<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT Claims GOP Rethinking Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144609</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144609</guid>
		<description>Well, bestiality, free-farting, military veterans and unaborted pregnancies are still verboten, but child molestors are about to get the protection they have suffered so long without.  From the always informative and entertaining American Thinker:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/04/protecting_pedophiles.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, bestiality, free-farting, military veterans and unaborted pregnancies are still verboten, but child molestors are about to get the protection they have suffered so long without.  From the always informative and entertaining American Thinker:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/04/protecting_pedophiles.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com.....hiles.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144419</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144419</guid>
		<description>&quot;where is PETA&quot;

We should publish you and ArtBoy as a long and short powerpack.....he does the long parts.....you do the one-liners for change of pace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;where is PETA&#8221;</p>
<p>We should publish you and ArtBoy as a long and short powerpack&#8230;..he does the long parts&#8230;..you do the one-liners for change of pace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144414</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144414</guid>
		<description>Is Barney still running gerbil races? If so....where is PETA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Barney still running gerbil races? If so&#8230;.where is PETA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144410</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144410</guid>
		<description>.....&quot;legalize beastiality....&quot;

Does Barney have swine flu?  Is that how its contracted?  Who knew?  Maybe if we put a little &quot;oinkment&quot; on poor Barney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..&#8221;legalize beastiality&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does Barney have swine flu?  Is that how its contracted?  Who knew?  Maybe if we put a little &#8220;oinkment&#8221; on poor Barney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144405</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144405</guid>
		<description>Now that we&#039;re on a path to15% unemployment and since the Swine Flu is poised to overtake the Black Death as the killer of record, it&#039;s a good time to legalize beastiality.

Makes sense, doesn&#039;t it?

Drooling Barney should be pleased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we&#8217;re on a path to15% unemployment and since the Swine Flu is poised to overtake the Black Death as the killer of record, it&#8217;s a good time to legalize beastiality.</p>
<p>Makes sense, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Drooling Barney should be pleased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdsand</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144400</link>
		<dc:creator>pdsand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144400</guid>
		<description>I was going to comment, but you said it best Steve.  This man failed to mobilize the conservative base to oppose the biggest socialist to ever roll down the pike.  How does that give him credentials to tell the GOP what it needs to do to win?
And of course, they mention several times that currently the GOP is not exactly banging the drums on gay marriage and that unless something happens over time the issue will fade to obscurity.  Isn&#039;t that the case for any issue?  If one party enthusiastically supports gay marriage, and the other lets it go by the wayside, then of course over time the issue will fade to obscurity.  Because after 3-10 years, gay marriage will be the law in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to comment, but you said it best Steve.  This man failed to mobilize the conservative base to oppose the biggest socialist to ever roll down the pike.  How does that give him credentials to tell the GOP what it needs to do to win?<br />
And of course, they mention several times that currently the GOP is not exactly banging the drums on gay marriage and that unless something happens over time the issue will fade to obscurity.  Isn&#8217;t that the case for any issue?  If one party enthusiastically supports gay marriage, and the other lets it go by the wayside, then of course over time the issue will fade to obscurity.  Because after 3-10 years, gay marriage will be the law in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144389</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144389</guid>
		<description>This whole gay thing is an overrated fad. Isn&#039;t it ironic that Obama&#039;s Islamo buds would hang them as lamp post decorations if they had their way. If ever there was a populist cause that makes &quot;strange bedfellows&quot; this one would be it. In more  ways than I care to imagine for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole gay thing is an overrated fad. Isn&#8217;t it ironic that Obama&#8217;s Islamo buds would hang them as lamp post decorations if they had their way. If ever there was a populist cause that makes &#8220;strange bedfellows&#8221; this one would be it. In more  ways than I care to imagine for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heykev</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144360</link>
		<dc:creator>heykev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144360</guid>
		<description>I am just concerned that once we have &quot;accepted&quot; this prevision and had it forced upon us by judicial fiat, what&#039;s next? Polygamists and NABLA will both demanding their rights. Given recent courts ruling, I do not see any reason why these groups could not get themselves approved. 

God help us when Berry starts appointing members to any court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just concerned that once we have &#8220;accepted&#8221; this prevision and had it forced upon us by judicial fiat, what&#8217;s next? Polygamists and NABLA will both demanding their rights. Given recent courts ruling, I do not see any reason why these groups could not get themselves approved. </p>
<p>God help us when Berry starts appointing members to any court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymoose</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144330</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144330</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s telling there hasn&#039;t been one state where the decision has been made by popular vote, it&#039;s all been by court decisions or lawsuits.  I also use to think the whole concept of a gay &quot;marriage&quot; would never be taken seriously, but it has been.  (After all, a marriage has a husband and a wife, not two husbands or two wives, but never mind.)

I feel that as long as the Dems are in charge they&#039;ll keep churning it out and every legislative fiat will be another &quot;victory&quot; for open mindedness and acceptance and blah blah. 

Two things I expect will happen. One is as the gays start getting married they&#039;ll find it doesn&#039;t make everyone start approving of them and the world doesn&#039;t turn end over end.  They can demand and pass laws and make it a hate crime to say anything they don&#039;t want to hear, but people in the end will stay the same.

The other is the whole Rainbow Coalition exists because of a common &quot;the enemy of my enemy is my friend,&quot; and gays have been portrayed in the best light possible by the media.  What do gay men and lesbian women really have in common?  And for screaming they&#039;re hard wired this way what about bisexuals?  The real ugliness will begin when they start fighting with each other, not with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s telling there hasn&#8217;t been one state where the decision has been made by popular vote, it&#8217;s all been by court decisions or lawsuits.  I also use to think the whole concept of a gay &#8220;marriage&#8221; would never be taken seriously, but it has been.  (After all, a marriage has a husband and a wife, not two husbands or two wives, but never mind.)</p>
<p>I feel that as long as the Dems are in charge they&#8217;ll keep churning it out and every legislative fiat will be another &#8220;victory&#8221; for open mindedness and acceptance and blah blah. </p>
<p>Two things I expect will happen. One is as the gays start getting married they&#8217;ll find it doesn&#8217;t make everyone start approving of them and the world doesn&#8217;t turn end over end.  They can demand and pass laws and make it a hate crime to say anything they don&#8217;t want to hear, but people in the end will stay the same.</p>
<p>The other is the whole Rainbow Coalition exists because of a common &#8220;the enemy of my enemy is my friend,&#8221; and gays have been portrayed in the best light possible by the media.  What do gay men and lesbian women really have in common?  And for screaming they&#8217;re hard wired this way what about bisexuals?  The real ugliness will begin when they start fighting with each other, not with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wirenut</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144326</link>
		<dc:creator>wirenut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144326</guid>
		<description>Every time you hear the word consensus, expect an agenda instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time you hear the word consensus, expect an agenda instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144325</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144325</guid>
		<description>EGADS.....what&#039;s next? 
Are they hinting that Barney Fwank wants to switch hit parties?
Is the NYT forcing homos on the GOP?
Is Hillary really a man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EGADS&#8230;..what&#8217;s next?<br />
Are they hinting that Barney Fwank wants to switch hit parties?<br />
Is the NYT forcing homos on the GOP?<br />
Is Hillary really a man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144323</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144323</guid>
		<description>.....&quot;The fact that a run of states have legalized gay marriage in recent months — either by court decision or by legislative action —.....&quot;

ONE state by legislative action, the rest by judicial dictat.  How does judicial activism (mostly from Clinton-appointed judges) reflect the attitudes, much less the will, of the people?  And did somebody forget what just took place in California?  Proposition 8 comes to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..&#8221;The fact that a run of states have legalized gay marriage in recent months — either by court decision or by legislative action —&#8230;..&#8221;</p>
<p>ONE state by legislative action, the rest by judicial dictat.  How does judicial activism (mostly from Clinton-appointed judges) reflect the attitudes, much less the will, of the people?  And did somebody forget what just took place in California?  Proposition 8 comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catie</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144322</link>
		<dc:creator>catie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144322</guid>
		<description>RW, they replaced an excellent show (the Chris Plante Show) here in DC with that a$$hat and his clown car sidekick.  I don&#039;t know where you live (you may be in this area as well) but I haven&#039;t listened to him since he came on.
Steve Schmidt was at the Log Cabin Republican soiree a few weekends ago along  with Megan McCain.  So this isn&#039;t surprising at all.
I believe that&#039;s Gulianni in that picture but it could just as easily be Barney Frank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RW, they replaced an excellent show (the Chris Plante Show) here in DC with that a$$hat and his clown car sidekick.  I don&#8217;t know where you live (you may be in this area as well) but I haven&#8217;t listened to him since he came on.<br />
Steve Schmidt was at the Log Cabin Republican soiree a few weekends ago along  with Megan McCain.  So this isn&#8217;t surprising at all.<br />
I believe that&#8217;s Gulianni in that picture but it could just as easily be Barney Frank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gila Monster</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144317</link>
		<dc:creator>Gila Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144317</guid>
		<description>Given their current political proclivity, it&#039;s obviously time for the Slimes to change their long-held banner to something more appropriate to reflecting their content.
I was thinking &quot;The New York Liberal Pravda&quot;.  All the news that&#039;s fit to proselytize...
Yeah, I&#039;m thinking that&#039;s about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given their current political proclivity, it&#8217;s obviously time for the Slimes to change their long-held banner to something more appropriate to reflecting their content.<br />
I was thinking &#8220;The New York Liberal Pravda&#8221;.  All the news that&#8217;s fit to proselytize&#8230;<br />
Yeah, I&#8217;m thinking that&#8217;s about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinger</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144315</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144315</guid>
		<description>I heard Joe Scarborough going on a rant on the radio today crying that if the GOP wants to preach for Govt to stay out of our lives,  then we are not supposed to be hypocrites and say we need the Fed Govt to not interfere with the people&#039;s decision to allow gay marriage.

We might just as well get it over with now and change the name of the US to &quot;Thunderdome&quot; and just say anything goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard Joe Scarborough going on a rant on the radio today crying that if the GOP wants to preach for Govt to stay out of our lives,  then we are not supposed to be hypocrites and say we need the Fed Govt to not interfere with the people&#8217;s decision to allow gay marriage.</p>
<p>We might just as well get it over with now and change the name of the US to &#8220;Thunderdome&#8221; and just say anything goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144311</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-claims-gop-rethinking-gay-marriage#comment-144311</guid>
		<description>Hey Arlen! You forgot to take Pawlenty with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Arlen! You forgot to take Pawlenty with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

