<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Considering Strikes In Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139154</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139154</guid>
		<description>Wow, one of Oblabby&#039;s wee little testicles got an itch.  You go git &#039;em, Barry.  You show &#039;em who&#039;s boss &#039;round here.  But not too much...you might horrify Hillary and Pelosi and cause permanent damage to their eternal good looks.  Or, you might cause Barney to acquire a speech impediment. 

So be careful.  And shhhhhhhh  don&#039;t let &#039;em know you&#039;re coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, one of Oblabby&#8217;s wee little testicles got an itch.  You go git &#8216;em, Barry.  You show &#8216;em who&#8217;s boss &#8217;round here.  But not too much&#8230;you might horrify Hillary and Pelosi and cause permanent damage to their eternal good looks.  Or, you might cause Barney to acquire a speech impediment. </p>
<p>So be careful.  And shhhhhhhh  don&#8217;t let &#8216;em know you&#8217;re coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right of the People</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139111</link>
		<dc:creator>Right of the People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139111</guid>
		<description>Missile strikes?  I guess there goes another aspirin factory.

Not to be a stick in the mud, but has anybody consulted with the Paki government about this?  After all, this qualifies a invading a sovereign country, even a piss-poor one like Pakistan.  If they give their OK then fine but we don&#039;t need more crap from the left in third world countries like France and the Cuba about us being &quot;imperialists&quot;.

I don&#039;t like this &quot;limited&quot; war crap.  It got a lot of friends killed in Vietnam, and it is getting a lot of our brave men and women killed and maimed in here and Iraq.

10-7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missile strikes?  I guess there goes another aspirin factory.</p>
<p>Not to be a stick in the mud, but has anybody consulted with the Paki government about this?  After all, this qualifies a invading a sovereign country, even a piss-poor one like Pakistan.  If they give their OK then fine but we don&#8217;t need more crap from the left in third world countries like France and the Cuba about us being &#8220;imperialists&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like this &#8220;limited&#8221; war crap.  It got a lot of friends killed in Vietnam, and it is getting a lot of our brave men and women killed and maimed in here and Iraq.</p>
<p>10-7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artboyusa</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139094</link>
		<dc:creator>artboyusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139094</guid>
		<description>Good thing we&#039;ve kept the element of surprise, huh? Banned&#039;s right; they know they can&#039;t outfight us but they can sure outlast us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing we&#8217;ve kept the element of surprise, huh? Banned&#8217;s right; they know they can&#8217;t outfight us but they can sure outlast us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odie44</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139089</link>
		<dc:creator>Odie44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139089</guid>
		<description>The current wars are for posturing purposes only. 
What to actually do is another thing.
This goes for Bambi, Dems and the MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current wars are for posturing purposes only.<br />
What to actually do is another thing.<br />
This goes for Bambi, Dems and the MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BannedbytheTaliban</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139086</link>
		<dc:creator>BannedbytheTaliban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139086</guid>
		<description>If the administration goes ahead with strike, it would be the first thing he got right.  Of course he&#039;ll probably pull back once there are protests.  He wouldn&#039;t want the shine to come off the apple.

Support for the effort in Afghanistan is at its lowest point, and the media has shifted its assault on Iraq to the Afghani front.  For the last two years they have been reporting that the Taliban are at the gates of Kabul.  Let’s face it, the resolve of our enemies is so much greater than ours (America as a whole, not those who post here, we all know what needs to be done), it is beginning to trump our military superiority.
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the administration goes ahead with strike, it would be the first thing he got right.  Of course he&#8217;ll probably pull back once there are protests.  He wouldn&#8217;t want the shine to come off the apple.</p>
<p>Support for the effort in Afghanistan is at its lowest point, and the media has shifted its assault on Iraq to the Afghani front.  For the last two years they have been reporting that the Taliban are at the gates of Kabul.  Let’s face it, the resolve of our enemies is so much greater than ours (America as a whole, not those who post here, we all know what needs to be done), it is beginning to trump our military superiority.<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139069</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-considering-strikes-in-pakistan#comment-139069</guid>
		<description>The Moron hasn&#039;t completely destabalized Pakistan yet?

Well, it&#039;s only day 58.....give him time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Moron hasn&#8217;t completely destabalized Pakistan yet?</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s only day 58&#8230;..give him time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

