Comments on: NYT: US Stopped Israel Attack On Iran

By: Eagle334th

Eagle334th — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:59:51 +0000

The timing could not be more perfect.

Line up the haters of Israel..

By: BannedbytheTaliban

BannedbytheTaliban — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:50:56 +0000

Jelly ok, but I’d rather leave him for the camel spiders than the ants. And to quote the Eagles “old Billy was right, lets kill all the lawyers and kill them tonight!”

Ahh, what a world we could have without lawyers, you know, people like John Edwards.

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:12:04 +0000

Ok…I understand the MSM bias stuff, and I understand the not fragging him part but couldn’ t we smear his head with a jelly pack? At least it would give the ants a bad taste in their mouths! (you aren’t a lawyer are you?) Haaaaa

By: BannedbytheTaliban

BannedbytheTaliban — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:50:53 +0000

He is an idiot. I was focusing more on how the MSM had their panties in a wad and the double standard of liberal “reporting” and “conservative” “reports.” It is freedom of press to sell the country out as long as it is in the name of liberalism. I wouldn’t have fragged him though. I would of just barried him neck deep in the desert.

By: artpa

artpa — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:39:42 +0000

I think this is much more revealing of how partisan the CIA has become, they need to clean house of all the Carter and Clinton people who call the times (notice they don’t call the post) whenever they hear something that could be damaging to our nation or a president with an R after his name.

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:23:34 +0000

No….he is a blooming, frigging idiot!! The troops should have fragged him instead of letting him leave them on the “pinpointed” battlefield. Talk about luck. He wouldn’t have done that to me and my Marines!!
Grrrrrrr…..I loathe lawyers!!

By: BannedbytheTaliban

BannedbytheTaliban — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:16:49 +0000

Remember all the hype about Geraldo (sp?) giving away troop positions. But I’m sure that was only because he was reporting for FoxNews.

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:59:36 +0000

Iran knows it is coming…..just when is the question! The Times is the enemies tabloid of choice. Can’t wait to find out when Michele is going to have a (illegal) Aliens baby or if Oprah is meeting President Hambone on the side. This rag would sooner see the fall of America and the rise of Communism. All for a buck in the plus column. I might pick up my neighbors’ dog crap with the Times but I would never wrap a fish in it. That…..would make it not worth eating and stink up the neighborhood!! BTW……I could talk about the logistics of such a operation…..but that would tip the hands of balance. Unlike the Times, I Love America!!

By: wardmama4

wardmama4 — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:39:41 +0000

Ok this has 3 purposes – the so-called economic disaster has to be dropped in preparation of The One’s ™ ascension to the Throne of Power (and subsequent ‘magical’ repair of the economy), to prevent evilbushitlerburtonco from actually approving and/or dropping said bombs upon Iran on January 19th to ruin aforementioned ascention and of course, finally and always to remind the stupid masses (like any masses read the NYTs) that GWBush is violent, evil and always, always wrong.

And perhaps to give Iran a heads up on who is preparing to attack them.

By: River

River — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:49:10 +0000

This was widely reported on the news, and I believe it was Drudge who posted it first. It wasn’t a “secret request”! This bullcrap is the reason people aren’t buying the Times – or a lot of other papers – these days. They think, and may be right, that a lot of the public has such a short memory or attention span that they can recycle old stories without anyone noticing.

By: Confucius

Confucius — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:38:01 +0000

He should be air-dropped into Iran wearing a T-shirt saying “I Love Bush!”

By: sheehanjihad

sheehanjihad — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:53:45 +0000

Thanks SG, I was wondering where it went….lol

By: sheehanjihad

sheehanjihad — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:15:39 +0000

I thought the same thing when I posted it this morning in the selected news section. Why on earth can people give up secrets like this, or at least give the impression that Israel was actually going to attack when they have no real solid proof of it? That is treason, and this ______ should be shot.

By: proreason

proreason — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:16:45 +0000

The author of this piece should be tried and hung.

By: sheehanjihad

sheehanjihad — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:25:12 +0000

Coming from the NYT, whether it’s believable or not is suspect immediately, but since they are publicizing a possible attack on one of their benefactors, maybe it’s true!

Bush reportedly rejected Israeli plea to raid Iran

WASHINGTON — President George W. Bush rejected a plea from Israel last year to help it raid Iran’s main nuclear complex, opting instead to authorize a new U.S. covert action aimed at sabotaging Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons program, The New York Times reported.

Israel’s request was for specialized bunker-busting bombs that it wanted for an attack that tentatively involved flying over Iraq to reach Iran’s major nuclear complex at Natanz, where the country’s only known uranium enrichment plant is located, the Times reported Saturday in its online edition. The White House deflected requests for the bombs and flyover but said it would improve intelligence-sharing with Israel on covert U.S. efforts to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program…

http://www.comcast.net/article.....US.Israel/