LMAO

but you know, I happened to be looking at tax credits today, on the off chance that some might apply to me (ha ha). It turns out that in my state some new homeowners can get a $2,000 tax CREDIT if their income is below a threshold. And they can still deduct interest above 2,000.

So UNKA SUGA is giving away $2000 a year IN ADDITION to Barney Fife’s little scheme to bankrupt the country so he can feel better about being a drooling pervert.

Why don’t they just build a sewer line direct from our wallets to the hood?

As for the STIMULAS PACT………I ain’t STIMULATED about it. For that matter, I’m not even slightly aroused.

The purpose is to buy votes. The liberal strategy is to entrench themselves in power forever.

The fact that some welfare helps people over rough patches in their lives is a byproduct. If liberals could buy votes with a cheaper devise, they would. That’s why they came up with hopey-changey. That’s free and in some ways more powerful.

We lived on $300/month – half of which was our rent. We made it – and never looked back, nor was homeless, nor starved to death – we tightened our belts and hung in that short period of time.

My d-i-l used welfare appropriately when her family kicked her out at 17 – she finished high school, raised her son, went to college and got a Bachelor and a Masters – and got off of welfare, as fast as possible. And now lives better than I do.

I think that the double whammy of welfare and Social Security have led too many people to rely on and believe that Uncle Sugar will pay their bills. The indoctrination works and this is what we get – a massive trillion dollar spending bill being shoved down our throats by a pathetic, inexperienced thug politician.

Why is that? Do people actually want to withhold food from people who genuinely need assistance?

Or perhaps people on welfare roles who can afford $200 sneakers are contributing to additional scrutiny.

On an unrelated topic, wouldn’t it be interesting to see the extent of tax-free income income in this country for transactions like drugs, prostitution, theft, scams, insurance fraud, illegal gambling, and transactions in the non-criminal underground economy? I’m reminded of the famous experiment years ago where a bus accident was staged with nobody on the bus, yet when the police arrived, 19 injured passengers had mysteriously appeared.

And of course, we haven’t even touched on lotteries and the myriad uses of food-stamps.

Under the benevolent oversight of Obamy, the need for those sorts of things should quickly disappear.

Uh, excuse me? Den why izzit sumpin’ you be administratin’, Miz welfare administrator Carlson?

If so, we would think The Times would feature them on their front page above the fold for almost as many weeks at their love fest over Abu Ghraib.”

I don’t think they would do that because Chairman nObama is in the White House. I don’t think the love affair will wilt enough this early to risk associating images like that with his dictatorship Presidency.

Now if Bush was still in the White House, then those images would be Front Page propoganda like you mentioned above.