If they failed to notice a “tens of thousands” march on DC, then they will certainly fail to notice a “few” milling about ABC news headquarters in Manhattan.

Because they invent their own fantasy worlds inside their heads, and it has nothing to do with reality.

And when they get to implement their fantasies,and the fantasies fail, as they always do, they are completed unaffected. They answer is never to try something else that might work. The answer is always to double down on the failed attempt, then triple down.

I’ve always labeled them as childlike, but even children learn from their mistakes.

Insane is a better description.

Well said Petro, but I did see a wee gap that need some additional words, so I corrected it for you

Liberals are ideologues. As a result, they tend to see conservatives through an ideological prism, and they may mistakenly attribute Liberal traits to conservatives. Thus the Liberal author of this New York Times hit-piece makes a fundamental error of treating conservatism as an ideology: “the conservative movement [must meet] the demands of coming up with a new ideological agenda to meet changing times….”

Liberals cannot stop themselves from falling into this trap, because of their ideological view of human beings: that people––even conservatives––are plastic, equal, and fungible, like a field of daisies or a herd of cattle or swarm of flies, but of course flies that can be remolded into some Liberal utopian ideal, e.g., communist man.

But of course this author is being stupid, because ideology and change are playthings for Liberals. They have nothing to do with us, and are simply not part of the conservative attitude. (Which is not to ignore the existence of certain conservative philosophies, such as libertarianism, Ayn Rand objectivists, et al.)

Simply put, Liberals are radicals and utopians, whereas conservatives are people who understand and accept the world as it is … people who see that there are things outside man, things bigger than man, things such as biology or nature or God or moral causes or civilization, and who value the things that work. Thus conservatives do not view the world (as Liberals do) as a terrible place, as an endless pile of “problems” that must be corrected and overcome with an agenda for change.

Conservatives understand and accept that there are permanent conditions of human existence that are largely beyond human control, and that tampering with them will do more harm than good. Or that, if we must tamper with them, our changes should at least be prudent, partial, piecemeal, and carried out in a competent, businesslike manner, so that the social fabric is not rent asunder in the process––whereas Liberals don’t give a damn, and in fact take delight in all manner of destruction.

There will always be sensible, realistic, and moderate people, and they are the people we call “conservatives.”

Don’t belittle audacity.

And if you think the game is over, don’t make the mistake of getting in the way of the coming recoil.

You’ve only begun to see real audacity.