.

$1,000,000 to renewable.

$100,000,000,000 to nuclear.