Comments on: NYT Crows: US Prints List Of Nuke Sites

By: canary

canary — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:41:55 +0000

How come we don’t have nuke maps on other countries, if this is so petty. Obama probably gave the real secret stuff his homie Majesty the King of Saudi-Arabia birthplace of the Quran.

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:17:36 +0000

I’m with you on that!!

By: Confucius

Confucius — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:02:17 +0000

I agree with proreason. This release of information coincides with Obama’s recent policy positions.

Obama is helping Dubai go nuclear, giving the nod to Iran and doing nothing with North Korea. In contrast, he’s upset with the U.S. being nuclear.

So why not help the terrorists with some intel?

By: TNpatriot

TNpatriot — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:38:46 +0000

“How many folks have just been put at newer and real grave risk…?”

Since I live about 10 minutes away from The Oak Ridge National Labs Y-12 plant, I know I am one of them. At least I know how much material we have stored there now, and that if an attack occurs, I will certainly go quick.

By: MinnesotaRush

MinnesotaRush — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:12:01 +0000

Pro .. you’re right!

This wasn’t an “accident”. How many people had to review, or handle, that dispatch before it went out? And if an “accident”, why wasn’t it QUICKLY retracted? Accident .. BULLSHIT!!!

If they want to try to sell this “accident crap”, then they better admit that there are DANGEROUSLY INCOMPETENT BOOBS throughout this administration and Congress! (and MSM)

““It’s a better listing than anything I’ve seen” of the nation’s civilian nuclear complex, Mr. Cochran said. “But it’s no national-security breach.”

NO NATIONAL SECURITY BREACH!?!?!? WHATHA???

What??? Ya’ gotta give GPS data before it’s a breach (???) .. ya’ dimwit Cochran!

Good God!!! This is absolutely deplorable. How many folks have just been put at newer and real grave risk because of another o-blah-blah “blunder”??? Despicable!!!

By: Reality Bytes

Reality Bytes — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:11:09 +0000

Irrelevant! Obama’s gonna empty them out anyway.

By: BigOil

BigOil — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:59:06 +0000

Most transparent administration ever. We have nothing left to hide.

By: pdsand

pdsand — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:45:05 +0000

“The information, considered confidential but not classified, was assembled for transmission later this year to the International Atomic Energy Agency as part of a process by which the United States is opening itself up to stricter inspections in hopes that foreign countries, especially Iran and others believed to be clandestinely developing nuclear arms, will do likewise.”

What a sad pitiful joke.

And y’all are correct, it does seem that the CSAF had to go because of the B-52 that accidentally flew with a nuclear bomb on its wing, but I somehow don’t think Obama will be forced to resign over this incident.

By: proreason

proreason — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:44:03 +0000

It wasn’t an accident.

It’s ludicrous to think so.

By: David

David — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:40:52 +0000

It seems to me any mistake in the Bush admin was followed by immediate outrage and frothing-mouth demands that someone step down. Why does it appear that no one will be fired for violating national security so grossly. Could it be:
1. The current administration simply doesn’t care about national security.
2. That you can’t lawfully fire someone for doing what their boss told them to do.

By: JohnMG

JohnMG — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:08:25 +0000

….”The Obama administration prepared the document to comply with a decade-old international agreement aimed at providing the International Atomic Energy Agency with a comprehensive picture of the country’s nuclear and nuclear-related activities. The U.S. made the agreement to encourage other countries to provide similar disclosure of their nuclear activities…..”

Was it really an accident? With the Moron we’ll never really know, but this is just the type of thing that fits his modus operandi. And the MSM is one of his tools. I tend to believe it was a deliberate leak. And all this coming on the heels of Obama saying he believes Iran has legitimate needs for nuclear power. Can anyone think it mere coincidence? I don’t!

By: BillK

BillK — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:44:09 +0000

The Treason Times sends al Qaeda rushing to their favorite Internet archive sites.

U.S. Releases Secret Nuclear List by Accident

A 266-page document that gives detailed information about civilian nuclear sites and programs, marked “highly confidential,” was accidentally made public by the federal government, the New York Times reported Tuesday…

http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....ear-sites/

It was stupid that it happened (on Obama’s watch no less), but leave it to the NYT to publicize it.