« | »

NYT: The New Poor – Long Term Jobless

From a suddenly noticing New York Times:

The New Poor – Millions of Unemployed Face Years Without Jobs


February 21, 2010

BUENA PARK, Calif. — Even as the American economy shows tentative signs of a rebound, the human toll of the recession continues to mount, with millions of Americans remaining out of work, out of savings and nearing the end of their unemployment benefits.

Economists fear that the nascent recovery will leave more people behind than in past recessions, failing to create jobs in sufficient numbers to absorb the record-setting ranks of the long-term unemployed.

Call them the new poor: people long accustomed to the comforts of middle-class life who are now relying on public assistance for the first time in their lives — potentially for years to come.

Yet the social safety net is already showing severe strains. Roughly 2.7 million jobless people will lose their unemployment check before the end of April unless Congress approves the Obama administration’s proposal to extend the payments, according to the Labor Department.

Here in Southern California, Jean Eisen has been without work since she lost her job selling beauty salon equipment more than two years ago. In the several months she has endured with neither a paycheck nor an unemployment check, she has relied on local food banks for her groceries.

She has learned to live without the prescription medications she is supposed to take for high blood pressure and cholesterol. She has become effusively religious — an unexpected turn for this onetime standup comic with X-rated material — finding in Christianity her only form of health insurance.

“I pray for healing,” says Ms. Eisen, 57. “When you’ve got nothing, you’ve got to go with what you know.”

Warm, outgoing and prone to the positive, Ms. Eisen has worked much of her life. Now, she is one of 6.3 million Americans who have been unemployed for six months or longer, the largest number since the government began keeping track in 1948. That is more than double the toll in the next-worst period, in the early 1980s.

Men have suffered the largest numbers of job losses in this recession. But Ms. Eisen has the unfortunate distinction of being among a group — women from 45 to 64 years of age — whose long-term unemployment rate has grown rapidly.

In 1983, after a deep recession, women in that range made up only 7 percent of those who had been out of work for six months or longer, according to the Labor Department. Last year, they made up 14 percent.

Twice, Ms. Eisen exhausted her unemployment benefits before her check was restored by a federal extension. Last week, her check ran out again. She and her husband now settle their bills with only his $1,595 monthly disability check. The rent on their apartment is $1,380.

“We’re looking at the very real possibility of being homeless,” she said.

Every downturn pushes some people out of the middle class before the economy resumes expanding. Most recover. Many prosper. But some economists worry that this time could be different. An unusual constellation of forces — some embedded in the modern-day economy, others unique to this wrenching recession — might make it especially difficult for those out of work to find their way back to their middle-class lives.

Labor experts say the economy needs 100,000 new jobs a month just to absorb entrants to the labor force. With more than 15 million people officially jobless, even a vigorous recovery is likely to leave an enormous number out of work for years.

Some labor experts note that severe economic downturns are generally followed by powerful expansions, suggesting that aggressive hiring will soon resume. But doubts remain about whether such hiring can last long enough to absorb anywhere close to the millions of unemployed.

Some labor experts say the basic functioning of the American economy has changed in ways that make jobs scarce — particularly for older, less-educated people like Ms. Eisen, who has only a high school diploma.

Large companies are increasingly owned by institutional investors who crave swift profits, a feat often achieved by cutting payroll. The declining influence of unions has made it easier for employers to shift work to part-time and temporary employees. Factory work and even white-collar jobs have moved in recent years to low-cost countries in Asia and Latin America. Automation has helped manufacturing cut 5.6 million jobs since 2000 — the sort of jobs that once provided lower-skilled workers with middle-class paychecks…

And it goes on and on predictably from there.

Needless to say, the New York Times is telling us that we have to face this new standard. The new normal.

That we can’t expect to have the employment numbers we have had in the past. This is the new reality.

And, secretly, of course, The Times is thrilled. They hope to roll back the piddling welfare reforms of the 1990s, and eventually add still more social safety net ‘benefits.’

Getting more people dependent on the government is almost as important to them as advancing the homosexual agenda.

For instance, it would never occur to the Solons at The Times that illegal aliens have taken a lot of the jobs that they say are no longer available for those who lack education or skills.

No, we must have more governmental programs. They solve everything.

This article was posted by Steve on Sunday, February 21st, 2010. Comments are currently closed.

10 Responses to “NYT: The New Poor – Long Term Jobless”

  1. proreason says:

    “long term joblessness” – what a mystery.

    The first time it happened, it was Herbert Hoover’s fault, and it took Saint Roosevelt 16 years to fix it.

    And now George Bush has caused the problem again.

    Luckily we will have Saint Obamy for the next 7 years, which should get us half way through the crisis.

    If we can get that nasty 22nd amendment revoked, or better yet, just ignore that little “flaw”, then Saint Obamy should be able to replicated Saint Roosevelt’s triumph.

  2. swee says:

    Is it possible that the long-term jobless U.S. citizens will begin to stage protests in front of La Raza offices….complaining that illegals have taken the jobs that belong to citizens? Would that be racist?

  3. GetBackJack says:

    Keep’em pregnant and barefoot in the government handout line.

    That’s control, baby.

    And control is what governments are all about.

  4. canary says:

    The NYT’s photo of Jean Eisen speaks volumes on needing blood pressure and cholesterol as she relies ‘on local food banks (plural)’. Share, Mrs. Eisen.

    NYT’s “Yet the social safety net is already showing severe strains”
    evidence the NYT’s wants a total socialist country so they can change their name to the USA Social Net.

  5. GL0120 says:

    I heard on Rush’s show that TCO wants to extend unemployment benefits to 99 weeks.
    Having been out of work for nearly a year I’d say shove the benefits, cut taxes, and quit attacking every industry that comes into view; then I could get back to work.

    • jobeth says:

      Only one possible flaw in your idea…It makes perfect sense and would work.

      That’s not what the bunch who doesn’t want to waste a crisis wants. Your idea can’t possibly be good for the “I won” and crowd. No control in it for them over YOUR life.

      I long for the old days when Bush was still in and we only had to worry about a little over spending. There is nothing this guy won’t involve himself in so long as it gives him and his minions control over our lives.

  6. joeblough says:

    There’s got to be a way to impeach this Obama bastard.

« Front Page | To Top
« | »