« | »

NYT: Publishing US Secrets Is Our Duty

It doesn’t get much more clear than this. The New York Times really hates this country.

From the august New York Times editorial pages:

The image “http://www.nauticos.com/images/NYT_banner.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

January 4, 2006

On the Subject of Leaks

Given the Bush administration’s appetite for leak investigations (three are under way), this seems a good moment to try to clear away the fog around this issue.

A democratic society cannot long survive if whistle-blowers are criminally punished for revealing what those in power don’t want the public to know – especially if it’s unethical, illegal or unconstitutional behavior by top officials. Reporters need to be able to protect these sources, regardless of whether the sources are motivated by policy disputes or nagging consciences. This is doubly important with an administration as dedicated as this one is to extreme secrecy.

The longest-running of the leak cases involves Valerie Wilson, a covert C.I.A. operative whose identity was leaked to the columnist Robert Novak. The question there was whether the White House was using this information in an attempt to silence Mrs. Wilson’s husband, a critic of the Iraq invasion, and in doing so violated a federal law against unmasking a covert operative. There is a world of difference between that case and a current one in which the administration is trying to find the sources of a New York Times report that President Bush secretly authorized spying on American citizens without warrants. The spying report was a classic attempt to give the public information it deserves to have. The Valerie Wilson case began with a cynical effort by the administration to deflect public attention from hyped prewar intelligence on Iraq. The leak inquiry in that case ended up targeting the press, and led to the jailing of a Times reporter.

When the government does not want the public to know what it is doing, it often cites national security as the reason for secrecy. The nation’s safety is obviously a most serious issue, but that very fact has caused this administration and many others to use it as a catchall for any matter it wants to keep secret, even if the underlying reason for the secrecy is to prevent embarrassment to the White House. The White House has yet to show that national security was harmed by the report on electronic spying, which did not reveal the existence of such surveillance – only how it was being done in a way that seems outside the law.

Leak investigations are often designed to distract the public from the real issues by blaming the messenger. Take the third leak inquiry, into a Washington Post report on secret overseas C.I.A. camps where prisoners are tortured or shipped to other countries for torture. The administration said the reporting had damaged America’s image. Actually, the secret detentions and torture did that.

Illegal spying and torture need to be investigated, not whistle-blowers and newspapers.

It’s almost funny. This is the same newspaper that claims it has a right to protect its sources. Yet the Times insists the federal government has no right (let alone duty) to protect secrets vital to our national defense.

And I’m not the first to notice this. Chief Justice Burger noted this same hypocrisy in his dissenting opinion in the Pentagon Papers case, thirty-five years ago:

Interestingly, the Times explained its refusal to allow the Government to examine its own purloined documents by saying in substance this might compromise its sources and informants! The Times thus asserts a right to guard the secrecy of its sources while denying that the Government of the United States has that power.

When the next terrorist attack strikes our shores — and sadly, it will come — I hope everyone remembers who enabled our enemies at every turn.

And I trust the worthies at the Times will receive the kind of rough-hewn justice traditionally reserved for traitors in a time of war.

This article was posted by Steve on Wednesday, January 4th, 2006. Comments are currently closed.

47 Responses to “NYT: Publishing US Secrets Is Our Duty”

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.

« Front Page | To Top
« | »