Well let me solve that for you heykev…….he’s an idiot and his grades and thesis prove it.

Do you think for even a nano-second that if they proved otherwise, we wouldn’t have our noses rubbed in their glory 48×7.

To say it is to laugh.

If the MSM won’t do their job, it’s a shame that no conservative new organization can get a hold of this information.

If the National Enquior of all places has to break stories on John Edwards, then is there really no one that will diaviete from the puff pieces of BHO, his lovely bride and oh so special new doggie.

But fortunately Nerobama will soon have Justice Sonia Sotomayor to help all of us adjust our thinking in the not too distant future. And I’m sure that George Washington, Ben Franklin, John Marshall, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and the rest of those dead white males who wrote the Constitution could have learned a lot from this proud and wise Latina woman with her richness of experience. Adjutorium nostrum, Domine.

Latest news has said on his not attending church is that he takes time to meditate. Any book he touches probably is the one of the 3 he’s under contract to write, or shows him on the front cover. Probably working on his memoirs.

He also, wrotes something to the effect the possibility of the Freedom of Religion amendment was fought for by Thomas Jefferson, who may have not been a Christian, but believed in God. Obama is a man of many faces and masks.

This is the basic flaw in his premise.

The founding fathers were not about telling people what or how to think. They were, instead a collective group of prominent citizens of the crown colonies, selected by the public to represent their THOUGHTS and DESIRES. The groups felt that by having these people represent them, basically, noblemen in the eyes of the crown, land owners and men of means, as the colloquial line of thinking was back then, then the masses would have a stronger voice.

These men turncoats to the crown itself, would have “hanged in publik” by king George’s representatives, the collective law of the land.

Obama missed the mark with this statement and thus, his fundamental lack of understanding of how democracy was founded here, how it matriculated, how it spread. It wasn’t these founding fathers getting people all riled up. It was these people getting the founding fathers all riled up and stepping into action.

There was no ACORN for them. No mass media (owned by the crown, as it were) to speak their treason to king George. No fawning group of malcontents who wanted to destroy the crown. They simply wanted to govern themselves.

Blammo is such a consummate revolutionary War retard that it’s beyond my comprehension. It shows with a very bright light how he was taught about our split from Britain. His ignorance of the great experiment and how the WORLD watched in awe as a rag-tag army of poorly trained and often discouraged people fought and died to be free of tyranny.

–And defied the greatest power on Earth–

But not for the sake of “redistributing the wealth. It was for the sake of not being taxed illegally, not having a voice in government and being bled dry financially by the crown.

Along with that came the desire for freedom. Real, true freedom to do as one pleases so long as it hurt no one else.

He just doesn’t get it. And it’s things like this that make me want to kick him off his high horse into the mud and then let my own horse stomp the crap out of him. He is filth. He is the epitome of arrogance in ignorance. He’s the kind of idiot that would tell Einstein that “sure you can go faster than light….you dummy..I saw them do it on TV”.

His lack of understanding is perhaps what causes my tolerance level to go “TILT” and I short circuit the way I would when someone says “irregardless” or “supposably” or “disorientated”.

Then, it goes from the sublime to the absolute comical because he BELIEVES his own crap (or appears to) with such conviction, such certainty. The King’s New Clothes.

And, if this is the densely-packed crap-for-brains we have at the helm, there is now no mystery as to what kind of waters we shall sail. Do liberal historians read this crap and actually also believe that our founding fathers, and the documents they authored were to tell the masses “how to think”?

My god….it’s a dead give away on how he understands this nation. What a fool.

Interesting question.

The pace of change in today’s world may be 10 times what it was in the ancient world, at least for technology. It’s probably not unreasonable to say that there have been as many innovations in the last 300 years as there were in the prior 3,000.

Does politics move as quickly? Maybe so.

It took the Roman Empire about 400 to 500 years to go from its height to its demise.

When was the height of the US’s prestige and power? I would say the 50’s, because during that period there were no challengers since the world had nearly been destroyed. Since then, we have seen a steady and relentless attack on the US, much of it from within (and in my opinion, started from without).

If the pace of political change is equivalent to the pace of techological change, one could say that the end of the US as the greatest nation ever may well be near.

And the barbarians have certainly siezed power in Washington.

With the full intent of destroying the country.

Your last point is well said.

The rapid deterioration rate of this country, on every level, transacted by this administration is nothing short of amazing. Are we witnessing the fall of another Roman Empire?

Nerobama, Susan Estrich, et al., must have soon forgotten the legal maxim taught by that brilliant legal scholar and Harvard law professor Holland Taylor: “The law is reason, free from passion” (Aristotle). Yep, reason, not empathy, is what the law is about. Dura lex, sed lex.