Comments on: NYT Poll: Obama Ineffective On Economy

By: BatK

BatK — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:40:45 +0000

I tried quoting it, but the whole clip is hilarious and hits a bit too close to home with the direction our president wants to take this country… for those who like the Monty Python boys, you will enjoy… if you substitute “lady of the lake” with “MSM” it all flows rather smashingly

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOOTKA0aGI0

By: MinnesotaRush

MinnesotaRush — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:27:58 +0000

“A substantial majority of Americans say President Obama has not developed a strategy to deal with the budget deficit, …”

No, JEFF ZELENY and DALIA SUSSMAN, … I don’t think that’s what a substantial majority of Americans are saying at all!!!

I think a substantial majority of Americans are saying this guy is an absolutely incompetent and incapable BOOB (to put it nicely). He’s a criminal (can’t even follow the laws he helped write) and a domestic terrorist ..a Trojan Horse!

Try not to forget .. your boy, o-blah-blah, NEVER had the substantial majority of Americans in his corner like you nimrods. Of ALL eligible voters .. your o-blah-blah only got a little more than 33% of the vote. Of people who voted ,, he got 50 some %. Try to put it into some more honest context you two.

For chuckles and an UNBIASED viewpoint, why don’t you ask the “substantial majority ” of S&L’rs say about this presidential fraud, o-blah-blah.

By: proreason

proreason — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:49:28 +0000

How did this get published.

Heads will roll at the Slimes.

They must figure short-attention span liberals will never get past the 63% “approval”.

By: tranquil.night

tranquil.night — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:23:59 +0000

Wouldn’t give the Times or others too much credit. As seen with Reuters, the libs can’t put the same level of spin without looking completely idiotic. There’s too many sources countering their lies so they can only hope to put the brightest perspective on the smallest grade of truth. We know this underscores a much more serious reality than they’ll ever admit!

By: bronzeprofessor

bronzeprofessor — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:20:15 +0000

If you look more closely at the composition of people who responded to the NY Times poll, you will notice something very fishy — 48% of the people responding voted for Obama, and 25% voted for McCain. With a biased sampling like that, you have to look at a 63% approval as something closer to Rasmussen and Zogby’s figures, both of which find the approval in the mid or low 50s. Zogby is good because he gives respondents four categories — excellent, good, fair, and poor — and then he counts excellent and good as supportive responses, and the other two as less so. The Zogby polls I have read usually have Obama breaking about even.

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:09:00 +0000

They need a transfusion of funds to keep their jobs so they probably decided to print some truth and see if anyone buys it. The other way certainly sucked!!